Cases

HEDRICK, Judge. Motions to dismiss the Attorney General’s appeal as being interlocutory in nature were filed in this Court by both Duke Power Company and the North Carolina Utilities Commission. Furthermore, in the Commission’s motion to dismiss it is noted that by order dated 16 April 1974, the Commission reconsidered the application filed by Duke and modified its order of 19 December 1973 to provide “that the coal cost and

In re Duke, Gayle H.; Duke, Herman et al.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 126225; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47,383-CA. Denied. KNOLL, J., would grant and docket.

WILLIAMS, J. |, The plaintiffs, Herman Duke and Gayle Duke, appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, Sentry Select Insurance Company. The trial court found that uninsured motorist coverage had been validly rejected by the owner of the vehicle driven by Herman Duke at the time of the accident. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On February 24, 2008, Herman Duk

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted the Florida Renewable Energy Technologies and Energy Efficiency Act 1 (the "Act"). The Act authorized the Florida Public Service Commission ("PSC") to create a plan to incentivize energy utilities to invest in nuclear power plant construction.

811 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2011) FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP., Plaintiff, v. Ronnie DUKE, Ryan Zundel, Bill Wells, Willinevah Richardson, Anthony Peters, American Nationwide Mortgage Co., CBB, Inc. d/b/a Bretlin Home Mortgage, First Escrow Company, LLC, Hardcore Motor Sports, LLC, Hardcore Racing, INC. JS Realty, LLC, Lawyers Escrow Co., Libertytitle and Escrow Services, LLC, MotorCity Financial Services, Nations Title of Ohio, North American Home Funding

This is an action brought In the Justice of the peace court of the city of Tulsa by Walter G. Duke against Roy L. Morgan to recover the sum of $185 and interest on account of work and labor done and performed by plaintiff at the instance and request of defendant. Plaintiff prevailed in the justice court and defendant appealed to the court of common pleas, where judgment was likewise rendered against him. To review the judgment of the *Page 284 court of co

902 S.W.2d 424 (1995) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Donovan DUKE, Appellant. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. March 15, 1995. *425 John E. Herbison, Nashville, for appellant. Charles W. Burson, Atty. Gen. and Reporter, Clinton J. Morgan, Counsel for the State, Crim. Justice Div., Nashville, Robert C. Sanders, Asst.

SECOND DIVISION MARKLE, LAND and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February

Upon review of the record and procedural history of this matter with respect to the errors assigned, the Full Commission finds good ground to reconsider the prior Orders which are the subject of this appeal. Due to the length and complicated nature of the procedural history of this case, a review of the rulings giving rise to this appeal is appropriate. On 17 November 1997, Deputy Commissioner Margaret Morgan Holmes filed an Order for Distribution, ordering plaintiff to distribute thir

SUMMARY ORDER We have considered all of appellants’ arguments and, substantially for the reasons explained by the District Court in its Memorandum Order, entered October 17, 2003, we hold that each is without merit. We also find that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ request for leave to amend where plaintiffs failed to file a proper motion to amend or a proposed amendment and where they have alrea

214 F.Supp.2d 341 (2002) The ALBERT FADEM TRUST, Plaintiff, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Richard Priory, Robert Brace, William Coley, Fred Fowler, Harvey Padewer and Deloitte & Touche, LLP, Defendants. Wickerware, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Duke Energy Corporation, Richard Priory, Robert Brace, David Hauser, Keith G. Butler, Sandra P. Meyer, Jeffrey L. Boyer,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JONATHAN DAVEILO DUKE, No. 20-55787 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04712- v. AB-ADS JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROLANDO JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-2731 (CRC) KEVIN McALEENAN, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rolando Jimenez alleges that he has been the victim of discrimination du

559 F.3d 425 (2009) Tommy G. MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-4186. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: September 17, 2008. Decided and Filed: March 12, 2009. *428 ARGUED: Thomas M. Peterson, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, San Francisco, Cali

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated December 22, 2008. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, in light of our determination in Benedict v Whitman Breed Abbo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIMBERLY SELLERS, Plaintiff, v. Civ. Action No: 17-2205 (EGS) KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Kimberly Sellers has worked for the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Immigration and Custom Enforcement (“ICE”) for over 30 years. She alleges that DHS ha

FILED May 30 2025, 9:18 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, United States • District Judge Plaintiff, appearing pro se, sues the Elaine Duke (“Duke”), the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security; the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”); and several other officials, claiming that she was retaliated against for participating in EEO activity. See Am. Compl. at 3 [Dkt. # 17].2 Pending

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, the third-party defendant/ counterclaim plaintiff-appellant appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered June 29, 2007, as granted *868the motion of the plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants to dismiss the counterclaims insof

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, (1) the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated December 22, 2008, which, upon a decision of the same court entered December 9, 2008, among other things, granted their motion pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 626 (d) to approve the settlement and discontin