⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “NCAA v. Governor of New Jersey”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019-09-24 · Published · cited 12× · 939 F.3d 597
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 18-3550 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, an unincorporated association doing business as MAJO
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568, and 14-4569 _____________ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-10-14 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568 & 14-4569 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, an unincorporated association
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 23-2598 _______________ CORECIVIC, INC. v. GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, Appellants _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for
Haw v. NCAApublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
Brandon Haw v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 866, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISIDICTION OVER NONRESIDENT ENTITY In this case, a Maryland resident brought suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), an unincorporated association of colleges and universities that issues and enforces rules governing college athletics. The plaintiff alleges that he suffers from neurodegenerative brain disease caused by repeated h
Haw v. NCAApublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
Brandon Haw v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 866, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISIDICTION OVER NONRESIDENT ENTITY In this case, a Maryland resident brought suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), an unincorporated association of colleges and universities that issues and enforces rules governing college athletics. The plaintiff alleges that he suffers from neurodegenerative brain disease caused by repeated h
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 832 F.3d 389; 2016 WL 4191891
PRECEDENTIAL AMENDED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568, and 14-4569 _____________ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGU
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-08-25 · Published · cited 1× · 799 F.3d 259; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14955; 2015 WL 5010799
OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: The issue presented in this appeal is whether SB 2460, which the New Jersey Legislature enacted in 2014 (the “2014 Law”) to partially repeal certain prohibitions on sports gambling, violates federal law. 2014 N.J. Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 62, codified at N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 5:12A-7 to - 9. The District Court held that the 2014 Law violates the Professional and Amateur Sports Protect
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013-09-17 · Published · cited 61× · 730 F.3d 208; 2013 WL 5184139
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Betting on sports is an activity that has unarguably increased in popularity over the last several decades. Seeking to address instances of illegal sports wagering within its borders and to improve its economy, the State of New Jersey has sought to license gambling on certain professional and amateur sporting events. A conglomerate of sports leagues, displeased
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-07-30 · Published · cited 28× · 302 F.R.D. 69; 2014 WL 3765729
OPINION AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded Floyd and Ligón to the District Court to resolve pending motions to intervene in these actions and to “effectuate a settlement” between “such concerned or interested parties as the District Court deems appropriate.” Floyd, ECF No. 426; Ligon, ECF
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 59× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 502
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: *513TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND A. History and Purposes of the Census...519 B. The Secretary's Authority Over the Census...521 C. The History of a Citizenship Question on the Census...524 D. Test
California Court of Appeal · 2023-11-29 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 11/29/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO RENEE THOMAS, Plaintiff and Appellant, A164550 v. THE REGENTS OF THE (Alameda County UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et Super. Ct. No. RG20073375) al., Defendants and Responden
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-04-09 · Published · cited 9× · 98 F.4th 288
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2023 Decided April 9, 2024 No. 22-1081 STATE OF OHIO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ADVANCED ENERGY UN
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025-02-18 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2332 ___________________________ State of Missouri; State of Arkansas; State of Florida; State of Georgia; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State of Oklahoma Plaintiffs - Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-10-05 · Published · cited 35× · 50 F.4th 498
Case: 21-40680 Document: 00516498357 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2022 N
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-01-09 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 19-10011 Document: 00515265674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2020 REVISED January 9, 2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2019
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
REVISED December 20, 2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2019 No. 19-10011 Lyle W. Cayce
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-12-18 · Published · cited 15× · 945 F.3d 355
Case: 19-10011 Document: 00515242592 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2019 No. 19-10011
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-06-06 · Published · cited 2× · 309 F. Supp. 3d 289
Baylson, J. *294"no place indeed should murder sanctuarize." Hamlet, Act 4, sc 7, II, 98 "nor sleep nor sanctuary." Coriolanus, Act 1, sc II, 19-27 "The privilege of sanctuary was as ancient as England itself and developed from a mixture of Hebrew, Greek, Roman, Anglo-Saxon, an
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 277× · 809 F.3d 134; 2015 WL 6873190
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The United States1 appeals a preliminary injunction, pending trial, forbidding implementation of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans -and Lawful Permanent Residents program (“DAPA”). Twenty-six states (the “states”2) challenged DAPA under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution;