Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Muzak Holdings LLC, et al.”
443 B.R. 320 (2010) In re PREMIER INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Debtors. Six Flags, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Parc Management, LLC, Parc Operations, LLC, Parc 7F-Operations Corporation, Parc Elitch Gardens, LLC, Parc White Water Bay, LLC, Parc Frontier City, LLC, Parc Splashtown, LLC, Parc Waterworld, LLC, and Parc Enchanted Parcs, LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-12019 (CSS). Adversary No. 10-50061 (CSS). <
Matter of TBA Global, LLC v. Fidus Partners, LLCpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Friedman, J.P. Petitioner acquired a failing business pursuant to an asset purchase agreement that specifically excludes from the assets and liabilities being transferred to the buyer any “brokerage or finders’ fees ... or other similar payments” owed by the seller. The asset purchase agreement further specifically provides that the seller and the buyer will each bear its own “Transac
Delaware Trust Co. v. Energy Future Intermediate Holding Co. (In Re Energy Future Holdings Corp.)public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge We address what happens when one provision'of an indenture for money loaned provides that the debt is accelerated if the debtor files for bankruptcy and while in bankruptcy it opts to redeem that debt when another indenture provision provides for a redemption premium. Does the pre
Marin v. Constitution Realty, LLCpublic domain
Andrias and Gische, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part in a memorandum by Andrias, J., as follows: This appeal involves a fee-sharing dispute between nonparty appellant, Sheryl Menkes, Esq., the attorney of record for plaintiffs in this personal injury action, and the successive attorneys she retained to act as cocounsel. The action was settled for $8,000,000.
Cronos Group Ltd. v. XComIP, LLCpublic domain
Cronos Group Ltd. v XComIP, LLC (2017 NY Slip Op 06515) Cronos Group Ltd. v XComIP, LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 06515 Decided on September 19, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Friedman, J.P.
Delaware Trust Co. v. Energy Future Intermediate Holding Co. (In re Energy Future Holdings Corp.)public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 Sontchi, J. I.Introduction & Procedural History 2 1. This adversary proceeding relates to a series of 10% First Lien Notes issued by Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC and EFIH Finance Inc., with original maturity of 2020,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment (the “Motions”) filed in the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the “Adversary Proceeding”) and with respect to an administrative expense claim filed against the debtors (the “Debtors”) in the
Teliman Holding Corp. v. VCW Assoc.public domain
Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. (2022 NY Slip Op 07017) Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. 2022 NY Slip Op 07017 Decided on December 08, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Teliman Holding Corp. v. VCW Assoc.public domain
Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. (2022 NY Slip Op 07017) Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. 2022 NY Slip Op 07017 Decided on December 08, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Town of Colonie v. Global Contr. & Painting, Inc.public domain
Town of Colonie v Global Contr. & Painting, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 01986) Town of Colonie v Global Contr. & Painting, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 01986 Decided on April 3, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York Stat
Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives v. United States Department of the Treasurypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-01974 (TNM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al., Defendants, DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. MEMORANDUM
333 F.Supp.2d 215 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Applications of MUZAK, LLC, et al. and DMX Music, Inc., et al., Applicants, For the Determination of Reasonable Licensing Fees. Civ.A. No. 41-1395(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 3,
Zollo v. Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc.public domain
Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 01225) Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 01225 Decided on March 7, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Re
Zollo v. Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc.public domain
Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 01225) Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 01225 Decided on March 7, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Re
323 F.Supp.2d 588 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Applications of Muzak, LLC, et al. and DMX Music, Inc., et al., Applicants, For the Determination of Reasonable Licensing Fees. No. CIV.A. 41-1395(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 2, 2004.
The Resource Group International Limited v. Chishtipublic domain
23-286 The Resource Group International Limited et al. v. Chishti 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term 2023 7 Argued: September 18, 2023 8 Decided: January 22, 2024 9 10 No. 23-286 11 12
309 F.Supp.2d 566 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Applications of Muzak, LLC, et al. and DMX Music, Inc., et al., Applicants, For the Determination of Reasonable Licensing Fees. No. CIV.A. 41-1395(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 17, 200
Pernix Ir. Pain Dac v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.public domain
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE In this order, the Court addresses a dispute between the parties over the admissibility of certain exhibits that the plaintiffs (collectively, "Pernix") intend to offer at trial. Defendant Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. ("Alvogen") contends that the materials are inadmissible as hearsay. Pernix argues that the materials in dispute are non-hearsay and can be used to cross-examine Alvogen'
Macy's Inc. v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Sweeny, J. The case before us involves two contracts and three well-known corporate entities. The first contract is between plaintiffs, Macy’s, Inc. and Macy’s Merchandising Group (collectively, Macy’s), and former defendant Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (MSLO). The second contract is between MSLO and defendant J.C. Penney Corporat
City of Buffalo City Sch. Dist. v. LPCiminelli, Inc.public domain
City of Buffalo City Sch. Dist. v LPCiminelli, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 01832) City of Buffalo City Sch. Dist. v LPCiminelli, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 01832 Decided on March 16, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Publi