Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Myles P. Rutledge”
State v. Mylespublic domain
389 So.2d 12 (1979) STATE of Louisiana v. Elvin MYLES. No. 63567. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 25, 1979. On Rehearing October 6, 1980. *15 Lonny A. Myles, Hammond, for defendant-appellant. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Duncan Kemp, III, Dist. Atty., Joseph Simps
Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Great Lakes Crushing, Ltd.public domain
[Cite as Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Great Lakes Crushing, Ltd., 2013-Ohio-5654.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO SHELLY MATERIALS, INC., : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee/ : Cross-Appellant, CASE NO. 2013-P-0016
United States v. Valentinepublic domain
856 F.Supp. 621 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dale VALENTINE, Jim's Water Service, Inc., Phillips Petroleum Company, Inc., Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc., True Oil Company, Richard J. Wallace, Conoco Pipe Line Company, Eighty-Eight Oil Company, Valentine Construction Company, Inc., and William Valentine and Sons, Defendants. No. 93-CV-1005-J. United States District Court, D. Wyomin
Hardison v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.public domain
DIETZ, Judge. Plaintiff Rexford D. Hardison appeals from the Industrial Commission's opinion and award denying his workers' compensation claims. Initially, Defendants Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance accepted and began paying Hardison's claim, which involved an umbilical hernia. Hardison told Defendants that the hernia occurred at work and that he had never had any previous hernias or similar injuries.</
United States v. Valentinepublic domain
856 F.Supp. 627 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dale VALENTINE, et al., Defendants. No. 93CV1005J. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. June 2, 1994. *628 *629 David Freudenthal, U.S. Atty., Cheyenne, WY, David Kubichek, Asst. U.S. Atty., Casper, WY, Myles Flint, Anna Thode
State v. Washingtonpublic domain
WARD, Judge. These consolidated appeals present issues concerning the constitutional requirements for obtaining a search warrant. Appellants are Myles Washington, who pleaded guilty to possession of heroin and to being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, and Linda Burton, who pleaded guilty to possession of heroin. Washington was sentenced to eight years imprisonment and fined $5,000.00 or one y
Potomac Small Loan Co. v. Mylespublic domain
CAYTON, Associate Judge. Plaintiff appeals from an order of dismissal for want of prosecution. The action, which was on a. promissory note, was within the $50 limitation; hence it was filed in the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Municipal Court, where exclusive jurisdiction is reposed in claims of that size.1 When the case was called on the return day plaintiff answered by attorney; d
United States v. Valentinepublic domain
885 F.Supp. 1506 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dale VALENTINE, Jim's Water Service, Inc., Phillips Petroleum Company, Inc., Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc., True Oil Company, Richard J. Wallace, Conoco Pipe Line Company, Eighty-Eight Oil Company, Valentine Construction Company, Inc., and William Valentine and Sons, Defendants. No. 93-CV-1005-J. United States District Court, D. Wyomi
People v. McIntoshpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Cheeley v. Hendersonpublic domain
Hunt, Justice, dissenting. Justice Weltner’s position that certiorari should be vacated is entirely correct. I write separately only to say that since certiorari was not vacated, we should at least confine our resolution of the case to the issues on appeal. The adequacy of the affidavit was not among those issues. No enumeration of error nor any argument involved the affidavit. This is not surprising, however
John Doe I v. Nestle, USApublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE I; JOHN DOE II; JOHN DOE No. 10-56739 III, individually and on behalf of proposed class members; GLOBAL D.C. No. EXCHANGE, 2:05-CV-05133- Plaintiffs-Appellants, SVW-JTL v. ORDER AND NESTLE USA, INC.; ARCHER OPINION DANIELS MIDLAND
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
State v. Carmouchepublic domain
480 So.2d 728 (1985) STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph Floyd CARMOUCHE, Jr. No. 85-KA-0119. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 21, 1985. *729 William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morgan Goudeau, Dist. Atty., David Miller, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee. Edward Lopez, Thomas DeJean,
Klondike Industries Corp. v. Gibsonpublic domain
741 P.2d 1161 (1987) KLONDIKE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION and Wiley F. Beaux, individually, Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Myles F. GIBSON and Bernice Gibson, husband and wife, Appellees and Cross-Appellants. Nos. S-1348, S-1432. Supreme Court of Alaska. August 14, 1987. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 6, 1987.
Griffin v. Jonespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge, United States District Court This matter is before the Court on competing motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff David Griffin has filed a motion for summary judgment on all of Defendant Charles Jones’s remaining counterclaims. (DN 154). Jones has also filed a motion for summary judgment on these counterclaims. (DN 161). The parties have compl
State v. Washingtonpublic domain
TATE, Justice. The defendant appeals his convictions on two counts of violations of La.R.S. 40:966, the possession of heroin with intent to distribute (Count 1) and the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute (Count 2). The sole assignment of error is directed at the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the drugs as unconstitutionally seized. The drugs were found and seized as a result o
United States v. Rosariopublic domain
PARKER, Circuit Judge: Appellants appeal from judgments of conviction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Shirley Wohl Kram, Judge) entered on several dates between September 21, 1994 and December 27,1994. I. BACKGROUND Appellants were convicted for their participation in a large-scale heroin drug conspiracy ring operated in the greater New York c
State v. Clarkpublic domain
332 So.2d 236 (1976) STATE of Louisiana v. Billy Clay CLARK. No. 57342. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 17, 1976. *237 Lonny A. Myles, 21st Judicial Dist., Amite, for defendant-appellant. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard E. Yokum, Dist. Atty., William M. Quin, Asst. Dist. Atty.
State v. Pruittpublic domain
482 So.2d 820 (1986) STATE of Louisiana v. James PRUITT. No. KA-2918. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. January 15, 1986. Rehearing Denied February 26, 1986. *821 John W. Porterfield, Dirks & Porterfield, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant James Pruitt. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen.,
State v. Guidrypublic domain
395 So.2d 764 (1981) STATE of Louisiana v. Dennis GUIDRY. No. 80-K-2306. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 2, 1981. Lonny A. Myles, Myles & Tregle, Ltd., Hammond, for defendant-relator. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Kay Kirkpatrick, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-respondent. LE