Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Muhammed Opere”
Commonwealth v. Muhammedpublic domain
992 A.2d 897 (2010) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Kareem MUHAMMED, Appellant. No. 3113 EDA 2008 Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 18, 2009. Filed March 23, 2010. *898 Jill Heilman, Public Defender, for appellant. Michael Erlich, Asst. Dist. Atty., for Com., appellee. BEFORE
Muhammed Abdullah v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.public domain
OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: The district court certified a class of former and current employees of U.S. Security Associates, Inc. (“USSA”), who allege that USSA committed numerous violations of California labor law. USSA filed a petition to appeal the district court’s certification order, which we granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f). On
Muhammed Y. Ahmed v. Randall R. Mallorypublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00405-CV Muhammad Y. Ahmed, Appellant v. Randall R. Mallory, Appellee FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-09-006375, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Ap
Muhammed Y. Ahmed v. Randall R. Mallorypublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00405-CV Muhammad Y. Ahmed, Appellant v.
Muhammed v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION WIESE, Judge. Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, sues here to recover federal excise taxes paid on inventory purchases of gasoline and diesel fuel that was later resold to a tax-exempt municipal entity. A refund is also claimed for excise taxes paid on fuel inventories that were lost to ground seepage due to the rupture of underground storage tanks following a prolonged period of heavy rain. T
State of Tennessee v. Muhammed Nuriddenpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 16, 2003 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MUHAMMED NURIDDEN1 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 239726 Rebecca J. Stern, Judge No. E2003-00996-CCA-MR3-CD April 20, 2004 The appella
Akbar-El v. Muhammedpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 83 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 84 This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the Ross County Common Pleas Court in favor of Wali Muhammed, David Schwartz, Jeff
United States of America v. Sirree Muhammed Rizapublic domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Sirree Muhammed Riza stole nineteen checks totaling $124,262.49 from his employer, a health care provider in Edina, Minnesota. He deposited the checks in an *758 account he had' secretly opened at TCF Bank, using the assumed name Mandel Tyler. Riza then withdrew the money, usin
United States v. Sirree Muhammed Rizapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-3732 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distr
Muhammed v. United Statespublic domain
635 F.Supp. 1451 (1986) Ishmael MUHAMMED, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. 83 Cr. 150 (MP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 10, 1986. *1452 Ishmael Muhammed, pro se. Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., by Margaret S. Groban, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for respondent.<
LAY, Circuit Judge. Muhammed Abdul was indicted for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and armed drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). He entered guilty pleas to the cocaine and armed drug trafficking charge pursuant to a written plea ag
People v. Muhammedpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Patrick W. McGinley, J. The defendant, Hakim Muhammed, was charged with two counts of assault in the second degree occurring during an incident on 42nd Street and Eighth Avenue on October 15, 1979. New York City Police Officer Robert Westervelt approached the defendant after observing him standing over an elderly man who was lying on the ground. In order to inve
United States v. Jerome Young, A/K/A Akbar Muhammedpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. WALD, Circuit Judge: On December 4, 1989, appellant Jerome Young pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute 100 grams or more of pure phencyclidine (“PCP”), 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(b)(l)(A)(iv), and to use of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The district c
722 S.W.2d 280 (1987) 291 Ark. 29 Wali MUHAMMED, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT COMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Appellee. No. 86-145. Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 12, 1987. Wali Muhammed, Little Rock, pro se. Steve Clark, Atty. Gen. by David S. Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. NEWBERN, Justice
United States v. Roosevelt Winfield, A/K/A Jihad A. Muhammed, United States of America v. Luvenia H. Winfieldpublic domain
OPINION SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge: We review the convictions of Luvenia H. Winfield and her son, Roosevelt Winfield, for various crimes involving drugs proceeds. Both Luvenia and Roosevelt argue that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to support their convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 31 U.S.C. §§ 5322 and 5324 for conspiracy to viol
Greene v. MTA Bus Co.public domain
Greene v MTA Bus Co. (2023 NY Slip Op 04658) Greene v MTA Bus Co. 2023 NY Slip Op 04658 Decided on September 20, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
In Re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashirpublic domain
TATEL, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Since July 2011, Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Al-Nashiri has repeatedly sought to challenge the government’s authority to try him in a military commission. In his view, none of the offenses with which he is charged occurred in the context of an armed conflict and thus none is triable outside of a civilian court. In one of his latest attempts to raise the issue, Al-Nashiri petit
Chowdhury v. Hamza Express Food Corp.public domain
ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, issued on February 26, 2015, is adopted. Today’s hearing confirms the magistrate judge’s findings and rulings of deliberate failure by defendants to keep and present appropriate records and other discovery pursuant to the magistrate judge’s directions and discovery rulings. See Hr’g Tr., June 5, 2015.</
In re Al-Nashiripublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Abd al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed alNashiri (Nashiri) is a detainee at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who is currently being tried by military commission. He asks this Court to resolve, via mandamus, two challenges to the constitutionality of the United States Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR). Our answer is simple
United States v. Alipublic domain
793 F.Supp.2d 386 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ali Muhamed ALI, Defendant. Criminal No. 11-0106(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 24, 2011. Brenda J. Johnson, U.S. Attorney's Office, Jennifer Ellen Levy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Timothy Ryan Clinton, Matthew J. Peed, Clinton & Peed, PLL