Cases

Case: 23-1653 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 03/03/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DOE NO. 1, Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2023-1653 ______________________ Appeal from the United

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1747C (Filed: January 9, 2023) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** DOE NO. 1, * * Plaintiff, * * v. *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1747C (Filed Under Seal: July 26, 2022) (Reissued: August 9, 2022) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** DOE NO. 1, * * Plaintiff, * * v.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1878 Filed: May 6, 2020 Reissued: May 22, 20201 ) DOE NO. 1, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Fair Labor Standards Act; Conditional

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1749C (Filed: April 6, 2020) ) DOE NO.1, DOE NO. 2, ) Keywords: Conditional Certification; ) Proposed Notice; Class Action; FLSA; Plaintiffs, ) Overtime Pay; Federal Bureau of

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1749C (Filed: February 5, 2020) ) DOE NO. 1, et al., ) Keywords: Protective Order; Anonymity; ) FLSA; Overtime Pay; Federal Bureau of Plaintiffs, ) Investigation; English Moni

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-152C Filed: May 20, 2019 ) DOE NO. 1, et al, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Conditional Certification Of Collective v.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1019C (Filed Under Seal: May 20, 2021) (Reissued: June 4, 2021)* FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** PLAINTIFF NO. 1, * * Plaintiff, * * v.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-94C (E-Filed: March 4, 2021) 1 ) PLAINTIFF NO. 1, et al., ) ) Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Plaintiffs, ) Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 ) U.S.C. §§

Section 515; Breach of contract; Taking; Statute of limitations; Claim accrual. OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This is an action for breach of contract, or, in the alternative, for a Fifth Amendment taking arising from the government’s repudiation of loan agreements made under sections 515 and 521 of the Housing Act of 1949. Pending before

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-393C (Filed: October 4, 2018) ) PLAINTIFF NO. 1, et al., ) Keywords: Conditional Certification of ) Collective Action; FLSA; Common Issues Plaintiffs, ) of Law and Fact

KENNETH A. MARRA, United States District Judge This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414).

MEMORANDUM * Petitioners ask us to review BPA’s decision to implement a provision of the 2001 Load Reduction Agreement BPA entered into with PacifiCorp and Puget Sound Energy (“PSE”). The controversy concerns a “Reduction of Risk Discount” provision, which Petitioners term a “litigation penalty.” The details of the provision are discussed in our opinion, Public Util. Dist.

Affirmed by unpublished opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge DIAZ joined. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. . WYNN, Circuit Judge: In this white-collar criminal matter, a federal grand jury has been investigating whether commodities traders engaged in misconduct. At the heart of this appeal is whether evidence that the gra

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Affirmed in part and vacated in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: *253Appellants1 challenge the district court’s order granting the government’s Motion to Compel Documents and Testimony Pursuant to Grand Jury Subpoena (t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 15-273 (CKK) UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 11, 2019) Plaintiff

Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Mehrab # 1 Corp. seeks judicial review under 7 U.S.C. § 2023(a)(13) of a United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) decision disqualifying it for six months from participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“SNAP”), formerly known as the Food Stamp Program. By agreement of the parties, the court stay

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiffs in this lawsuit are foreign individuals seeking conditional permanent residence in the United States via the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. Plaintiffs challenge the decision of United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (“US-CIS”) to deny th

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.