Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETER ENGILIS, Jr.; CATHY No. 23-4201 ENGILIS, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-07859- Plaintiffs - Appellants, VC v. MONSANTO COMPANY, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court

HILL, P.J. *540Appellants,1 led by Monsanto Company and including intervenors California Citrus *541Mutual, Western Agricultural Processors Association, California Cotton Ginners and Growers Association, California Grain and

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOSELIN BARRERA, et al., Plaintiffs, V. C.A. No. N15C-10-118 VLM MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant. New Nome” Nome Nene? meee” eee Nee” Nee” eee” MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: May 31, 2019 Upon Defendant’s Daubert Motion Regarding General Causation, GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Upon Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Causation, DENIED. Upon Plaintiffs’ Daubert Motion to Strike Certain

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWIN HARDEMAN, Nos. 19-16636 Plaintiff-Appellee/ 19-16708 Cross-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 3:16-cv-00525-VC 3:16-md-02741-VC MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from

Justice MOORE. Appellants (Corporations) appeal an order striking their affirmative defenses based on the “door-closing” statute, S.C.Code Ann. § 15-5-150 (1976), and the statute of limitations. We reverse in part and affirm in part. FACTS Respondents (Plaintiffs), who are South Carolina residents, commenced this action for actual and punitive damages allegedly resulting from the purch

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. ) KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney ) General of the State of Delaware, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N21C-09-179 MMJ CCLD v. ) ) MONSANTO COMPANY; SOLUTIA,

404 F.Supp.2d 594 (2005) SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Dekalb Genetics Corp., Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Dow Agrosciences, LLC, and Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. and Agrigenetics, Inc., collectively d.b.a. Mycogen Seeds, Defendants. No. Civ. 02-1331-DLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 8, 2005.

404 F.Supp.2d 584 (2005) SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Dekalb Genetics Corp., Pioneer Hibred International, Inc., Dow Agrosciences, LLC, and Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. and Agrigenetics, Inc., collectively d.b.a. Mycogen Seeds, Defendants. No. CIV. 02-1331-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 8, 2005.

409 F.Supp.2d 536 (2005) SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Dekalb Genetics Corp., Pioneer Hibred International, Inc., Dow Agrosciences, LLC, and Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. and Agrigenetics, Inc., collectively d.b.a. Mycogen Seeds, Defendants. No. 02-1331-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 8, 2005.

DECISION AND ENTRY DENYING FINAL APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; ORDER OF JULY 9, 1999, INTER ALIA, CONDITIONALLY CERTIFYING SUBCLASSES FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT AND PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT (DOC. #31) VACATED; FURTHER PROCEDURES ORDERED OF PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS; MOTION TO INTERVENE FILED BY CLASS MEMBERS FRANK BREWER, JAMES REED, AND ERIC KIRK (DOC. #43) OVERRULED, AS MOOT; MOTION TO INTERVENE FILED BY CLA

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00232-CV __________________ IN RE BAYER CROP SCIENCE L.P., MONSANTO COMPANY, AND BASF CORPORATION __________________________________________________________________ Orig

NO. 07-06-0402-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A APRIL 18, 2008 ______________________________ PERRY HEARD, APPELLANT V. MONSANTO COMPANY, APPELLEE

NO. 07-06-0402-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A APRIL 18, 2008 ______________________________ PERRY HEARD, APPELLANT V.

NO. 07-06-0402-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A APRIL 18, 2008 ______________________________ PERRY HEARD, APP

OPINION OF THE COURT (May 30, 2017) CABRET, Associate Justice. Nashville Phillip appeals the Superior Court’s May 8, 2015 judgment awarding Wilma Marsh-Monsanto $16,320.84 under a November 21, 2011 contract of sale for real property in St. Thomas. Because the Superior Court erred in interpreting and applying Marsh-Monsanto’s pleadings in this case, and erred in awarding her damages u

[J-92A-2019, J-92B-2019, J-92C-2019, J-92D-2019 and J-92E-2019] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. RICHARD THOMAS WALSH, : No. 14 WAP 2019 EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF : THOMAS J. WALSH, DECEASED : Appeal from the Order of the Superior : Court entered June 20, 2018 at No.

[J-92A-E-2019][M.O. - Donohue, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT RICHARD THOMAS WALSH, : No. 14 WAP 2019 EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF : THOMAS J. WALSH, DECEASED : Appeal from the Order of the Superior : Court entered 6/20/18 at No. 1661 WDA : 2016 vacating the order of the

889 S.W.2d 570 (1994) CORNERSTONES MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Appellant, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Armco, Inc., Armco Steel Company, and Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc., Appellees. No. C14-92-00204-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14 Dist.). November 10, 1994. Rehearing Overruled December 8, 1994. *572 Richa

865 S.W.2d 937 (1993) MONSANTO COMPANY, Armco, Inc., Armco Steel Company and Turner, Collie and Braden, Inc., Petitioners, v. CORNERSTONES MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Respondent. No. D-3544. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued September 14, 1993. Decided November 24, 1993. *938 Robert P. Quinn, Jr., Houston, Donald V.

Case Number: 01-97-01142-CV 05/28/2002 Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the mandate date of a process 05/28/2002 Case stored in record room 05/28/2002 Record returned to Court of Appeals 05/28/2002 Mandate issued 05/23/2002 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed proceeding denied 04/08/2002 Motion for Rehearing forwarded 04/08/2002 Motion for Rehearing - Filed 03/28/2002 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed Granted 03/28/2002 Opinion issued CA reversed; judg rend/part; re