Cases

16 P.3d 191 (2001) Andy N. RITTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. A-6983. Court of Appeals of Alaska. January 19, 2001. *192 Kathleen A. Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, and Barbara K. Brink, Public Defender, Anchorage, for Appellant. Marcelle K. McDannel, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Special Prose

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Coalition for Equal Rights, Inc. (Coalition) and Shari Warren, d/b/a Spirit Keeper, appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Governor of the State of Colorado and other Colorado state officials on plaintiffs’ claims challenging the constitutionality of Colorado’s Clean Indoor Air Act. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

517 F.3d 1195 (2008) COALITION FOR EQUAL RIGHTS, INC., a Colorado corporation; Shari Warren, doing business as Spirit Keeper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill RITTER, Jr., Governor, State of Colorado; John Suthers, Colorado Attorney General; Donald Mares, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Peter Weir, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Public Safety, James Martin, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Publ

Per Curiam. R.C. 5739.33 provided during the audit period: “If any corporation required to file returns and to remit tax due to the state under the provisions of sections 5739.01 to 5739.31, inclusive, of the Revised Code, fails for any reason to make such filing or payment, any of its officers, or employees having control or supervision of or charged with the responsibility of filing returns and making payments, sha

186 Mich. App. 701 (1991) 464 N.W.2d 919 PEOPLE v. RITTER Docket No. 116685. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided January 8, 1991, at 9:30 A.M. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Gay Secor Hardy, Solicitor General, Norman W. Donker, Prosecuting Attorney, and John K. Bunce, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for th

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Eliot M. Alport (debtor) filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court 2 for the Eastern District of Missouri on September 16, 1992. Jerry E. Ritter and Margaret A. Ritter (the Ritters) timely brought an adversary proceeding asserting the nondischargeab

PITTMAN, Judge. Kaylea Jill (Ritter) Muellen (“the mother”) and Hollis Talmadge (Tab) Ritter (“the father”) were divorced by the Houston Circuit Court in 2004. The divorce judgment awarded the mother sole physical custody of the parties’ three minor children and ordered the father to pay child support. In May 2009, the mother properly notified the father that she and the minor children would be moving from Houston County in Ju

[Cite as State v. Murphy, 2020-Ohio-4667.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.

Alok Ahuja, Judge The Secretary of State certified Initiative Petition 2018-048 for inclusion on the November 2018 general election ballot. The Initiative Petition proposes to amend various provisions of Article III of the Missouri Constitution, which addresses the legislative department, and add three new sections to Article III. Respondents and Cross-Appellants Paul Ritter and Daniel P. Mehan filed this lawsuit in the Circuit Co

920 S.W.2d 151 (1996) Rhonda K. RITTER, Respondent, v. Dwight K. RITTER, Appellant. Rhonda K. RITTER, Respondent, v. Dwight K. RITTER, Appellant. Nos. WD 51113, WD 51414. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. Submitted January 11, 1996. Decided April 16, 1996. *154 James D. Worthington, Lexingt

Opinion COOPER, P. J. INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Parties The Churchill is a 110-unit, 13-story condominium building in the “Wilshire Corridor” in the Westwood area of Los Angeles, California. Defendant and appellant (The Churchill) is a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation. The individual defendant

OPINION CRONE, Judge. Case Summary Hi-Tec Properties, LLC (“Hi-Tec”), appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to correct error following a jury verdict and award of compensatory and punitive damages entered in favor of Brittany Murphy, Kendall Murphy, Lorie Murphy, and Jay Frazier (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on their claim

745 N.E.2d 828 (2001) Ira C. RITTER and The Kroger Co., Appellants-Defendants, v. Jerry STANTON and Ruth A. Stanton, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 49A02-9912-CV-883. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 14, 2001. *832 Karl L. Mulvaney, David C. Campbell, Nana Quay-Smith, Candace L. Sage, Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman LLP, Julia B

895 S.W.2d 604 (1995) CURT OGDEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY and Curt Ogden, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. MURPHY LEASING COMPANY, INC., n.k.a. Ogden Modulars, Inc., Gary Murphy, and Maria Montgomery, Defendants/Appellants. No. 64655. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. February 28, 1995. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied April 3, 1995.

SMITH, Presiding Judge. Defendants appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict against them in an intersectional automobile case. Defendants’ main point, framed both in reference to the motion for directed verdict and the verdict-directing instruction, is that the evidence did not support plaintiffs’ humanitarian case. We review the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. Plaintiff Donn

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), rendered February 22, 2006, as amended February 24, 2006, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and unlawful possession of noxious material, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed. The defendan

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J), rendered April 26, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d

Proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with a criminal action entitled People v Willoughby pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment Nos. 80448/06 and 3453/ 07. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person. Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered March 2, 1987, awarding plaintiff temporary maintenance of $10,000 per month retroactive for six months to the date of the application therefor, and directing defendant either personally or through the Barbizon Corporation to pay for the plaintiff’s medical insurance, unreimbursed medical expenses, and for plaintiff’s household, disability, workers’ compensation and automobile in

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for damage to property, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Sweeny, J.), entered March 8, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability (Hickman, J., at trial), and upon the denial of their motion, inter aha, pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against them, dismissing the complaint. Ordered that