Cases

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge HALL and Senior Judge PHILLIPS joined. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: This is a ease brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against Digital Equipment Corporation (Digital) b

87 Cal.App.3d 88 (1978) 150 Cal. Rptr. 797 CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. MASTELOTTO, INC., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Docket No. 3313. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. December 6, 1978. *91 COUNSEL DiGiorgio, Davis & Klein,

ORDER JAMES E. GRITZNER, Senior Judge This matter comes before the court on a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs Pella Corporation, Pella Windows and Doors of Ontario Corporation, and Pella Windows and Doors, Inc. (collectively, Pella). Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty) resists. A hearing on the Motion was held on February 15, 2017. Attorneys Keith McKenna, Marc Lad

SECTION: “J”(4) ORDER AND REASONS CARL J. BARRIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are two 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Rec. Doc. 36; Rec. Doc. 42) filed by Third-Party Defendant Landis Construction Co., L.L.C. (“Landis”), two alternative Motions to Stay Pending Arbitration (Rec. Doc. 39; Rec)

KENNEDY, Judge (concurring in part, dissenting in part). {38} NCR’s unaltered design of the 22-year-old crushing plant would have prevented Chairez’s injury. The alteration critical to causing the injury — removing the plate steel “shield” separating the feed hopper of the crusher from the area where the flywheels rotated — serves no purpose

CYR, Senior Circuit Judge. Gary S. Webber appeals from the district court judgment which was granted to his former employer, International Paper Company (“IP”), as a matter of law notwithstanding the jury verdict which Web-ber obtained on his state-law disability discrimination claim. We affirm the district court judgment. I

794 F.Supp.2d 242 (2011) PRO CON, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. No. 2:10-cv-185-GZS. United States District Court, D. Maine. June 30, 2011. *243 Jeffrey T. Edwards, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau, Pachios & Haley, LLP, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff. Karin McCarthy, Richard Feld

Eldridge, Judge. This is an appeal from the foreclosure judgment for Joe Fletcher of a landlord’s lien on crops against BITT International Company, Inc. (“BITT”), tenant. After a probable cause hearing under OCGA § 44-14-550, the trial court found probable cause for an evidentiary hearing, and BITT posted a bond for $33,000 in lieu of the growing crop; however, the entire crop was lost prior to the evidentiary hearing. <

883 A.2d 399 (2005) 380 N.J. Super. 532 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DELTA PLASTICS CORPORATION and Flexsol Packaging Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 4, 2005. Decided September 30, 2005. *400 Leonar

ALBIN, J., dissenting. The standard of review on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 5-6, 258 A.2d 706 (1969). Had the majority followed that simple admonition and not cast itself as the seventh juror, it would not have set aside the verdict rendered by the jury in favor of plaint

823 A.2d 789 (2003) 176 N.J. 397 Annabelle CRIPPEN, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and General Administratrix of the Estate of Harold Crippen, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL JERSEY CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and Gallo Industries, Inc., XYZ Company, 1-100 (a fictitious name) and/or John Doe (a fictitious name), Defendants. Supreme Court of New Jersey.

595 N.W.2d 751 (1999) REVERE TRANSDUCERS, INC., Appellee, v. DEERE & COMPANY, Appellant. No. 97-1009. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 3, 1999. *754 Larry J. Cohrt and Jim D. DeKoster of Swisher & Cohrt, P.L.C., Waterloo, and Joel S. Carter of Deere & Company, Moline, Illinois, for appellant. Timothy P. Ryan of Ecke

824 F.Supp. 1044 (1992) GOODWALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Howard P. Gooden, Plaintiffs, v. BEERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 1:79-CV-1774-JOF. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. April 2, 1992. *1045 *1046 *1047 Jo

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT McKINNEY, District Judge. The present matter now pends before this Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Robert G. Black, a pro se litigant, has alleged that Defendant Rieth-Riley Construction Co., Inc. (“Rieth-Riley” or “the Company”) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII” or “the Act”). On November

507 S.E.2d 355 (1998) Bobby Ray COMBS v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. Record No. 980024. Supreme Court of Virginia. November 6, 1998. *356 C. Richard Cranwell (H. Keith Moore; Cranwell, Moore & Bullington, on briefs), Roanoke, for appellant. William B. Poff (Frank K. Friedman; Leslie E. Hagie; Woods, Rogers &am;

577 So.2d 65 (1990) The HOME INSURANCE CO. OF ILLINOIS and Beall-Ladymon Corp. v. NATIONAL TEA CO., Bogue Falaya Investments, Ltd., and the Covington Volunteer Firemen's Association, Inc. VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY v. NATIONAL TEA COMPANY, National Supermarkets, Inc. and/or National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., W.H. Reynolds Distributors, Imperial Associated Contractors, Inc., Bolling Oven and Machine Company, John Mykolyk d/b/a J.

958 F.Supp. 721 (1997) Eddie DOMINGUEZ et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al., Defendants. Natividad Correa et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eli Lilly and Company et al., Defendants. Nos. 95-1043 HL, 95-2073 HL. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 21, 1997. *722 *723

690 S.E.2d 322 (2009) Hugh M. CAPERTON, Harman Development Corporation, Harman Mining Corporation, and Sovereign Coal Sales, Inc., Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. A.T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., Elk Run Coal Company, Inc., Independence Coal Company, Inc., Marfork Coal Company, Inc., Performance Coal Company, and Massey Coal Sales Company, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellants. No. 33350. Supreme Court of

518 N.W.2d 372 (1994) Connie GRACEY, As Mother and Next Friend of James Belt; and Connie Gracey, Individually, Appellants, v. HERITAGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 93-916. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 22, 1994. *373 Michael G. Reilly of Perkins, Sacks, Hannan, Reilly & Petersen, Council Bluffs, for appellants. <

293 B.R. 639 (2003) In re E.SPIRE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Debtors. e.Spire Communications, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Morris Plumbing & Electric Co., Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-974 JWV. Adversary No. 02-01418. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. May 9, 2003. *640 *641