Cases

L. Scott Coogler, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiffs, the Alabama State Conference of the NAACP ("the Alabama NAACP"), Eric Calhoun, and Jennifer Ford, bring this action against Defendants, City of Pleasant Grove ("Pleasant Grove"), Jerry Brasseale in his official capacity as Mayor of Pleasant Grove, and William Bullion, James Crumpton, Kenneth Hatfield, Phillip Houston, and Pau

*214Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion for the court, in which Judge WYNN and Judge FLOYD joined except as to Part V.B. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion for the court as to Part V.B., in which Judge FLOYD joined. Judge MOTZ wrote a separate dissenting opinion as to Part V.B. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, writing for

23-7640 Reyes v. City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2024 No. 23-7640 SEANPAUL REYES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,

20-1809-cv Dorce v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: January 27, 2021 Decided: June 23, 2021 Docket No. 20-1809-cv MCCONNELL DORCE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CECILIA JONES, individually and on beh

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–100 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 23, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

OPINION AND ORDER KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiffs Citizens Union of the City of New York and Citizens Union Foundation, Inc. of the City of New York (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action to challenge the constitutionality of New York Executive Law Sections 172-e and 172-f (the “Disclosure Provisions”). Currently pending before this Court is a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-2340(EGS) JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs the States of New York, Hawaii, and New Jersey; the City of New York; and the City and County of S

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3166 PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES; LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD; COMMON CAUSE PENNSYLVANIA; BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT; MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA; BARRY M. SEASTEAD; MARLENE G. GUTIERREZ; AYNNE MARGARET PLEBAN POLINSKI; JOEL BENCAN; L

OPINION AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded Floyd and Ligón to the District Court to resolve pending motions to intervene in these actions and to “effectuate a settlement” between “such concerned or interested parties as the District Court deems appropriate.” Floyd, ECF No. 426; Ligon, ECF

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1092 NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; CHAPEL HILL- CARRBORO NAACP; GREENSBORO NAACP; HIGH POINT NAACP; MOORE COUNTY NAACP; STOKES COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP; WINSTON SALEM – FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. KEN

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I.INTRODUCTION & FACTUAL BACKGROUND The state of Alabama selects appellate judges using at-large elections. This means that every Alabamian eligible to vote can do so with respect to every seat on the state appellate courts, regardless of residence, as opposed to having their votes limited by geogr

OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On March 28, 2013, this Court issued the second part of its ruling on the parties’ motions for summary judgment.1 The March 28 Opinion noted that plaintiffs had offered “[a] sample of decline to prosecute forms [‘DP forms’] from various District Attorney’s offices” in suppor

OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................332 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................335 III. LEGAL STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT........................337 IV. MONELL LIABILITY..................................

Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2561The Secretary of Commerce decided to reinstate a question about citizenship on the 2020 census questionnaire. A group of plaintiffs challenged that decision on constitutional and statutory grounds. We now decide whether the Secretary violated the Enumeration Clause of the Const

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This putative class action challenges the policies and practices that the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) and the New York City Housing Authority (“NY-CHA”) use to enforce prohibitions against trespassing on public housing property. The lawsuit alleges that defendants’ actions have result

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. After the close of fact discovery and as they are preparing their summary judgment briefs, the parties have presented the Court with the latest in a long line of discovery disputes. On May 11, 2012, plaintiffs asked the Court to order production of the NYPD Housing Bureau’s Reports of Self-Initiated Cases (“Report

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334

812 F.Supp.2d 333 (2011) Kelton DAVIS, William Turner, Altagracia Hernandez, Edwin Larregui, Roman Jackson, Kristin Johnson, Eleanor Britt, Anthony Anderson, Lashaun Smith, Shawne Jones, Hector Suarez, Adam Cooper, Andrew Washington, P.L. by His Parent Lisa Piggott, David Wilson, and Geneva Wilson, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK and New York City Housing Authority, Defen

WINTER, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the validity of regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”). The statutory authority for these regulations is Section 1008, 42 U.S.C. § 300a-6, of Title X of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300 to 300a-41 (1982 & Supp. V 1987) (“Title X”). Section 1008 states: “None of the funds appropriated under this subchapter shall be us