Cases

ACCEPTED 01-12-00578-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

557 F.Supp. 739 (1983) ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY v. DAWSON CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., et al. C.A. No. 74-H-790. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 5, 1983. Nunc Pro Tunc Order January 5, 1983. *740 *741 *742

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH February 13, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT A

Opinion by Judge ROTHENBERG. In this case involving the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR), Colo. Const. art. X, § 20, and Colo. Const. art. XI, §§ 3-4, plaintiffs, Douglas H. Barber, Rick Kerber, and Heggem-Lundquist Paint Company (collectively, the Taxpayers), appeal the trial court's order dismissing their general claims and Heggem-Lundquist's individual claims, and the summary judgment in favor of defendants

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 32] S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge. Victor Paul Cruz Courtroom Clerk This matter is before the Court on Defendants Eric Shinseki and Donna M. Beiter’s (collectively, “Defendants” or “Government”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”), filed on October 7, 2011. On October 21, 2011, Plaintiffs fi

768 F.Supp. 140 (1990) NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Dawn DIEHL and Gary Gallagher, Administrator of the Estate of Marlene Gallagher. Civ. A. No. 89-8189. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 20, 1990. *141 Edward J. Carney, Jr., Media, Pa., for plaintiff. J. Michael Sheridan, Kassab, Archibol

503 F.3d 1163 (2007) SAN JUAN COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America; Department of Interior; National Park Service, Defendants-Appellees, Alaska Wilderness League, California Wilderness Coalition, California Environmental Coalition, Colorado Mountain Club, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, National Parks Conservation Association, National Wildlife Refuge Association, New Mexico Wilderness All

660 S.W.2d 683 (1983) Chaiyarat SERMCHIEF, et al., Appellants, v. Mario GONZALES, et al., Respondents, and State of Missouri, Intervenor-Respondent. No. 64692. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. November 22, 1983. Frank Susman, Roselee Adlin, Stephen G. Hamilton, Susan Schermer, St. Louis, for appellants. Michael Wolff, St. Louis, Richard S. Brownlee, II

*1041GOLDEN, Justice. This case presents a substantial evidence question and a narrow question of first impression: Whether the legislature in enacting Wyo.Stat. § 23-1-901 (July 1986)1 which permits a landowner to present a claim to the State Game and Fish Department (Department) for property damages caused by game animals, waived the st

URBIGKIT, Justice. This mineral tax assessment challenge was filed by a very large Wyoming corporate taxpayer in a district court declaratory judgment action. Complex issues were presented by this major oil and gas producer. The complaint named both county and state officials as defendants. As the appellant’s brief states, this appeal “involves the proper method and manner in which the State, County and other named government

675 F.Supp. 594 (1987) SIERRA CLUB, a non-profit corporation; National Parks and Conservation Association, a non-profit organization; Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, a Utah non-profit corporation, and The Wilderness Society, a District of Columbia non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Donald P. HODEL, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; The Department of the Interior of the United States; The Bureau o

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge. PART I In this case, the plaintiffs, who are inmates of the Federal Correctional Institute at Englewood, Colorado, have challenged the interpretation that the Bureau of Prisons has given to the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5005, et seq., h

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu

Opinion PER CURIAM. Dissenting opinion filed by MacKINNON, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from the District Court’s dismissal of a challenge to appellee’s use of the treaty power to convey to the Republic of Panama United States properties, including the Panama Canal, located in the Panama Canal Zone.