Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 19-3693 _______________ CARE ONE MANAGEMENT LLC, ET AL. Appellants v. UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, ET AL. ________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 19-3693 _______________ CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL., Appellants v. UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, ET AL. ________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiffs Schwartzco Enterprises, LLC (“Schwartzco”), a New York limited liability company; the Meat House — Roslyn LLC (“TMH Roslyn”), a New York limited liability company; and Arnold M. Schwartz, an individual resident of New *338York (collectively the “Plaintiffs”

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1038-12T2 A-1445-12T2 A-1636-12T2 A-1792-12T2 NEW JERSEY HEALTHCARE COALI

LOHIER, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to consider the power of the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board” or the “NLRB”) to authorize petitions for temporary injunctive relief under Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(j), and the propriety of the District Court’s decision to grant an injunction in this case. HealthBridge Management (“H

276 F.Supp.2d 255 (2003) HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROYAL HEALTHCARE OF MIDDLE-SEX, LLC; and Middlesex County Improvement Authority, Defendants. Middlesex County Improvement Authority, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Surbhi Tarkas; Amjad Chowdry; and Greenwich Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 01-3223 (WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jers

LEVAL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff and Defendant 1 each appeal from the judgment of the United States *32 District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, /.), which, following a bench

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: On October 26, 2012, Guthrie Healthcare System (“Guthrie”) filed this trademark infringement action against ContextMedia, Inc. (“CMI”), and its president and chief executive officer (“CEO”), Rishi Shah. (Complaint, ECF No. 1; Trial Decl. of Rishi U. Shah (“Shah Deck”) ¶ 1, ECF No. 105.) Guthrie amended its complaint one year later to alleg

COOPER, District Judge PRELIMINARY STATEMENT I. Findings of Fact .... 447 A. Medical treatment for emesis .... 447 B. The patents-in-suit .... 449 C. Factual chronology .... 450 1. Syntex and the genus '333 patent .... 450 2. Roche Syntex further develo

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiffs Jamie Martin and Daneisha Singleton bring this action on behalf of themselves and similarly situated persons, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et. seq. (“FLSA”), and the New York Labor Law, N.Y. Lab. Law § 650, et. seq. (“NYLL”). Plaintiffs served as field agents securin

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT1 [151] DANIEL T.K. HURLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint [ECF 151] on ground that all state law fraud-based claims are preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), and alternatively, on ground that the plaintif

823 F.Supp.2d 166 (2011) Marc PENBERG, Plaintiff, v. HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, Defendant. No. 08 CV 1534 (CLP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 17, 2011. *170 Arthur Z. Schwartz, Schwartz, Lichten & Bright, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Caroline Jacobsen Berdzik, Kelly L. Bannister, Sandra S. M

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 29, 2017 (Doc. 19)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 4, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whe

782 F.Supp.2d 294 (2011) NORTH CYPRESS MEDICAL CENTER OPERATING CO. et al, Plaintiffs, v. CIGNA HEALTHCARE et al, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09-cv-2556. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 2, 2011. *297 J. Douglas Sutter, Kelly Sutter et al, Houston, TX, Neil L. Prupis, Lampf Lipkind et al., West

*431OPINION GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. Appellant Quad/Graphics Inc. appeals from the judgment of the District Court affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s confirmation of 0ne20ne Communications, LLC’s (the “Debtor”) Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and dismissing Appellant’s bankruptcy appeal as equitably moot. Appellant contends that the District Cour

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: - John Gorman brings claims for discrimination and retaliation1 under both the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws, as well as a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, naming as Defendants his former employer, Covidien Sales, LLC (“Covidien”), and his former supervisor, Dale Kelly. Defenda

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Beach TV Cable Co., Inc. d/b/a Key TV (“Key TV”), a local over-the-air broadcaster serving the Florida Keys, brought this action in federal district court against Comcast of Florida/Georgia, LLC (“Comcast”), which owns and operates a cable television system serving the same area. Pursuant to federal law, Key TV is entitled to lease access on a Com-cast channel at a reasonable rate and free

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge This appeal presents a question of fed-eral preemption law. In November 2008, DVI Funding, LLC and several entities known as DVI Receivables filed involun-tary bankruptcy petitions against Maury Rosenberg and his affiliated businesses.-After the Bankruptcy Court dismissed the involuntary petitions, Rosenberg recov-e

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) GMF ELCM FUND L.P., GMF ELCM ) LLC, GMF ELCM REGENCY I LLC, ) and GMF ELCM REGENCY II LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0840-SG ) ELCM HCRE GP LLC, ELCM ) SPONSOR I HOLDCO LLC, EL

MEMORANDUM OPINION TUCKER, Chief Judge. Presently before this Court is Defendants Saber Healthcare Group, Saber Healthcare Holdings, LLC, Bryn Mawr Healthcare Group, LLC (collectively, “Saber”), and BHG Aviv LLC’s (“Aviv”)1 Motion for Summary Judgment in their favor on all claims' asserted by Plaintiff Tender Touch Rehab Services, LLC (“Plaintiff’). In its Complaint