Cases

558 F.Supp.2d 660 (2008) William R. RHODES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 6:06-cv-00530. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia. June 10, 2008. *662 Named expert: Dr. Elizabeth L. Anderson Gerald R. Rapien, Robert A. Bilott, Taft Stettinius & Hollister

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0052p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NATHAN ROBERTS; FREEDOM TRUCK DISPATCH, LLC, │ on behalf of themselves and

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 13, 2012 Decided August 21, 2012 No. 11-1302 EME HOMER CITY GENERATION, L.P., PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 11-1315, 11-1323, 11-1329, 11-1338,

Case: 25-50695 Document: 219-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2101 Doc: 125 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-2082 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CROWN CEN

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2082 Doc: 146 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-2082 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CROWN CEN

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1644 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CROWN CENTRAL LLC; CROWN CENTRAL NEW HOLDINGS LLC; CHEVRON CORP.; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXON MOBIL CORP.; EXXON

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

Justice Indeglia, with whom Justice Robinson joins, dissenting. Although we agree with the majority’s conclusion that, in view of the ambiguous *1245nature of the facts known to the police, the consent exception to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article 1, section 6 of the Rhode Island Constitution did not justify

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0215 ══════════ Samson Exploration, LLC, f/k/a/ Samson Lone Star, L.P., Petitioner, v. Joe A. Bordages Jr., et al., Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of App

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0215 ══════════ Samson Exploration, LLC, f/k/a/ Samson Lone Star, L.P., Petitioner, v. Joe A. Bordages Jr., et al., Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of App

DECISION Before this Court is the appeal of Robert Marchand and Stephanie Marchand ("Marchands") from a decision of the Zoning Board of Review of the Town of South Kingstown (the "Board"). The Board's decision, recorded on July 21, 2008, granted Daniel and Patricia Tanona ("Tanonas") a dimensional variance from a zoning sideline setback requirement at 36 Middle Road, South Kingstown, Rhode Island (the "property"). Appell

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Plaintiff Stephanie Mykonos brings this action against a large group of District of Columbia and United States government defendants: the United States of America; Sylvia Mathews Burwell, in her official capacity as the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services;

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-12-2003 Tenafly Eruv Assn v. Tenafly Precedential or N

DECISION This matter comes before the Court on the appeal of abutting property owners ("Appellants") from a decision of the Zoning Board of Review of the Town of South Kingstown ("Board") to approve a special use permit allowing the Animal Rescue League of Southern Rhode Island (the "ARL") to construct a new animal shelter on Lot 27, located at 506B Curtis Corner Road in Wakefield, Rhode Island. The Board approved a spec

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–65 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

244 F.Supp.2d 1167 (2003) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff v. Mario OREGON-CORTEZ, Rey Baltazar Aleman-Morales, Walter Saldana, Francisco Javier Garcia, Salvador Torres, Elena Cortez-Sotelo, Donald Ray Martin, Vaughn T. Rael, Ryan Patrick Donohue, Christopher Cornelius Allen, James Dean Santucci, Miguel Rodriguez, Francisco Javier Cortez-Vargas, Jesus Oregon-Cortez, Ascencion Oregon-Cortez, Juan Manuel Oregon, Ignacio CEJA Hernandez, Arturo Gar

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit