⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “NANCY LEE BRATCHER”

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 1992-02-12 · Published · cited 14× · 823 S.W.2d 719; 1992 WL 4897
823 S.W.2d 719 (1992) EMPLOYERS* CASUALTY COMPANY, Successor In Interest to Texas Employers' Insurance Association, Appellant, v. Wanda BRATCHER, Qualified Community Survivor of the Estate of Stacy Lee Bratcher, Deceased and as Next Friend of Scott Stacy Bratcher, a minor, Appellee. No. 08-91-00173-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. January 15, 1992. Rehea
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00717-CV 3677007 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:35:57 AM
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002-03-27 · Published · cited 1× · 765 N.E.2d 625; 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 461; 2002 WL 461975
OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. Mark R. Passmore, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eva L. Pass-more, and individually ("Passmore"), appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Lee Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities, Inc. ("LAB"). Passmore presents five issues for review, which we restate as the following one dis-positive issue: Whether the trial court erred when it found that Indiana d
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002-05-22 · Published · cited 25× · 286 F.3d 1040
RILEY, Circuit Judge. Coralyn Anne Brown (Brown) prevailed on her claim that her former employer, Lester E. Cox Medical Centers (Cox), discriminated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA). The district court 1 denied Cox’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, but granted Cox’s
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2005 OK 57; 174 P.3d 550; 2005 Okla. LEXIS 115; 2005 WL 1645772
174 P.3d 550 (2005) 2005 OK 57 In the Matter of SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION for NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2004. No. SCBD-5076. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. June 27, 2005. ORDER OF SUSPENSION JOSEPH M. WATT, Chief Justice. ¶ 01 This matter c
Key v. Piercepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999-12-02 · Published · cited 25× · 8 S.W.3d 704; 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 8962; 1999 WL 1081501
8 S.W.3d 704 (1999) Kevin KEY, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Dallas-Fidelity National Title Agency, Inc., Lrt Record Services, Inc., Andrew Jopling, Valerie Jopling, Appellants and Appellees, v. Stewart PIERCE, Appellee and Appellant. No. 2-98-165-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. December 2, 1999. *705 Law, Sn
People v. Lewispublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015-04-23 · Published · cited 23× · 2015 IL App (1st) 122411
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court People v. Lewis, 2015 IL App (1st) 122411 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption ANDRE LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Fifth Division Docket No. 1-12-2411 Filed February 27, 2015 Rehearing
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998-05-26 · Published · cited 21× · 968 S.W.2d 686; 1998 Mo. LEXIS 45; 1998 WL 261534
WHITE, Judge. A jury convicted defendant Ernest Lee Johnson of three counts of murder in the first degree. The jury recommended the sentence of death for each of the three convictions. The trial court sentenced Johnson in accordance with the jury’s recommendation. Johnson’s pro se Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief and the amended motion filed by appointed counsel were overruled after an evidentiary hearing. This Cour
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-05-26 · Published · cited 12× · 857 F.3d 1101; 2017 WL 2296875
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. Unable to win the consent of all necessary landowners, a public utility company now contends that it has a statutory right to condemn a right-of-way on two parcels of land in New Mexico. Because federal law does not permit condemnation of tribal land, the Navajo Nation’s ownership of undivided fractional interests in the parcels presents a problem for th
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-12-01 · Published · cited 0× · 275 F. Supp. 3d 1273
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING COUNTERCLAIM ASSERTED BY INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS James A. Parker, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On September 15, 2015, Plaintiff Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) filed PLAINTIFF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM (Doc. No. 37) (Motion). On September 22, 2015, Defendants Lorraine J. Barboah, Laura H. Chaco, Benjamin A.
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-12-01 · Published · cited 0× · 155 F. Supp. 3d 1151; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174900; 2015 WL 9598913
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS THE NAVAJO NATION AND ALLOTMENT NUMBERS 1160 AND 1392 JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On June 13, 2015, Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) filed a COMPLAINT FOR CONDEMNATION (Doc. No. 1) seeking a perpetual easement for electrical transmission lines. (See Complaint Exs. 2-6; ¶ 37.) PNM brought this
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 167 F. Supp. 3d 1248; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31987; 2016 WL 877951
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER DISMISSING NAVAJO NATION AND ALLOTMENT NUMBERS 1160 AND 1392 JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) asks the Court to alter or *1253amend its MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Reep v. Statepublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013-12-26 · Published · cited 2× · 2013 ND 253; 841 N.W.2d 664; 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20004; 2013 WL 6835003; 2013 N.D. LEXIS 259
SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Several owners of land next to navigable waters in North Dakota appeal from summary judgments determining the State owns the mineral interests under the land in the shore zone, the area between the ordinary high and low watermarks of the navigable waters. We conclude that the State owned the mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upo
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00735-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/20/2015 1:49:45 PM
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 3887778 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1