Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Morrison v. Harris Health System”
Stone v. Alameda Health Systempublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA TAMELIN STONE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant and Respondent. S279137 First Appellate District, Division Five A164021 Alameda County Superior Court RG21092734 August 15, 202
Whole Woman's Health v. Paxtonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION INCORPORATING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW LEE YEAKEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is the above-styled and numbered action by which Plaintiffs, all providers of second-trimester abortion services in Texas, challenge the constitutionality of recently enacted Texas abortion laws.1 See 42 U.S.C. §
Whole Woman's Health v. Paxtonpublic domain
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER LEE YEAKEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is the above styled and numbered cause challenging the constitutionality of recently enacted Texas abortion laws. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The laws at issue are included in Texas Senate Bill 8, Section 6, which, inter alia, creates a new Subchapter G in the Texas Health and Safety Code. See Act of Ma
Whole Woman's Health v. Lakeypublic domain
FINAL JUDGMENT LEE YEAKEL, District Judge. Before the court is the above-styled and numbered cause. On May 12, 2014, upon joint motion of the parties, the court dismissed from this action Defendants Travis County Attorney David Escamilla, El Paso District Attorney Jaime Esparza, Hidalgo County Criminal District Attorney Rene Guerra, Bell County Attorney James E. Nichols, Bexar County Criminal Dist
MEMORANDUM & ORDER SEYBERT, District Judge: Presently pending before the Court is defendant North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System’s (“LIJ” or “Defendant”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Ann Marie Kelly’s (“Plaintiff”) Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (b)(6). (Defs.’ Mot., Docket Entry 19.) For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED
Aggreko, LLC v. Bronxcare Health System, Formerly Known as the Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Centerpublic domain
Opinion issued January 23, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00052-CV ——————————— AGGREKO, LLC, Appellant V. BRONXCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE BRONX
Morrison v. Horseshoe Casinopublic domain
[Cite as Morrison v. Horseshoe Casino, 2020-Ohio-4131.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA WILLIE MORRISON, ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 108644 v. : HORSESHOE CASINO, ET AL.,
Kljun v. Morrisonpublic domain
[Cite as Kljun v. Morrison, 2016-Ohio-2939.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103292 JEFFREY KLJUN, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS vs.
Harris v. Bessentpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CATHY A. HARRIS, in her personal capacity : and in her official capacity as Member of the : Merit Systems Protection Board, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 25-412 (RC) : v. : Re D
Harris v. Mayorkaspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ARLENE HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) No. 1:21-cv-01083 (GMH) ) KRISTI NOEM, et al., )
Morrison v. Department of the Nayypublic domain
PER CURIAM. John W. Morrison petitions for review of a'decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB” or “Board”) relating to his retirement from a civilian position with the Department of the Navy. Bécause the Board’s ruling was not a “final order” or a “final decision” in his case, we dismiss Mr. Morrison’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Cathy Harris v. Scott Bessentpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5037 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00412-RC Filed On: March 28, 2025 Cathy A. Harris, in her personal capacity and in her o
D'Aquisto v. Mission St. Joseph's Health Systempublic domain
614 S.E.2d 583 (2005) Caroline D'AQUISTO, Plaintiff, v. MISSION ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTH SYSTEM, Employer, Cambridge Integrated Services, Servicing Agent, Defendants. No. COA04-1259. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 5, 2005. Ganly & Ramer, P.L.L.C., by Thomas F. Ramer, Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee. Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis,
Warren Harris v. Muriel Bowserpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 7, 2022 Decided February 24, 2023 No. 21-7122 WARREN R. HARRIS, APPELLANT v. MURIEL BOWSER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE MAYOR OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the Di
176 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2001) COVENTRY HEALTH CARE OF KANSAS, INC., Plaintiff, v. VIA CHRISTI HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1261-JTM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 19, 2001. *1208 *1209 *1210 Alan L. Rupe, Alisa A. Nickel,
Williams v. Family Health Internationalpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALETA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-2654 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL d/b/a FHI 360, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM O
Fairbrother v. Morrisonpublic domain
KATZMANN, Circuit Judge. At trial, Greta Fairbrother presented significant evidence of sexual harassment that was sharply disputed by her employer, the State of Connecticut’s Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“DMHAS”) and the other defendants. *43The jury returned a unanimous verdict in Fairbrother’s favor on her claims of both sexually hostile work env
ODonnell v. Harris Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION SETTING OUT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge Introduction... 1057 I.Findings of Fact... 1060 A. Procedural Background... 1060 B. The Evidence in the Record... 1061 1. The Parties... 1062 2. Th
Gaylan Harris v. County of Orangepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GAYLAN HARRIS, on behalf of No. 19-56387 himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:09-cv-00098- v. AG-MLG COUNTY OF ORANGE, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the U
Morrison v. Potterpublic domain
363 F.Supp.2d 586 (2005) Meda E. MORRISON, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. 03 CIV.6495(CM)(GAY). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 23, 2005. *587 *588 Marc R. Lepelstat, New York, NY, and Waite P. Stuhl, Waite P. St