Cases

MEMORANDUM ORDER DEBORAH. A. ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge By an order filed on September 4, 2013, the Court (Roberts, C.J.) allowed “limited supplemental expert discovery by an industrial psychologist expert due to the death of Defendant’s previous such expert[.]” Order (Document No. 752) at l.1 *128

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2014, upon consideration of the Contractor Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31), and the opposition and reply thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The plaintiffs’ claims against defendants Inmar, Inc., Carolina Supply Chain Services, LLC, Carolina Logistics Services, LLC, and WIS Internation

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 433.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. This personal injury and wrongful death action arises out of injuries allegedly suffered by the plaintiffs’ son after he ingested a dose of the over-the-counter medication, Children’s Tylenol. The Children’s Tylenol was produced by McNEILPPC, Inc. (“McNEIL-PPC”) at its Fort Washington, Pennsylvania production facility. The plaintiffs allege that their son’

143 S.W.3d 339 (2004) Brad MOORE and Lisa Evans, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Mary Stevens, Appellants, v. Weldon JOHNSON, D.O., Appellee. No. 05-03-01097-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. July 27, 2004. Rehearing Overruled September 28, 2004. *340 Patrick Short, Law Firm of Patrick S

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

540 U.S. 854 MOOREv.JOHNSON ET AL. No. 02-11088. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 322 F. 3d 89

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Revised, October 20, 2000 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ m 99-50927 _______________ MICHAEL PATRICK MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant,

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED' STATES ON REHEARING DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: The original panel opinion (presently available at 185 F.3d 244 (5th Cir. Aug.10, 1999)) is hereby withdrawn and replaced with the following. The Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division appeals from the district court’s final judgment grantin

Revised November 16, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 95-20871 BOBBY JAMES MOORE, Petitioner-Appellee, VERSUS GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC PER CURIAM: Given that no member of the panel, nor judge in regular active service of the court has requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc, the subject Petition for Rehearing En Banc will be treated as a Petition for Panel Rehearing. Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED