Cases

08/08/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 14, 2025 Session INDUSTRIAL BOILER & MECHANICAL CO., INC. v. TYLER ANDREW EVATT ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 21-0126 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor ________

SUPERIOR COURT HAROLD BROTHERS MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. vs. TOWN OF BRAINTREE; SHAWMUT WOODWORKING AND SUPPLY, INC.[1], third-party defendant Docket: 2021-00505 Dates: December 16, 2021

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1508-CT-1198 David, Justice. 1 At issue is whether a general contractor assumed a non-delegable duty of care to keep a worksite safe when it executed the contract in question. Guided by the contract’s plain language and looking at the

Graham, J. The defendant, Insurance Company of the West (Insurance Company), surety for L.A. Fitness International, LLC (L.A. Fitness), appeals from summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Superior Mechanical Plumbing and Heating, Inc. (Superior), on Superior’s claim to enforce a mechanic’s lien pursuant to G. L. c. 254, § 4. Superior performed plumbing work under a subcontract with PinnCon LLC (PinnCon), the general contra

62 B.R. 873 (1986) In re ALLIED MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING CORP., Debtor, Plaintiff, v. DYNAMIC HOSTELS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO., INC., Mundo Developers, Ltd., and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 85 B 20583, 86 Adv. No. 6025. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. July 7, 1986. *874

Curtin, J. This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C appeal by defendant Fineberg Management, Inc. (“Fineberg”) of the entry of summary judgment in *110favor of plaintiff Mechanical Service Engineers, Inc. (“MSE”), and of the denial of Fineberg’s motions to amend its counterclaim and to substitute another party as defendant. By complaint dated Janu

The Levay Court further explained that the theory of injury did "not concern the price of the insurance policy per se ," but was that "consumers were 'duped' into joining AARP and paying membership fees in order to access the AARP-branded polices from UnitedHealth," without being told that AARP made "a commission on each sale" and had this ulterior motive to recommend the policies. See Levay ,

Welsh, J. This is an action for property damages to a motor vehicle which was oper-áted by the defendant while in the employ of the plaintiff in St Thomas, Virgin Islands.1 The judge found for the plaintiff on the negligence count and awarded damages of $685.35. Judgment was entered on September 13,1996. 1. Although a notice of appeal was seasonably filed and an E

Matter of 9F Inc. Sec. Litig. (2025 NY Slip Op 00482) Matter of 9F Inc. Sec. Litig. 2025 NY Slip Op 00482 Decided on January 30, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) HECO Pacific Manufacturing, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63217 ) Under Contract No. N62470-13-D-4018 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Casey J. McKinnon, Esq. Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC

Opinion issued March 2, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00755-CV ——————————— TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC., Appellant V. NORTHERN PRIDE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Appellee

Perretta, J. On May 22, 1984, Mechanical Coordinators Corp. (Mechanical) brought a motion under Dist.Mun.Cts. R.Civ.P. 60(b),1 seeking relief from a judgment and execution thereon obtained by Air Purchases, Inc. (Air Purchases), on March 11 and May 2,1983, respectively. Mechanical’s motion was heard on June 8,1984, and taken under advisement. While a decision on that matter was pending, Air Purchases, o

Williams, P.J. The plaintiff, HRI Services, Inc. (“HRI”), appeals from the allowance of the motion of the defendants, Stephen Simmons and Thomas Zagami (together, “Simmons”), to dismiss HRI’s appeal under Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A, for the failure of its notice of appeal to comply with the requirements of Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 3(c). Because Simmons had simultaneously filed an objection to the Rule 8A appeal

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IX PROFESSIONAL TRUCK Revisión procedente PARTS, INC. de la Junta de Subastas del Recurrente Municipio Autónomo

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FORTILINE, INC. and PATRIOT ) SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Consolidated v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0211-MTZ ) HAYNE MCCALL, CHRISTOPHER ) ANTOS

Affirmed and Opinion Filed March 13, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00219-CV SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant V. GARRETT KALLUS, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

[Cite as Aronoff v. PAJ Ents., Inc., 2022-Ohio-1759.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA BRUCE ARNOFF, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 110714 v. : PAJ ENTERPRISES, LLC,

ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge This matter, one of a series of actions brought pro se by Dr. Griffin,1 is before *1320the Court on Rule 11 grounds. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. The Court held a hearing on June 28, 2016 to explain Rule 11 and its implications to Dr. Griffin and to hear her side of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C. SUKARI HARDNETT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 24-01534 (AHA) v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., Defendant. Memorandum Opinion and Order Two D.C. homeowners su

[Cite as Oeffner v. Marc Glassman, Inc., 2025-Ohio-1610.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: VIVIAN OEFFNER : Hon. Andrew J. King, P.J. : Hon. Robert G, Montgomery, J.