Cases

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Monica M. Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mo

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ April 01, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25A0461, A25A0462. STEVE MOORE v. BROWN, DUTTON & CRIDER LAW FIRM, LLC. Brown, Dutton & Crider Law Firm, LLC (“Law Firm”) filed a petition for contempt against Steve Moore, alleging that Moore failed to comply with an order issued by the Superior Court of

MEMORANDUM * Kenneth Lynn Moore (“Moore”) challenges the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim asserting a right to obtain and test DNA evidence that could potentially exculpate him from the 1978 rape of Linda S. He claims that the district court misapplied California’s issue preclusion law or, alternatively, improperly failed to apply an equitable exception to California’s issue preclusio

270 S.W.3d 447 (2008) STATE of Missouri ex rel. Darrell L. MOORE, Relator, v. The Honorable Jason BROWN, Respondent. No. SD 29089. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. November 19, 2008. *448 T. Todd Myers, Springfield, MO, for relator. Thomas D. Carver, Springfield, MO, for respondent. <

993 S.W.2d 871 (1999) Kimberly MOORE, Appellant, v. Jerry BROWN, Appellee. No. 2-98-322-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. May 27, 1999. Rehearing Overruled June 24, 1999. *872 James W. Creech, Dallas, for appellant. H. Craig Black, Greenville, for appellee. Before Panel A: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVI

ORDER PER CURIAM. In a single-judge order dated October 4, 1996, the Court dismissed, as jurisdictionally defective, the appellant’s application for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The appellant, on October 28, 1996, filed a motion for panel review pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. In addition, despite the s

Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed.

CANE, P.J. Todd and Connie Brown appeal the portion of a judgment directing a verdict in favor of James and Denise Moore on the basis that Todd Brown was negligent in constructing and repairing the basement wall of the Browns' home that the Moores purchased.1 The only issue on appeal is whether a homeowner-purchaser has a cause of action against a private homeowner-seller for the homeowner-seller's ne

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

873 F.2d 1447 Moorev.Brown NO. 88-1441 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. MAR 02, 1989 1 Appeal From: E.D.Mo. 2 AFFIRMED.

ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge. Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 64) filed in this case on February 3, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas, regarding Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 55). More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by th

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, January 24, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24A0060. MOORE REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, LLC v. RONDA BROWN. Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.

Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.

Order affirmed.

OPINION PER CURIAM. Hyoja Akiko Moore appeals pro se from the District Court’s order remanding this matter to state court. We will dismiss this appeal in part and summarily affirm in part. See 3d Cir. LAR 27.4 (2008); 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6. Tremayne Brown, Roberto Evans and Diane Powers filed suit against Moore in New Jersey state court. Their complaint asserts seven state-

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered November 24, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants Sofi Hacking Corp. and Mohammed Sakaria for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on plaintiff’s inability to demonstrate a serious injury to her cervical spine within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed

OPINION PER CURIAM. Hyoja Akiko Moore appeals pro se from the District Court’s order remanding this matter to state court. We will dismiss this appeal in part and summarily affirm in part. See 3d Cir. LAR 27.4 (2008); 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6. Tremayne Brown, Roberto Evans and Diane Powers filed suit against Moore in New Jersey state court. Their complaint asserts seven state-

This is an appeal from a judgment setting aside a conveyance of 55 acres based on a finding of undue influence and inadequate consideration. Henry and Catherine Moore appeal, arguing that the trial judge erred in finding that the conveyance, made to them by Minnie Lee Brown in consideration of $3,000 plus payment of a $1,860.20 debt owed by Ms. Brown, was made as a result of undue influence. We affirm. Ms. Brown, according to the evidence provided by both parties, was a poor wo

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, May 24, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0228. COURTNEY PRECIOUS BROWN v. APRIL OWENS MOORE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 16EV002894 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia