Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Natalie A. Mitchell”
Natalie A. Vowell v. Jason Kander, In His Official Capacity As Missouri Secretary Of Statepublic domain
*270 JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge. Natalie A. Vowell appeals from the Circuit Court of Cole County’s dismissal of her Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive relief filed against Jason Kan-der, in his official capacity as Missouri Secretary of State. On March 11, 201⅜ Appellant
Mitchell v. Villienpublic domain
19 So.3d 557 (2009) Christopher MITCHELL v. Dr. Paul O. VILLIEN, Jr., The City of New Orleans and Detective John Hunter in his Official Capacity as a New Orleans Police Officer. No. 2008-C-1470. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. August 26, 2009. *559 Gary W. Bizal, Pierce & Bizal, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Chris
Tony Ray Mitchell v. Natalie Nicole Mitchellpublic domain
Opinion filed May 27, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-10-00188-CV __________ TONY RAY MITCHELL V. NATALIE NICOLE MITCHELL On Appeal from the 18th District Court
Tony Ray Mitchell v. Natalie Nicole Mitchellpublic domain
Opinion filed May 27, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals
Natalie Radko v. Shahar Levipublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT NATALIE RADKO, Appellant, v. SHAHAR LEVI, Appellee. Nos. 4D2024-0162 & 4D2024-0242 [September 4, 2024] Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Cir
Davis v. Mitchellpublic domain
HOLLAND, Justice: This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Family Court. The respondent-appellant, Stephen A. Davis (“Davis”), and the petitioner-appellee, Tammy L. Mitchell (“Mitchell”), are the parents of a minor child. The origin of this proceeding relates to child support. The Family Court judgment dismissed Davis’ request for review de novo by a Judge because Davis had failed to appear at a hearing before
Natalie Crosby v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued June 21, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00664-CR NO. 01-17-00665-CR NO. 01-17-00676-CR ——————————— NATALIE CROSBY, Appellant
Matter of Kamryn R. (Natalie R.)public domain
Matter of Kamryn R. (Natalie R.) (2020 NY Slip Op 06129) Matter of Kamryn R. (Natalie R.) 2020 NY Slip Op 06129 Decided on October 28, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Mitchell v. Ahmedpublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-1896 _____________________________ NATALIE MITCHELL, Appellant, v. SEBASTIAN AHMED, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Joshua M. Hawkes, Judge. December 13, 2023 PER CURIAM. In this appeal, the mother,
Mitchell v. Monongahela Power Co.public domain
602 F.Supp. 756 (1985) Natalie MITCHELL, Administratrix and personal representative of the Estate of Lanny D. Mitchell, Plaintiff, v. MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 83-A126. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division. February 14, 1985. *757 R. Vance Golden, III, Robert K. Tebay, III
Natalie Hagan v. Michael Phippspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 13, 2010 Session NATALIE HAGAN v. MICHAEL PHIPPS ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 2008-CV-695 Clara W. Byrd, Judge No. M2010-00002-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 28, 2010 This appeal involves claims by a home purchaser against a licensed contractor and a busin
Bank of America, N.A. v. Cd-04, Inc. (In re Owner Management Service, LLC Trustee Corps)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Maureen A. Tighe, United States Bankruptcy Judge On January 9, 2012, debtor Owner Management Service, LLC; Trust Holding Service Co; Bill Pay Service and Boston Holding (collectively, the “Debtor”) filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition. This adversary proceeding (the “Substantive Consolidation Complaint”) is related to the Debt- or’s pending chapter 7
State v. McElroypublic domain
James Edward Welsh, Judge Jerome McElroy appeals the trial court’s judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of first-degree robbery (§ 569.020, RSMo1) and armed criminal action (§ 571.015). We affirm. Background The evidence at McElroy’s trial2 showed that two men entered a Little Cae
State v. Mitchellpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,721 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DAWSON JAMES MITCHELL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A district court's decisio
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT NATALIE R. DELLINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-1499 SECRETARY OF LABOR; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Amici Supporting Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court f
Boyce v. Statepublic domain
Order Per Curiam: Demetrius L. Boyce appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Boyce argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to seek suppression of the victim’s pre-trial and in-court identifications of Boyce as the person who committed the crimes. Finding no error of law, we a
State v. Demarspublic domain
Order Per Curiam: Frank Demars appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of six counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, one count of first-degree child molestation, and one count of sexual misconduct with a child, for which he was sentenced to a total of forty-nine years’ imprisonment. Demars argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of one of the six counts of first-degree
Richard Smego v. Jacqueline Mitchellpublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff Richard Smego, a civil detainee at the Rush-ville Treatment and Detention Center in Illinois, sued a dentist, two doctors, and a dental hygienist for violating his constitutional rights by acting with deliberate indifference to his serious dental problems. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We
323 S.W.3d 830 (2010) Nathan REEDER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MARSHALL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent. No. WD 71930. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 2, 2010. R. Mark Nasteff, Jr., Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Thomas A. Mickes, Natalie A. Hoernschemeyer, and Elizabeth A. Helfrich, St. Louis, MO, Attorneys for Responden
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KA-01052-COA SHANNON HINTON A/K/A SHANNON APPELLANT ROCHELE HINTON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/03/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JON MARK WEATHERS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST