Cases

MARTIN, Circuit Judge: Naomie Maitre appeals her conviction and sentence after a jury found her guilty of charges related to access device fraud and identity theft. After careful consideration, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the District Court in all respects. I. BACKGROUND A superseding indictment charge

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Cornelius, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Cornelius, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

1 2024 CO 68 In Re Mercy Housing Management Group Inc., Plaintiff v. Naomi Bermudez. Defendant No. 24SA163Supreme Court of Colorado, En BancOctober 21, 2024 Original Proceeding Pursuant to C.A.R. 21 County Court, City and County of Denver, Case No. 24C58400 Honorable Isaam Shamsid-Deen, J

Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. *673 In this case, we again consider whether the public's right to information under the Texas Public Information Act (PIA) is subject to reasonable limitations when its production may lead to physical harm. See Tex.

34 Cal.Rptr.3d 236 (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 808 In re NAOMI P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. J.B. et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B179756. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four. September 13, 2005.

685 F.Supp. 842 (1988) William F. THOMPSON, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. N. Lois ADAMS, a/k/a Naomi Lois Adams, f/k/a Lois A. Evans; Boyd D. Evans; United States of America; Oscar E. Kramer, Jr.; Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson; the Springs Community Association, Inc.; Robert L. Poore, Esquire; Rinker Materials Corporation; and Michael Sigman, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 86-601-CIV-ORL-18. United States Dist

254 P.3d 515 (2011) 292 Kan. 151 STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Asa ADAMS, Appellant. No. 101,236. Supreme Court of Kansas. April 29, 2011. *517 Janine Cox, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Boyd K. Isherwood, assistant district attorney, argued

ACCEPTED 03-15-00044-CV 5603446 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

JACOB P. HART, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Sheri Sprouse brought this action under 42 USC § 405(g) to obtain review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"). She has filed a Request for Review to which the Commissioner has responded. Both p

ACCEPTED 03-15-00044-CV 6433766 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

992 A.2d 697 (2010) In re ADAM R. No. 2008-900. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: September 23, 2009. Opinion Issued: March 10, 2010. *699 Smith-Weiss, Shepard & Durmer, P.C., of Nashua (Robert M. Shepard on the brief and orally), for the respondent. Law Offices of Randall E. Wilbert, PLLC, of Nashua (Lu

*1256Opinion VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J. Naomi L. appeals from a dispositional order denying her reunification services in her five-year-old daughter S.G.’s juvenile dependency. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 361.5, subd. (b)(6).)1 Appellant, who previously submitted the matter on evidence that she and her boyfriend caused the chi

314 F.Supp. 399 (1970) Naomi ADAMS v. John W. MACY, Jr., Chairman, Robert E. Hampton, and Ludwig J. Andolsek, Commissioners being and comprizing the members of the United States Civil Service Commission. Civ. A. No. 19506. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 23, 1970. M. Richard Moss, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. George Beall, U. S. Atty., and C

399 B.R. 124 (2008) In re NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, Appellant, v. Diana G. Adams, United States Trustee; Carval Investors, LLC; and Association of Flight Attendants—CWA, AFL-CIO, Appellees. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Northwest Airlines Corporation, Appellant, v. Diana G. Adams, United States Trustee; Carval Investors, LLC; and Association of Flight Attendants—CW

421 B.R. 164 (2009) In re IMAGE MASTERS, INC., et al., Debtors. Lynn E. Feldman, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Image Masters, Inc., et al., Plaintiff, v. Chase Home Finance, Citimortgage, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Fifth Third Bank, GMAC Mortgage Corp., Provident Funding Associates, L.P., Saxon Mortgage, Inc., Sovereign Bancorp, Inc., SunTrust Bank, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Defendants.

ORDER ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp”), and Alan B. Levan’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents Regarding the SEC’s Investigation and Enforcement Actions Against Financial Institutions that Received Federal Assistance [D.E. 29] and Defendants Bancorp and Levan’s Motion to

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

761 N.E.2d 782 (2001) 326 Ill. App.3d 372 260 Ill.Dec. 599 ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The VILLAGE OF HINSDALE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-00-1393. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. December 12, 2001. *785 Rooks, Pitts & Poust, Bruce L. Gold

MEMORANDUM & ORDER VITALIANO, District Judge. Between 1986 and 1996, plaintiffs, ten individuals who were at the time special needs children, were placed in foster care with, and were subsequently adopted by, Judith Leekin, who abused, neglected, imprisoned, and denied them any education or medical care. Plaintiffs bring this action against the City of New York (the “City”) and the private foster care

SUMMARY ORDER Luisa C. Esposito, pro se, appeals from the district court’s May 12, 2016 order, denying as untimely her third motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 to reopen her 2008 case (the “Rule 60 motion”) in which she asserted 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims based on allegations that her former attorney, Allen H. Isaac, sexually assaulted and harassed her and that others conspired to protect him fro