Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2632 JEFFREY CHAITOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court f

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

633 F.3d 1006 (2011) Ray BIRMINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; Verizon Communications; Vodafone Group, PLC., a joint venture, d/b/a Verizon Wireless; Cellular Inc. Network; Utah RSA 6; Verizon Power Partners; Wasatch Utah RSA No. 2, d/b/a Verizon Wireless; *1007 Verizon Wireless Utah, operating under the name and style of Verizon Wireless; Verizon Wireless (VAW), Defendants-

SYLLABUS The Minn. Stat. § 13C.01 (1) (2002), price cap for consumer credit reports requested and received by mail does not apply to consumer credit reports requested and received via the Internet. OPINION In this consumer fraud action, appellant claims that respondent violated Minn. Stat. § 13C.01, subd. 1(a) (2002), by charging more than

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HOLDERMAN, District Judge. On June 1, 2005, plaintiffs Evelyn Clark, (“Clark”), and Bradley Eldred (“Eldred”), (collectively “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, filed a second amended class action complaint against defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), and Consumerlnfo.com (collectively “defendants”), all

OPINION AND ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (Dkt, 57) AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND/OR REMITTITUR (Dkt. 57) MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David. Alan Smith agreed, to submit to a background investigation

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge On June 3, 2016, Andrew Stutfield Rogers (“Rogers” or “plaintiff’) filed this action in Wake County Superior Court against Keffer, Inc., d/b/a Keffer Chrysler Jeep Dodge (“Keffer”), SunTrust Bank (“SunTrust”), Elite Skippers, Inc., (“Elite Skippers”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association d/b/a Chase (“Chase”),

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Angela Anderson filed suit against Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC alleging violations of the Fair Credit Report Act '(“FCRA”).1 Specifically, Plaintiff alleges Defendant merged her credit file with that of another consumer, sold consumer credit reports that included false accounts and infor

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (Docket No. 205). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be GRANTED. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background The present ease commenced when Plaintiff Donna K. Soutter (“Soutter” or “Plainti

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to certify a class of all consumers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania who received a letter from the defendant that allegedly contains misstatements and misrepresentations in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. For the reasons stated below, the Court grant

(2008) Noemia CARVALHO, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; and TransUnion LLC, Defendants. Case No. C 08-1317 JF (HRL). United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. December 2, 2008. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING MOTION

410 F.Supp.2d 1349 (2006) Theodore D. JORDAN, II, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 1:04-CV-1451. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 18, 2006. *1350 *1351 Lisa Dionne Wright, Law Office of Lisa D. Wright, Atlanta,

[Cite as Watkins v. Equifax Information Servs., L.L.C., 2026-Ohio-2802.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO MARY WATKINS, : APPEAL NO. C-250603 TRIAL NO. 25CV26735 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : JU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHANTAL ATTIAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-cv-882 (CRC) CAREFIRST, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In April 2014, a cyberattack executed through an email spear phishing campaign gave hackers unauthorized

Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE *1006In 2009, Plaintiffs, as purported class representatives, brought claims against Defendants DairyAmerica and California Dairies concerning the misreporting of milk prices. ECF No. 1. In September 2018, the parties notified the Court of their intent to settle. ECF No. 552. Plaintif

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0106p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER TWUMASI-ANKRAH, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

KANDIS A. WESTMORE, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Catrina R. Rodriguez filed the instant putative class action against Defendants U.S. Healthworks, Inc. and U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, asserting violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") and similar California laws. (Compl. ¶ 1, Dkt. No. 1-2.) Pending before the Court are Defendants' motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff's motion to remand. (Defs.' Mot.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(6) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DE 23) ANTHONY P. PATTI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. OPINION A. The Court’s Opinion, Order and Judgment This case is brought pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). The parties to this case — Plaintiff on her own behalf and Defendant via counsel — appeared for t

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION DW. Data, Inc. (“DW Data”) is a Delaware Corporation that hosts and constructs small business websites, provides search engine submission service through a partnership with Earth Link and entertainment event ticketing services for performing arts venues on the web, and offers a free webs

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant HSBC Retail Services Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, filed July 20, 2012 (Doc. 38)(“Motion to Dismiss”). The Court held a hearing on September 21, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff Ro