⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Muzak Holdings LLC, et al.”

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010-11-19 · Published · cited 1× · 443 B.R. 320; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 3957
443 B.R. 320 (2010) In re PREMIER INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Debtors. Six Flags, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Parc Management, LLC, Parc Operations, LLC, Parc 7F-Operations Corporation, Parc Elitch Gardens, LLC, Parc White Water Bay, LLC, Parc Frontier City, LLC, Parc Splashtown, LLC, Parc Waterworld, LLC, and Parc Enchanted Parcs, LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-12019 (CSS). Adversary No. 10-50061 (CSS). <
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-09-01 · Published · cited 21× · 132 A.D.3d 195; 15 N.Y.S.3d 769
OPINION OF THE COURT Friedman, J.P. Petitioner acquired a failing business pursuant to an asset purchase agreement that specifically excludes from the assets and liabilities being transferred to the buyer any “brokerage or finders’ fees ... or other similar payments” owed by the seller. The asset purchase agreement further specifically provides that the seller and the buyer will each bear its own “Transac
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-11-17 · Published · cited 41× · 842 F.3d 247
OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge We address what happens when one provision'of an indenture for money loaned provides that the debt is accelerated if the debtor files for bankruptcy and while in bankruptcy it opts to redeem that debt when another indenture provision provides for a redemption premium. Does the pre
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-05-19 · Published · cited 4× · 128 A.D.3d 505; 11 N.Y.S.3d 550
Andrias and Gische, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part in a memorandum by Andrias, J., as follows: This appeal involves a fee-sharing dispute between nonparty appellant, Sheryl Menkes, Esq., the attorney of record for plaintiffs in this personal injury action, and the successive attorneys she retained to act as cocounsel. The action was settled for $8,000,000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-09-19 · Published · cited 80× · 2017 NY Slip Op 6515; 156 A.D.3d 54; 64 N.Y.S.3d 180; 2017 WL 4125643
Cronos Group Ltd. v XComIP, LLC (2017 NY Slip Op 06515) Cronos Group Ltd. v XComIP, LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 06515 Decided on September 19, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Friedman, J.P.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 527 B.R. 178; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 979
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 Sontchi, J. I.Introduction & Procedural History 2 1. This adversary proceeding relates to a series of 10% First Lien Notes issued by Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC and EFIH Finance Inc., with original maturity of 2020,
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 19× · 533 B.R. 379
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment (the “Motions”) filed in the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the “Adversary Proceeding”) and with respect to an administrative expense claim filed against the debtors (the “Debtors”) in the
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-12-08 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 NY Slip Op 07017
Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. (2022 NY Slip Op 07017) Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. 2022 NY Slip Op 07017 Decided on December 08, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-12-08 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 NY Slip Op 07017
Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. (2022 NY Slip Op 07017) Teliman Holding Corp. v VCW Assoc. 2022 NY Slip Op 07017 Decided on December 08, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-04-03 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 01986
Town of Colonie v Global Contr. & Painting, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 01986) Town of Colonie v Global Contr. & Painting, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 01986 Decided on April 3, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York Stat
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-01974 (TNM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al., Defendants, DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. MEMORANDUM
District Court, S.D. New York · 2004-09-03 · Published · cited 2× · 333 F. Supp. 2d 215; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17777; 2004 WL 1962083
333 F.Supp.2d 215 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Applications of MUZAK, LLC, et al. and DMX Music, Inc., et al., Applicants, For the Determination of Reasonable Licensing Fees. Civ.A. No. 41-1395(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 3,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-03-07 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 01225
Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 01225) Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 01225 Decided on March 7, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Re
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-03-07 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 01225
Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 01225) Zollo v Adirondack Lodges Homeowners Assn., Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 01225 Decided on March 7, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Re
District Court, S.D. New York · 2004-07-02 · Published · cited 9× · 323 F. Supp. 2d 588; 37 A.L.R. 6th 745; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13218; 2004 WL 1496644
323 F.Supp.2d 588 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Applications of Muzak, LLC, et al. and DMX Music, Inc., et al., Applicants, For the Determination of Reasonable Licensing Fees. No. CIV.A. 41-1395(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 2, 2004.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-01-22 · Published · cited 10× · 91 F.4th 107
23-286 The Resource Group International Limited et al. v. Chishti 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term 2023 7 Argued: September 18, 2023 8 Decided: January 22, 2024 9 10 No. 23-286 11 12
District Court, S.D. New York · 2004-03-17 · Published · cited 14× · 309 F. Supp. 2d 566; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4615; 2004 WL 549446
309 F.Supp.2d 566 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Applications of Muzak, LLC, et al. and DMX Music, Inc., et al., Applicants, For the Determination of Reasonable Licensing Fees. No. CIV.A. 41-1395(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 17, 200
District Court, D. Delaware · 2018-06-08 · Published · cited 2× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 816
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE In this order, the Court addresses a dispute between the parties over the admissibility of certain exhibits that the plaintiffs (collectively, "Pernix") intend to offer at trial. Defendant Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. ("Alvogen") contends that the materials are inadmissible as hearsay. Pernix argues that the materials in dispute are non-hearsay and can be used to cross-examine Alvogen'
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-02-26 · Published · cited 40× · 127 A.D.3d 48; 6 N.Y.S.3d 7
OPINION OF THE COURT Sweeny, J. The case before us involves two contracts and three well-known corporate entities. The first contract is between plaintiffs, Macy’s, Inc. and Macy’s Merchandising Group (collectively, Macy’s), and former defendant Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (MSLO). The second contract is between MSLO and defendant J.C. Penney Corporat
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-03-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 1832
City of Buffalo City Sch. Dist. v LPCiminelli, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 01832) City of Buffalo City Sch. Dist. v LPCiminelli, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 01832 Decided on March 16, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Publi