Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00361-CV ___________________________ NATASHA SLOAN, Appellant V. JASON SLOAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-5691-367 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges AtLee and Athey Argued by videoconference PUBLISHED JORDAN ALEXANDER PRICE OPINION BY v. Record No. 0852-20-3 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER DECEMBER

01/16/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 24, 2018 Session NATASHA BATES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 16-CR-286 Sandra Donaghy, Judge ___________________________________

CASTEL, United States District Judge D.H., N.H., K.H., Natasha Martin, and Tiffaney Grissom, who are transgender, and Rosa Gonzalez, Adrienne Bankston, and Sarah Marchando, who are not, are eight women of color who were arrested under New York's prohibition against loitering for the purpose of prostitution, N.Y. Penal Law § 24

{¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur. Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Pu

321 F.Supp.2d 408 (2004) Donna S. JUTE, Plaintiff, v. HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CIV.3:01CV7123(AVC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 14, 2004. *409 *410 Barbara E. Gardner, Manchester, CT, for Plaintiff. Daniel Adam Schwartz, Felix J. Springer, D

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1659 Filed July 3, 2024 MARK IRLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. MARENGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, d/b/a COMPASS MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE, MARENGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES d/b/a COMPASS MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, BARRY G. GOETTSCH, and NATASHA HAUSCHILT, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ App

02-11-197-CV

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00197-CV CITY OF HALTOM CITY APPELLANT V. BRIAN AURELL, INDIVIDUALLY APPELLEES AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF RANGER HUNTER AURELL, A MINOR; JACKI CHANTELL SEXTON-AURELL, INDIVIDUALLY; AARON COLLINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALEXAN

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Orr, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-552.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or ot

Adams v. A.J. Ballard Jr. Tire & Oil Co., 2006 NCBC 9 Adams v. BP Prods. N. Am., Inc., 2006 NCBC 9 Barnett v. BP Prods. N. Am., Inc., 2006 NCBC 9 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION CARTERET COUNTY 01 CVS 1271 BOBBIE ADAMS, TINA ADAMS, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of CODY AD

Kennedy, J. I. Introduction {¶ 1} In this appeal, we resolve a conflict between the Eighth and Ninth District Courts of Appeals on a question that appellant states as follows: “If a defendant is sentenced to prison for a term of incarceration, does the trial court have authority to issue against the defendant, a ‘no contact’ order with the victim?” We answer the question in the negative. A trial court can

People v West (2020 NY Slip Op 08131) People v West 2020 NY Slip Op 08131 Decided on December 31, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge. September 28, 2011, Defendant Lee Enterprises, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment on the counts remaining against it in this matter. United States Magistrate Judge Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations on November 30, 2011, 2011 WL 7462038 (dkt # 181). Both Lee Enterprises and Plaintiff Michael E. Spreadbury filed objections. They are therefore entitle

ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge. March 6, 2012, 856 F.Supp.2d 1195, 2012 WL 734163 (D.Mont.2012), United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations (doc. 250) concerning two summary judgment motions (docs. 148, 150) filed by Defendants Bitterroot Public Library (“the Library”), City of Hamilton (“the City”), Dr. Robert Brophy, Trista Smith, Nansú Roddy, Jerry S

O’Neill, J. Introduction {¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to clarify what evidence a juvenile is entitled to in discovery prior to a bindover hearing. {¶ 2} In answering, we hold that Juv.R. 24 applies in bindover hearings. We also point out that a prosecuting attorney is under a duty

Robert N. Scola, Jr., United States District Judge This case arises out of a decision by Defendant Celebrity Cruises, Inc. to disembark an elderly passenger complaining of medical issues in Barbados for further testing and treatment at a local hospital, and then refusing to allow that passenger and her family to complete the cruise. Now before the Court is the Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) certain claim

OPINION KIRK, Judge. This is a consolidated appeal by appellant Minnesota Commissioner of Public Safety of the district courts’ rescissions of the revocations of the driver’s licenses of respondents Christopher John Williams, Mark Alan Gehrke, and Mary Jo Higgins under Minnesota’s implied consent law, Minn.Stat. §§ 169A.50-.53 (2012). The commissioner argues that there is no statutory or procedural due pr

[Cite as State v. Jones, 2016-Ohio-1320.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-150331 TRIAL NO. 15CRB-5572 Plaintiff-Appellee, : O P I N I O N. vs.

OPINION VAIDIK, Judge. Case Summary The State appeals the trial court's dismissal of a case in which Natasha Durrett allegedly drove a van that struck someone, resulting in serious bodily injury to that person, and allegedly failed to return to the seene of the accident. The State contends that the trial court abused its discretion in concluding that the absence of the van, the victim, and