Cases

People v Cade 2026 NY Slip Op 03820 June 17, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Jahrel Cade, appellant. Supreme Court of the State of N

ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE By Memorandum and Order [Doc. # 26] and Final Judgment [Doc. #27] entered October 11, 2016, the Court granted summary judgment . in favor of Defendant Quicken Loans, Inc. On October 21, 2016, Defendant filed a timely Rule 54(d) Motion for Attorney’s Fees (“Motion”) [Doc. # 29], to which Plaintiffs Alexander Rodriguez and Rosalina-Milian filed a Respon

925 N.E.2d 388 (2010) CLARIAN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. f/k/a Methodist Hospital, Appellant-Defendant, v. Natalie WAGLER, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-0907-CV-598. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 31, 2010. *389 Matthew W. Conner, Tabbert Hahn Earnest & Weddle, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Lisa M. Dill

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: On October 9, 2012, Plaintiffs Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Nextel Corporation, Boost Worldwide, Inc. and Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. (collectively “Sprint” or “Plaintiffs”) brought the above-captioned action against Defendants Jasco Trading, Inc. and Alan Savdie (“the Jasco Defendants”), and YRB Trading

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of the attempted resolution of a dispute between a real estate listing website and one of its co-founders over the propriety of actions taken by the co-founder when he separated from the company in 2007, and the validity of corporate actions that occurred before his departure. It requires us to decide whether the district court had jurisdiction to enforce a settlement ag

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1507 LIDIA LECH, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DOROTHEA VON GOELER; BAYSTATE MEDICAL PRACTICES, INC.; HAMPDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; MARIA DIAZ; NICOLE SKORUPSKI; ELIZABETH MEAUX; SHANTELLE ROSADO; JULIE BELLE-ISLE; LYNN CHASE; MICHAEL J. ASHE, JR.; PATRICIA MURPHY; NICHOLAS COCCHI; NATALIE CRUZ;

13‐1050‐cv StreetEasy, Inc. v. Chertok UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2013 (Submitted: February 10, 2014 Decided: June 5, 2014) Docket No. 13‐1050‐cv

812 F.Supp.2d 492 (2011) A.L. and V.R., individually and on behalf of E.L., Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. No. 10-cv-6841 (BSJ). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 19, 2011. *494 Gary S. Mayerson, Mayerson and Associates, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. Emily Sweet, NYC Law

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel

OPINION EN BANC LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This case, involving speech interests on both sides, arises from the decision of two public high school student publications — the newspaper and yearbook — not to publish an advertisement. The advertisement promoted sexual abstinence and was proffered by a parent, Douglas Yeo, in the aftermath of a decision by the Lexington, Massachusetts School Committee to make cond

762 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. In re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. In re Combined World Trade Center and Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 2010. *632 Marion Sandra M

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 96-1623 DOUGLAS E. YEO, Individually and on Behalf of His Children and as Chairman of the Lexington Parents Information Network, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Town of LEXINGTON, Jeffrey Young, Superintendent, David Wilson, Principal, Samuel Kafrissen, Karen Mechem and Joseph Dini, Chair

131 F.3d 241 122 Ed. Law Rep. 924, 26 Media L. Rep. 1193 Douglas E. YEO, Individually and on Behalf of His Childrenand as Chairman of the Lexington ParentsInformation Network, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.TOWN OF LEXINGTON, Jeffrey Young, Superintendent, DavidWilson, Principal, Samuel Kafrissen, Karen Mechem and JosephDini, Chairman, John Oberteuffer, Lois Coit, Susan Elbergerand Barrie Peltz, Indi

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 96-1623 DOUGLAS E. YEO, Individually and on Behalf of His Children and as Chairman of the Lexington Parents Information Network,

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV