Cases

958 A.2d 156 (2008) 289 Conn. 927 Tobias C. ANDERSON v. GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, et al. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided September 25, 2008. Tobias C. Anderson, pro se, in support of the petition. Lorinda S. Coon, Hartford, in opposition. The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn.App. 410,

949 A.2d 488 (2008) 108 Conn.App. 410 Tobias C. ANDERSON v. GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, et al. No. 27984. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 18, 2008. Decided June 17, 2008. *489 Tobias C. Anderson, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Louis B. Blumenfeld, with whom was L

14 N.J. Super. 231 (1951) 81 A.2d 512 ALBERT MUIR AND BESSIE G. MUIR, PLAINTIFFS, v. E. RUSSELL ANDERSON AND MARIE H. ANDERSON, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided May 24, 1951. *232 Mr. Louis B. LeDuc, for the motion. Mr. David L. Horuvitz, contra. WOODS, A.J.S.

2022 UT App 80 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KEVIN MUIR, Appellant, v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. Opinion No. 20210289-CA Filed June 24, 2022 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable Christine S. Johnson

OPINION DIETZEN, Justice. In this consolidated action, appellant KKE Architects, Inc. (KKE), seeks to foreclose its mechanic’s lien, and respondents First Choice Bank and Riverview Muir Doran, LLC, seek to foreclose their mortgages on property that is part of a housing project located in Hennepin County. Respondents moved for partial summary judgment, seeking a determination on the validity of the mechani

336 S.C. 266 (1999) 519 S.E.2d 583 Dale MUIR, Employee/Claimant, Respondent, v. C.R. BARD, INC., Self-Insured Employer, Appellant. No. 3012. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 11, 1999. Decided June 21, 1999. Rehearing Denied August 28, 1999. *274 Grady L. Beard

744 F.Supp.2d 145 (2010) Krishna MUIR, Plaintiff, v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. 03-1193 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 29, 2010. *146 C. Sukari Hardnett, Silver Spring, MD, Clarence Angelo Connelly, Jr., Law Offices *147

783 F.Supp.2d 19 (2010) Krishna MUIR, Plaintiff, v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 03-1193 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 29, 2010. *20 C. Sukari Hardnett, Silver Spring, MD, Clarence Angelo Connelly, Jr., Law Offices of Clarence A. Connelly, Washington, DC, for Plai

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KRISHNA MUIR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) Civil Case No. 03-1193 (RJL) v. ) NA VY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et

FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judge, with whom HATCHETT, ANDERSON, TATE and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting. I dissent because I am convinced that the majority has committed a serious error in applying the law to these cases. The clearly defined issue in these appeals is whether the executive officers of a state operated public television station may cancel a prev

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KRISHNA MUIR, Plaintiff, v Civil Case No. 03-1193 (RJL) NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et al., FILED SEP 2 9 2010 Clerk. u.s. o' n z l Courts for the|§)i{s(t)ric¢:gl gl?r(]}l:)r|ilmbla MEMORANDUM OPINION (Septemberz__°(, 2010) [#87] Defendants. § %/%/S\/\./\./\-/\-/\_/\-/\_/ Plaintiff Krishna Muir brought this action against Navy Federa1 Credit Union ("NFCU") on June 3, 2003. Plaintiff claims that NFCU tortiously set off and convert

WRIGHT, Circuit Judge. We reverse the judgments in both of these appeals. The district courts held that the intermediate care units in the two hospitals qualified for “special care unit” Medicare reimbursement. The Memorial Hospital of Gardena and the John Muir Memorial Hospital established “Maxicare” and “Definite Care” units, respectively, to provide intermediate care to patients who did not require

225 P.3d 1024 (2009) Doyle MUIR, Respondent, v. COUNCIL 2 WASHINGTON STATE COUNCIL OF COUNTY & CITY EMPLOYEES and Local 1849, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Appellant. No. 62380-0-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. December 21, 2009. Publication Ordered February 4, 2010. *1025 Richard J. Hughes, Attorney at Law

529 F.3d 1100 (2008) Krishna MUIR, Appellant v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and Patricia L. Dearing, L.L.C., Appellees. No. 07-7066. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued February 14, 2008. Decided June 20, 2008. *1103 C. Sukari Hardnett argued the cause and filed the briefs for appel

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED June 26, 1998 JUDD’S INCORPORATED, ) COCKE CHANCERY Crowson, Jr. Cecil ) Appellate C ourt Clerk Plaintiff/Appellee ) NO. 03A01-9801

817 A.2d 938 (2003) 149 Md. App. 617 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, Maryland v. Allen MUIR. No. 524, Sept. Term, 2002. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 28, 2003. *940 William D. Evans, Jr., Senior Assistant County Attorney (Linda M. Schuett, County Attorney on the brief), Annapolis, MD, for appellant.<

776 N.W.2d 172 (2009) RIVERVIEW MUIR DORAN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JADT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, et al., Appellants, First Choice Bank, Respondent, Darg, Bolgrean, et al., Defendants, and First Choice Bank, Respondent, v. JADT Development Company, LLC, et al., Appellants, Riverview Muir Doran, LLC, et al., Defendants, and KKE Architects, Inc., Plaintiff, v. JADT Development Company, LLC, et al., Appellants, Firs

Matter of Anderson v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 02199) Matter of Anderson v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 02199 Decided on April 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

Ellington, J. ¶1 Doyle Muir sued his union, alleging breach of the duty of fair representation. Although the undisputed evidence established that the union’s decision not to take his wage grievance to arbitration was not arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith, the superior court denied its motion for summary judgment. We reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 Doyle Muir worked for San Juan

ORDER JEFFREY L. VIKEN, CHIEF JUDGE BACKGROUND Multiple plaintiffs filed this action against defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Docket 6). Each plaintiff was an employee of defendant who was fired in approximately the last five years because of the plaintiffs criminal background information. Id. at pp. 3, 6, 12, 16, 22, 23, 25, 29-30, 32-33, 36 & 39-40; see Docket 12 at p.