Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED NOVEMBER 1998 SESSION February 9, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appe llate Court C lerk COY D. WILLIAMS, )

995 A.2d 763 (2010) 192 Md. App. 469 Marshall ADAMS v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1204 Sept.Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 26, 2010. *764 Amy E. Brennan (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for Appellant. Jeremy M. McCoy (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.

866 A.2d 885 (2005) 160 Md. App. 672 Maurice Andre PARKER v. STATE of Maryland. No. 2119, September Term, 2003. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. January 27, 2005. *886 Allison E. Pierce (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. Mary Ann Ince (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen

977 S.W.2d 52 (1998) Nancy J. NOLTE and Judith E. Kassing, Appellants, v. Katherine L. WITTMAIER, et al., Respondent. No. 72416. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. July 28, 1998. Rehearing Denied September 30, 1998. *53 Thomas M. Blumenthal, Andrew T. Pickens IV, Paule, Camazine & Blum

PER CURIAM: Gary Lee Smith was charged and convicted on 40 counts of sexual abuse and exploitation of his children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 13 and 2032. Smith appeals his conviction on the grounds that it was obtained in violation of his double jeopardy rights. We review double jeopardy challenges de novo. United States v. Castiglione, 876 F.2d 73, 75 (9t

483 F.Supp. 930 (1979) Kenneth BAKER, Arthur Bartniczak, Hanson Bratton, Patrick Jordan, Frank Krzesowik, Elbert McVay and Robert Scally, Plaintiffs in Civ. No. 5-71937, and Hanson Bratton, Gale Bogenn, William Shell, Patrick Jordan, Charles Mahoney, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and the Detroit Police Lieutenants & Sergeants Association, Plaintiffs in Civ. No. 5-72264, v. CITY OF DETROIT, a Municipal Cor

Philips, J. This is a bill in equity to have respondents declared trustees to the use of complainants of certain lands situated in Hickory county, this state. The controversy grows out of about the following state of facts: The land formerly belonged to one P. V. Thomas, who sold the same to one Emily Hays of Indiana. Mrs. Hays conveyed to •one Susannah Stewart, taking her note for the purchase money, and a deed of mortgage on t

518 U.S. 515 (1996) UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA et al. No. 94-1941. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 17, 1996. Decided June 26, 1996.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT *517 *517 *518