Cases

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 899–942 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Filed 4/8/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, B336656 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LA052535) v. RAMIRO MUNOZ, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, M

Filed 8/5/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JEFFRY UMAÑA MUÑOZ et al., Petitioners, v. A171410 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. Petitioners Jeffry Umaña Muñoz and Iliana Perez challenge the employment policy of the Regents of the University of Calif

Opinion FRANSON, J. — Jared M. Villery appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his petition for writ of mandate. The petition sought an order directing personnel at the California Correctional Institution (CCI) in Tehachapi, California, to process his inmate grievances in accordance with applicable regulati

USCA11 Case: 22-10292 Document: 139-1 Date Filed: 06/24/2026 Page: 1 of 73 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10292 ____________________ JOSHUA DUNN, et al.,

Filed 9/6/19; Opinion following transfer from Supreme Court CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, B283921 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA110065) v. NICHOLA

*1057Opinion ALDRICH, J. INTRODUCTION In this opinion, we address two distinct issues arising from a lawsuit against the State of California. The first issue is whether the state’s litigation conduct estops it from raising noncompliance with the claim presentation provisions of the Government Claims Act (the Act) (Gov. Code, §§ 810

DECISION AND ORDER SMITH, District Judge. Plaintiff Michael Kriegel (“Plaintiff’ or “Kriegel”) brings this disability discrimination and First Amendment action against the State of Rhode Island (“State”) and several of its officers (collectively with the State, “Defendants”) for: (I) violation of the Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act (“FEPA”), R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-5-1, et seq.; (II)

37 Cal.Rptr.3d 777 (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 903 Manuel RENTERIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JUVENILE JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Defendant and Respondent. No. C049717. Court of Appeal, Third District. January 18, 2006. *779 The Drivon Law Firm, Stockton, and Davey L. Turner, for P

813 F.Supp.2d 1182 (2011) Joe PARKS, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Paul Beare, John Welty, Janette Redd-Williams, Janice Parten, Jeri Echeverria, and Does 1-50, Defendants. No. 1:09-CV-1314 AWI GSA. United States District Court, E.D. California. April 25, 2011. *1185 Joe Parks, Clovis, CA, pr

MEMORANDUM YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge. The Court conducted a bench trial in the above captioned matter. The record is now closed, and the Court is prepared to render its judgment. This memorandum constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law made pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(1). I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND <

358 F.Supp.2d 936 (2005) Carl Merton IRONS, II, Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON-SOLANO[1], et al., Respondents. No. CV.S-04-0220-LKK GGH P. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 18, 2005. *937 *938 Ann Catherine McClintock, Federal Defenders Office,

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00124-CV ___________________

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 89 OPINION THE COURT. In a trial by jury defendant Munoz was found guilty of three offenses: (1) possession for sale of heroin in violation of section 11500.5 of the Health and Safety Code (count I), (2) possession for sale of seconal in violation of section 11911 of the Health

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment, filed June 7, 2016 (Doc. 34)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on September 21, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendants Rio Arri-ba County, Rio Arriba County Sheriffs Department, and Deputy Gilbert Atencio are ent

Filed 4/28/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (San Joaquin) ---- MANUEL SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ, C095259 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CV-UPI-