Cases

OPINION James M. Dowd, Judge Jessie Gray filed a products liability lawsuit against 3M Company alleging that the 3M 8710 respirators he wore while employed by National Compression Services as a concrete sandblasting and demolition supervisor were defective and resulted in Gray suffering from the lung disease silicosis. The case was tried by a jury and a verdic

764 N.W.2d 631 (2009) Clifford L. WHITAKER, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents, v. 3M COMPANY, Appellant. No. A08-0816. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 28, 2009. *633 Susan M. Coler, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis and Michael D. Lieder, Washington, DC, for respondents.

DECISION The Defendant, Homasote Company ("Homasote"), moves for summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 56. Homasote asserts that no issue of material fact exists, and such motion should be granted. The Plaintiff, Joseph LaPointe ("Mr. LaPointe"), objects to the motion. Facts and Travel Mr. LaPointe filed a complaint in this Court on May

DECISION The Defendant, Heatbath Corporation (Heatbath) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 56. The Plaintiffs, Joseph LaPointe (Mr. LaPointe), and his wife, Yvette LaPointe (collectively, the Plaintiffs), object to the motion. I Facts and Travel The Plainti

DECISION The Defendant, John Deere Company ("John Deere"), moves for summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 56. The Plaintiffs, Marilyn Downs ("Ms. Downs") and her minor child, Erin Downs (collectively "Plaintiffs"), object to the motion. Facts and Travel Ms. Downs filed a complaint in this Court on March 24, 2006, alleging, inter alia, t

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-IA-00617-SCT 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. v. LETHA C. GLASS, ET AL. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/17/2003 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: W. WAYNE DRINKWATER, JR. MARGARET OERTLING CUPPLES

917 So.2d 90 (2005) 3M COMPANY f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, et al. v. Letha C. GLASS, et al. 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, et al. v. Charles H. Green, et al. Nos. 2003-IA-00617-SCT, 2003-IA-00476-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 15, 2005. *91 W. Wayne Drin

17 F.3d 1453 38 ERC 1259, 305 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 62USLW 2549,24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,544 3M COMPANY (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING), Petitioner,v.Carol M. BROWNER, Administrator of Environmental ProtectionAgency and Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. No. 92-1126. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit.

513 F.Supp.2d 322 (2007) BRADBURN PARENT TEACHER STORE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. 3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY). Civil Action No. 02-7676. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 14, 2007. *323 *324 Charles M. Jones, Jones Ost

HORTON, J. The defendant, 3M National Advertising Company, Inc., appeals an eminent domain decision by the Superior Court (Conboy, J.), reducing the awards of the board of tax and land appeals (BTLA). The defendant argues that the trial court failed to award just compensation *362by: (1) not employing one of three generally recognized methods of appraisal valuati

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge: This petition for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s assessment of civil penalties turns on the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2462, the direct descendant of a statute of limitations enacted more than a century and a half ago. There, are three questions. Does § 2462 apply to administrative proceedings? If so, is a proc

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BURCIAGA, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center [Sloan-Kettering] and Dr. Basil Hilaris [Hilaris] to dismiss and quash service of process for lack of personal jurisdiction and the motion of Defendant 3M Company to dismiss Plaintiff Dan Swallows’ Complaint in Joinder. Defendants Sloan-Kettering and

20 F.3d 750 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2974, 127 Lab.Cas. P 11,062 COLFAX ENVELOPE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.LOCAL NO. 458-3M, CHICAGO GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONSINTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-3010. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Feb. 14, 1994.Decided April 1, 1994.

463 F.3d 360 HALLIBURTON COMPANY BENEFITS COMMITTEE, In Its Capacity as Plan Administrator of the Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, including its constituent benefit program, the Dresser Retiree Life and Medical Program; Halliburton Co.; Halliburton Energy Services Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.James GRAVES; Phil Griffin; Paul M. Bryant, individually and as representatives of a requested

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2005-CA-00372-SCT SUSAN R. MOSS, TRACY M. NICHOLS, KENNY R. MOSS AND RORY A. GARCIA v. BATESVILLE CASKET COMPANY, INC. AND OTT & LEE FUNERAL HOME DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/28/2004 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. V. R. COTTEN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: T. JACKSON LYONS

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge Plaintiffs, the estates and family members of two former employees of defendant Weyerhaeuser Company, assert negligence claims against Weyerhaeuser based on non-occupational community and household exposure to asbestos fibers emitted from a Weyerhaeuser manufacturing facility. These two cases are the second wave of asbestos-related claims asserted against Weyerhaeuser in this court. Pending among o

CABRET, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 3, 2006) THIS MATTER is before the Court on fourteen Motions to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Third-Party/Cross-Claim Defendants1 [hereinafter “TPDs”] concerning the common law contribu*378tion and indemnification counts of the Third

131 Nev., Advance Opinion 614 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA EUREKA COUNTY, A POLITICAL No. 61324 SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA; KENNETH F. BENSON, INDIVIDUALLY; DIAMOND CATTLE COMPANY, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED FLED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND MICHEL AND

675 F.Supp. 877 (1987) Dr. Jerre M. FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant. Dr. Jerre M. FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. COOPERVISION, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 84-577 CMW, 85-46 CMW. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 17, 1987. *878 *879<

*263OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. This case arises from an antitrust action brought by ZF Meritor, LLC (“ZF Meritor”) and Meritor Transmission Corporation (“Meritor”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”) for allegedly anticompetitive practices in the heavy-duty truck transmissions market. The practices at issu