Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Natalie Marie Harris”
Natalie Marie Keepers v. Commonwealth of Virginiapublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Humphreys and O’Brien Argued at Lexington, Virginia PUBLISHED NATALIE MARIE KEEPERS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0279-19-3 JUDGE MARY GRACE O’BRIEN
Harris v. Board of Educationpublic domain
JUDGMENT, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: I. Introduction... 94 II. Facts... 95 A. Initial Proceedings... 95 B. Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment.. .96 III. Law... 97
Maranda ODonnell v. Harris County, Texas, epublic domain
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: *534 Maranda ODonnell and other plaintiffs (collectively, "ODonnell") brought a class action suit against Harris County, Texas, and a number of its officials-including County Judges, 1 Hearing O
Natalie Janine Garnes M.D. v. Alma McAfeepublic domain
Opinion issued December 23, 2021. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00717-CV ——————————— NATALIE JANINE GARNES M.D., Appellant V. ALMA MCAFEE, Appe
RICKESHIA-RAQUEL * NO. 2022-CA-0774 DEVALL * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * HOME FINDERS FOURTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND * NATALIE W. GAMBLE STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: C
Odonnell v. Harris Cnty.public domain
Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge Fourteen Harris County Criminal Court at Law Judges-Paula Goodhart, Bill Harmon *648, Natalie C. Fleming, John Clinton, Margaret Harris, Larry Standley, Pam Derbyshire, Jay Karahan, Analia Wilkerson, Dan Spjut, Diane Bull, Robin Brown, Don Smyth, and Jean Hughes (Jean Spradling)-are appealing
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 17, 2014 Session PATRICK RICHARD MOORCROFT v. FLORA TEMPLETON STUART v. NATALIE TALMAGE MOORCROFT Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 2102CV1066 C. L. Rogers, Judge
Murphree v. Commissionerpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Murphree, who is white, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Social Security Administration (the “Agency”) in his employment-discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. Murphree is long-term employee with the Agency who, at the time of the events giving rise to this case, was a District Man
In re Paternity of D.A. and A.A.: Scott Christopher Adkins v. Mendi Marie McQueen (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Mar 19 2015, 9:29 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Natalie R. Dicke
20 F.3d 889 44 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 146, Medicare & Medicaid GuideP 42,177MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENTAL ACHIEVEMENT CENTER ASSOCIATION;Accessability, Inc.; Canby Developmental AchievementCenter; Mille Lacs County Area Developmental AchievementCenter; Norman County Developmental Achievement Center;Polk County Developmental Achievement Center; Todd CountyDevelopmental Achievement Center; Wadena CountyDevelopmental Achie
21 F.3d 424NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wayne A. STRICKLAND, Plaintiff Appellant,v.L. Douglas WILDER; Mary Sue Terry; Roanoke Times & WorldNews; Natalie Davis; Detective Harris, RoanokeCity Police
United States v. Harrispublic domain
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, with whom BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge, joins and O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and GRABER, Circuit Judges, join with respect to Parts I and III, dissenting from the order rejecting the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The panel in this case has written an opinion for the purpose of rebuking Congress as to its policy for sentencing violent criminals. None of
JAMES WILLIAMS vs STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JAMES WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-103 LT Case No. 2019-CF-001447-A STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Edgar Harrisonpublic domain
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00435-CV UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant V. EDGAR HARRISON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TWYNCEOLA BATISTE DECEASED); HENRY HARRISON; JOHNNY HAYES; ARTINCE HEATHMON; RONALD HENDERSON; ANNIE HILL; ROBERT JAMES HILLAR
United States v. Alvarezpublic domain
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT HERNANDEZ’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Defendant Jairo Hernandez has moved the Court to suppress evidence seized following a search of Mr. Hernandez’s residence. See Docket No. 608 (“Motion”) at 3. The Government Opposes this Motion. See Docket No. 636 (“Opposition”). The Court heard argument on the Motion on May 11, 201
Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTERpublic domain
277 S.W.3d 290 (2009) Harry SCHULTE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant/Respondent. No. ED 91287. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. January 20, 2009. Rehearing Denied February 24, 2009. G. Michael Flotte, Florissant, MO, for appellant. Rodney M. Sharp, Natalie J. Kussart, Sandberg, Phoenix &a;
*12JUDGMENT Per Curiam These petitions for review were considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and were briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cib. R. 36(d). It is ORDERED A
Cite as 2022 Ark. 193 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-22-113 Opinion Delivered: November 3, 2022 ROBINSON NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI D/B/A ROBINSON NURSING AND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT REHABILITATION CENTER [NO. 60CV-14-4568] APPELLANT
Reese v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER NANGLE, District Judge. Currently before the Court is defendant’s motion for partial dismissal. Defendant requests that the Court dismiss various requests for relief in plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion will be denied. BACKGROUND
Graves Ex Rel. Graves v. Stonepublic domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1194 (2002) Sean GRAVES, a minor, by his parents, Randal GRAVES and Natalie Graves, Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson County Sheriff John C. STONE, individually and in his official capacity, Former Jefferson County Sheriff Ronald Beckham, individually and in his official capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Neil Gardner, individually, John Hicks, individually, Mark M. Miller, individually, T. Williams, individually, Mike Guerra,