⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Montwillo v. Tull”

MONTWILLO v. Tullpublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2008-06-02 · Published · cited 2× · 632 F. Supp. 2d 917; 88 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1464; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43074; 2008 WL 2264574
632 F.Supp.2d 917 (2008) Paul MONTWILLO, Plaintiff, v. William TULL; Daniel Gibby; and Gibby Novelties LLC dba Arsenic & Apple Pie, Defendants. William Tull, Counter-Claimant, v. Paul Montwillo, Counter-Defendant. No. C 07-3947 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 2, 2008. *918 Stephen Anthony S
District Court, S.D. California · 2014-08-06 · Published · cited 3× · 38 F. Supp. 3d 1192; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108743; 2014 WL 3867489
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Creative Empire, LLC’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 41.) Plaintiff filed an opposition, (Dkt. No. 44), and Defendant replied. (Dkt. No. 46.) A hearing was held on August 1, 2014. (Dkt. No. 47.) James Crosby, Esq. and Jamie Riderbeck, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff and M