Cases

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Wiley T. Nichols, Jr., a prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment denying his motion for correction of sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because We find Nichols’s motion time-barred, we affirm. Background On January

37 F.3d 1484NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases. James Wiley NICHOLS, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee. No. 94-1179 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Oct. 17, 1994 Appeal from the United Sta

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert L. Nichols, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Uiddelines Manual. We affirm. The district court properly co

923 F.2d 840 Nichols (James Wiley)v.U.S. NO. 90-1678 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. DEC 21, 1990 1 Appeal From: D.P.R. 2 AFFIRMED.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, District Judge. Pending is Defendant Asplundh Tree Expert Co.’s motion for dismissal of Count Four of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint [ECF 15]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND This putative collective action centers on allegations that Defendant Asplundh Tree

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Roger Nichols, an individual, and Three Eagles Music, said to be a division of Roger Nichols Music, Inc., sued Club for Growth Action, alleging that the Club's advertisement violated copyrights held by Three Eagles Music and Mr. Nichols' personal rights under trademark law. The Court granted in part and denied in part Club for Growth Action's Motion to Dismiss and dismissed Mr. Nicho

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Club for Growth Action is a political organization that broadcast a 30-second political advertisement on Wisconsin television and the Internet in September 2015. The advertisement challenged the record of former-Senator Russ* Feingold, who was then running for re-election against Ron Johnson. Roge

843 F.2d 1385 U.S.v.Nichols (James Wiley) NO. 87-1912 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. MAR 28, 1988 1 Appeal From: D.P.R. 2 AFFIRMED.

126 F.Supp.2d 479 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wiley T. NICHOLS, Jr., Defendant. No. 1:92-CR-01. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 15, 2000. *480 Donald Daniels, U.S. Attorney's Office, Grand Rapids, MI, for U.S. Wiley T. Nichols, Leavenworth, KS, Pro se.

PREWITT, Judge. Plaintiffs have an interest in real property situated to the north of land owned by Defendant. Plaintiffs filed a petition alleging that Defendant “erected or caused to be erected a dam across” a drainage ditch which drained water from land farmed by Plaintiffs and on which they resided. Plaintiffs sought an injunction directing Defendant to remove the dam and directing Defendant to restore the drainage ditch s

790 N.E.2d 1056 (2003) SERVICEMASTER DIVERSIFIED HEALTH SERVICES, L.P., Appellant-Defendant, v. Henry WILEY, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 46A04-0210-CV-485. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 2, 2003. *1057 Christopher A. Nichols, Husch & Eppenberger, LLC, Peoria, IL, Attorney for Appellant. Shaw Friedman, Friedman and Assoc

PREWITT, Presiding Judge. This action commenced as a dispute over the boundary line separating Plaintiffs property from that of Defendants’-Appellants’. Appellants then brought in and sought relief from Third-Party Defendants. Thereafter, the parties agreed upon a settlement of the dispute. Appellants refused to carry through with the agreement, contending that it had not been completed in accordance with

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from defendant-appellant James Wiley Nichols’ conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, Nichols raises four issues: whether the district court erred in accepting his guilty plea, whether this sentence was improperly enhanced, whether

233 Ga. 824 (1975) 213 S.E.2d 682 WILEY et al. v. WILEY. 29475. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued January 17, 1975. Decided February 25, 1975. *828 Bryan & Wilgus, Edward H. Johnson, Gray & Nelson, Donald O. Nelson, for appellants. Richard L. Powell, for appelle

ACCEPTED 03-14-00563-CR 4564597 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/19/2015 1:4

GENOVESE, Judge. 111n this personal injury action, Defendants, Fred and Nicole Taylor, appeal the trial court’s judgment finding them liable and awarding damages for the injuries sustained by Plaintiff, Dempsey Ray Wiley, as a result of a barroom scuffle. For the following reasons, we reverse. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The record indicates that on October 14, 2007, Dempsey Wile

Cite as 2023 Ark. 97 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-21-417 Opinion Delivered: June 8, 2023 REBECCA NICHOLS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 60CV-21-132

Cite as 2023 Ark. 97 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-21-417 Opinion Delivered: June 8, 2023 REBECCA NICHOLS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 60CV-21-132

233 Ga. 316 (1974) 210 S.E.2d 790 THE STATE v. WILEY. 28977. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued November 12, 1974. Decided November 18, 1974. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1974. Fred M. Hasty, District Attorney, Walker P. Johnson, Assistant District Attorney, W. Louis Sands, for appellant. Frank

955 So.2d 962 (2007) Johnny P. NICHOLS, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2006-CA-00111-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. May 1, 2007. *964 William C. Stennett, attorney for appellant. Office of The Attorney General by W. Glenn Watts, attorney for appellee. Before KING, C.J., IRVING and ROBERTS, J