Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Nancy Alejos”
Alejo Jimenez v. Heyligerpublic domain
792 F.Supp. 910 (1992) Nancy ALEJO JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Eduardo HEYLIGER, Seguros Triple S, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 88-2028 GG. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 14, 1992. *911 *912 Raul Davila Rivera, Bauza & Davila, Old San Juan, P.R., for plaintiff.
United States v. Jose Morales-Alejopublic domain
FOGEL, District Judge: This case presents the issue of whether pretrial detention operates to toll a term of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e), which provides for tolling “during any period in which the person is imprisoned in connection with a conviction ... unless the imprisonment is for a period of less than 30 consecutive days.” Appellant Jose Morales-Alejo (“Mo
Windhaven Ins. Co. v. Biscayne Rehab Center, Inc.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 11, 2018. ________________ Nos. 3D18-0250 Lower Tribunal Nos. 16-404, 16-405, 16-406, 16-407, 16-408, 16-466, 16-467, 16-468, 16-469, 16-470, 16-473, 16-474, 16-475, 16-476, 16-477, 16-478, 16-479, & 16-491 ________________
Ridge v. Berryhillpublic domain
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Mark Ridge ("plaintiff") commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act on February 3, 2017, challenging the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner" or the "government") denying plaintiff's applicati
United States v. Naranjopublic domain
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: For deciding the sole issue presented— the district court’s jurisdiction vel non to revoke Sammy Naranjo’s supervised release subsequent to the expiration of that term — we must decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i) (under certain conditions, supervised release may be revoked subsequent to completion of supervised-release-term) permits post-term revocation if it is based
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinionpublic domain
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT November 12,2003 The Honorable Jose R. Rodriguez Opinion No. GA-O 119 El Paso County Attorney 500 East San Antonio, Room 503 Re: Whether a school district that does not El Paso, Texas 79901 participate in the state uniform group coverage
People v. Adamspublic domain
JUSTICE WOLFSON delivered the opinion of the court: Following a bench trial, the defendant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, usually considered a Class 3 felony. Because the victim was the defendant’s son, the offense was elevated to a Class 2 felony. 720 ILCS 5/9 — 3(f) (West 2000). Defendant was sentenced to 12 years in pri
People v. Adamspublic domain
842 N.E.2d 1187 (2006) 363 Ill. App.3d 34 299 Ill.Dec. 835 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanton ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-04-2680. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. January 24, 2006. *1188 Michael J. Pelletier, Deput
Tripp v. Statepublic domain
610 So.2d 1311 (1992) Vinney TRIPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 91-1540. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 22, 1992. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
People v. Barrypublic domain
152 Ill. App.3d 915 (1987) 504 N.E.2d 1381 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES BARRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 3-86-0378. Illinois Appellate Court Third District. Opinion filed March 10, 1987. *916 Nancy Rink Carter, of State Appellate Defender's Office, of Ottawa, for appel
Arline v. Statepublic domain
550 So.2d 1180 (1989) Michael Jerome ARLINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 88-2767. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 25, 1989. *1181 Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Nancy L. Showalter, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., an
Matrisciano v. Randlepublic domain
569 F.3d 723 (2009) Ronald MATRISCIANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P. RANDLE, Director of the Department of Corrections of the State of Illinois, and Donald Snyder, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-1599. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 6, 2006. Decided June 26, 2009. *726 Howard
People v. Briskerpublic domain
169 Ill. App.3d 1007 (1988) 523 N.E.2d 1191 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM BRISKER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-2181. Illinois Appellate Court First District (1st Division). Opinion filed May 9, 1988. *1008 Randolph W. Stone, Public Defender, of Chicago (Andrea Monsee
Ronald Matrisciano v. Randle, Micheal P.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 06-1599 R ONALD M ATRISCIANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M ICHAEL P. R ANDLE, Director of the Department of Corrections of the State of Illinois, and D ONALD S NYDER, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the C
People v. Christypublic domain
JUSTICE MILLER, dissenting: In my view, the case at bar is indistinguishable from People v. Wade (1989), 131 Ill. 2d 370, and the principles expressed in that opinion are clearly applicable here. Consistent with Wade, I would hold that the defendant’s conviction and sentence for the Class X felony of armed violence, bas
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Kerr v. Polispublic domain
FILED Appellate Case: 17-1192 Document: 010110617974 United Date Filed: States CourtPage: 12/13/2021 of Appeals 1 Tenth Circuit
People v. Nicolauspublic domain
54 Cal.3d 551 (1991) 817 P.2d 893 286 Cal. Rptr. 628 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT HENRY NICOLAUS, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S004766. Crim. No. 26406. Supreme Court of California. October 24, 1991. *560 COUNSEL Fern M. Laethem, State Public Defende
People v. Mora & Rangelpublic domain
CUÉLLAR, J. *450 This automatic appeal arises from defendants Joseph Adam Mora and Ruben Rangel's 1999 convictions and death sentences for the *451 attempted robberies and murders of Andres E
in Re Vcc, LLC, Vratsinas Construction Co., Nato Garcia D/B/A Nato Garcia Company, and Phi Service Agency, Inc.public domain
FILED 17-0818 12/22/2017 11:17 AM tex-21458098 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHOR