Cases

D Dear Mr. Acosta: September 6,2015 Re: Cause No. w11-14842-H(B) My name is Sam Jones the Applicant in the above cause number, my ll.07 writ application is pending in Criminal District Court No.l in Dallas County. The trial court ignors all of my motions and pledings._ Enclosed is a copy of my motion to amend my 11.07 application and memo- randum, l filed such motion in Criminal District Court No.l on this date* due to the fact that that court ignors all of my motions and pledings l mail you a

395 So.2d 1337 (1981) STATE of Louisiana v. Frank MOTTON. No. 80-KA-2104. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 2, 1981. Rehearing Denied April 6, 1981. *1340 William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Sheila Myers, Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plain

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge. Introduction Fidel Amesquita, Georgia Hawthorne, Sara Lane, Rachane Thitakom, and Mary Whiteside (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motions to dismiss of Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation (“GML”) and Eric Asselmeier (“Asselmeier”), Donald Welge (‘Welge”), Anthony Berry (“Berry”), and Gary Lay-ton (“Layton”) (collectively “Employee De

ACCEPTED 05-15-00586-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/21/2015 5:54:39 PM

921 So.2d 1240 (2006) Brenda LEE, Nettie Kirklin, Olga LeBlanc, Darnell Jackson, Lucille Baker, Molly Lewis, Beatrice Brackens, Betty Taylor Jackie Matthews, and Maxine Robinson v. CONSTAR, INC., Art Setty and Dennis Charbonnay. No. 05-CA-633. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. February 14, 2006. Rehearing Denied March 14, 2006.

6 F.3d 531 62 USLW 2308, 126 Lab.Cas. P 33,030,1 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d 1057 Sam HENSON, Jr.; Stanley G. Batten; Kelvin W. Johnson;James Henson; Clarence R. Bond; Steven M. Mates; YvonneScott; Michael W. Martins; Thomas M. Bragg; Russell A.Honda; Hubert Lee Howell; Scott Turner; Lester St JohnGauntt, Appellees,v.PULASKI COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Appellant.James Lee MORGAN;

LILJEBERG, J. *418Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for several felony offenses. For the following reasons, we vacate defendant's convictions and sentences, and we remand the case to the trial court for a new trial. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Defendant, Willard Anthony, was co

LILJEBERG, J. *418Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for several felony offenses. For the following reasons, we vacate defendant's convictions and sentences, and we remand the case to the trial court for a new trial. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Defendant, Willard Anthony, was co

JOHNSON, J. I, Defendant/Appellant, Robert . C. Williams, appeals his convictions and sentences from the 24th Judicial District *375Court, Division “M”. For the following reasons, we affirm, FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 26, 2015, Defendant and 20 other co-defendants were charged in a 36-count indictment for various act

JOHNSON, J. | ¶ Defendant/Appellant, Alcus A. Smith, appeals his convictions and sentences from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division “M”. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 26, 2015, Defendant and 20 other co-defendants were charged in a 30-count indictment for various acts of racketeering committed in furtherance of a narcotics distrib

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge. h Christopher Wells shot and killed Brandon “Big Herb” McCue. Charged with second degree murder, Mr. Wells claimed before the jury that he acted in self-defense. A unanimous jury convicted him of manslaughter, an authorized responsive verdict. The trial judge imposed a sentence of twenty-five years. Mr. Wells appeals both his conviction and his *153

CORRIGAN, J. *744 After a jury convicted defendant Jamelle Edward Armstrong of kidnapping, robbing, raping, torturing, and murdering Penny Sigler, it returned a death verdict. *120

16 So.3d 47 (2009) Shirley ROSS, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2007-KA-01889-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. August 11, 2009. *50 Lisa Mishune Ross, Jackson, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Deirdre McCrory, attorney for appellee. *51

liWALTZER, Judge, concurring. I agree with the majority that the appeal of the manufacturing defendants in 98-CA-0042 is timely. I write separately because I disagree with the majority’s analysis of Motton v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 97-0204 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/19/97), 692 So.2d 6. This Court clearly held in Motton that when the federal court has previously remanded a notice of removal and su

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THOMAS LEE BATTLE, Defendant and Appellant. S119296 San Bernardino County Superior Court FVI012605 July 1, 2021 Justice Cuéllar authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cant

11 SAUNDERS, Judge, dissenting. In this case, the majority affirms a jury’s erroneous conclusion that a tort victim can be held 100% responsible for injuries resulting at least in part from defendant’s knowing failure to provide him with a safe piece of heavy machinery. It does so on two grounds: defendant had no duty to plaintiff to furnish a piece of heavy machinery equipped with a seat b

552 So.2d 738 (1989) Orza Bolourchi WATTS v. Alan Ray WATTS. No. 88 CA 1485. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. November 14, 1989. Donna Wright Lee, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant Ozra Bolourchi Watts. Albert J. Lord, Zachary, for defendant-appellant Alan Ray Watts. Before CARTER, SAVOIE and ALFORD, JJ. CARTER, Judge. This

11 Cal.Rptr.3d 236 (2004) 86 P.3d 302 32 Cal.4th 704 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Dellano Leroy CLEVELAND and Chauncey Jamal Veasley, Defendants and Appellants. No. S024416 Supreme Court of California March 25, 2004 Rehearing Denied June 9, 2004 Certiorari Denied January 10, 2005

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on Mr. Soler’s appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of his request for a new trial and of the court’s award of $3,082.46 in costs to Officer Waite. See Soler v. McHenry, 771 F.Supp. 252 (N.D.Ill.1991). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court. <

NORRIS, Judge. Willie B. Collins was charged by bill of information with simple burglary of a movable, LSA-R.S. 14:62. He proceeded to jury trial and was convicted. The trial judge later denied his motion for a new trial and post verdict judgment of acquittal and sentenced him to ten years at hard labor. Collins now appeals, urging three assignments of error: (1) The trial court should have granted the