⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Morales v. City of Chicago”

Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-06-10 · Published · cited 1383× · 144 L. Ed. 2d 67; 119 S. Ct. 1849; 527 U.S. 41; 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4005
Justice Breyer, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. The ordinance before us creates more than a “minor limitation upon the free state of nature.” Post, at 74 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (emphasis added). The law authorizes a police officer to order any person to remove himself from any “location open to the public, whether publicly or privately owned,” Chicago Municipal Code § 8
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-08-27 · Published · cited 0× · 524 U.S. 975; 119 S. Ct. 24
Sup. Ct. Ill. [Certiorari granted, 523 U. S. 1071.] Motion of Ohio et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument denied.
Illinois Supreme Court · 1997-10-17 · Published · cited 0× · 177 Ill. 2d 440; 227 Ill. Dec. 130; 687 N.E.2d 53; 1997 Ill. LEXIS 451
JUSTICE NICKELS delivered the opinion of the court: These consolidated appeals involve 70 defendants who were charged with violating the City of Chicago’s Gang Congregation Ordinance (Chicago Municipal Code § 8 — 4 — 015 (added June 17, 1992)). In cause No. 80668, defendant Youkhana and 13 other defendants were
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 523 U.S. 1071; 118 S. Ct. 1510
Sup. Ct. Ill. Motion of respondents Jesus Morales et al. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without affidavits of indigency granted. Certiorari granted.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 523 U.S. 1116; 118 S. Ct. 1830
Sup. Ct. Ill. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1071.] Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Illinois Supreme Court · 1997-10-17 · Published · cited 94× · 687 N.E.2d 53; 177 Ill. 2d 440; 227 Ill. Dec. 130
687 N.E.2d 53 (1997) 177 Ill.2d 440 227 Ill.Dec. 130 The CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellant, v. Jesus MORALES et al., Appellees. Nos. 80479, 80485 and 80668. Supreme Court of Illinois. October 17, 1997. *57 Benna Ruth Solomon, Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel, Chicago, for City of Chicag
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-01-23 · Published · cited 23× · 78 F. Supp. 3d 791; 24 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 37; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7551
Memorandum Opinion. And Order Manish S. Shah, United States District Judge Melissa Callahan is a taxicab driver in Chicago. She obtained her license to drive a taxicab in 2007, and drove fall time between January 2009 and August 2011. Callahan asserts that, during that period, she was unable to earn the minimum wage as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act ($7.25 per hour) or by the Illinois Minimum Wag
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008-01-02 · Published · cited 24× · 529 F. Supp. 2d 941; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 631; 2008 WL 54773
529 F.Supp.2d 941 (2008) Eric. CHAGOLLA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO; Keith Herrera; Jerome Finnigan; Donovan Markiewicz; William Morales; Timothy Parker; Paul Zogg; Margaret Hopkins; and Frank Villareal, Defendants. No. 07 C 4557. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 2, 2008. *942 David Albert
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-07-09 · Published · cited 114× · 757 F.3d 722; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13071; 2014 WL 3331514
KANNE, Circuit Judge. In 2012, Chicago’s City Council voted on and adopted a new ward map to take effect in 2015. The League of Women Voters of Chicago and fourteen Chicago citizens (collectively “the League”) filed this action challenging the redistricting. The League alleged that the 2015 map failed to adhere to equal-population principles established under the Equal Protectio
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-05-28 · Published · cited 5× · 2025 IL App (1st) 241273
2025 IL App (1st) 241273 First District Third Division May 28, 2025 No. 1-24-1273
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-03-24 · Published · cited 2× · 2025 IL App (1st) 232174
2025 IL App (1st) 232174 No. 1-23-2174 Opinion filed March 24, 2025 FIRST DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024-01-05 · Published · cited 6× · 2024 IL App (1st) 221232
2024 IL App (1st) 221232 SIXTH DIVISION January 5, 2024 No. 1-22-1232 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT STEVEN TAYLOR, Independent Administrator on
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-06-12 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 IL App (1st) 220266
2023 IL App (1st) 220266 No. 1-22-0266 Opinion filed June 12, 2023 First Division IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ) LISA BITSKY and THOMAS BITSKY,
Illinois Supreme Court · 2023-01-20 · Published · cited 12× · 2023 IL 127547
2023 IL 127547 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 127547) RITA LINTZERIS et al., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellee. Opinion filed January 20, 2023. CHIEF JUSTICE THEIS delivered the judgment of t
Illinois Supreme Court · 2023-01-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 IL 127547
2023 IL 127547 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 127547) RITA LINTZERIS et al., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellee. Opinion filed January 20, 2023. CHIEF JUSTICE THEIS delivered the judgment of t
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022-09-07 · Published · cited 10× · 2022 IL App (1st) 211286
2022 IL App (1st) 211286 First District Third Division September 7, 2022 No. 1-21-1286 ) AARON POTEK, ADIN
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 IL App (1st) 192434
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this document
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 160 F. Supp. 3d 1060; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13187; 2016 WL 427565
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge Plaintiffs brought this action, seeking to enjoin Defendants from proceeding with *1062the construction of a museum on land that is adjacent to Lake Michigan. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, which was denied in part and granted in part on March 1
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021-03-05 · Published · cited 11× · 2021 IL App (1st) 191977
2021 IL App (1st) 191977 No. 1-19-1977 SIXTH DIVISION March 5, 2021 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT BRIAN J. STRAUSS, Individually and d/b/a
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 IL App (1st) 191977
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and