Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “National Federation of the Blind of Texas v. Hudspeth”
State of Texas v. United States of Americapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) STATE OF TEXAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1303 ) (TBG-RMC-BAH
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00084-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/3/2025 3:01 PM No. 15-25-00084-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Cartwright v. Public Service Company of New Mexicopublic domain
FEDERICI, District Judge (dissenting). First, it is the opinion of this writer that this is not a proper case in which to determine the applicability of the doctrine of Pueblo Water Rights in the State of New Mexico. This is so for the simple reason that the intervenor Town of Las Vegas does not in this action affirmatively assert such rights, or title to the waters, in itself
United States v. C.R.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349
Young v. Red Clay Consolidated School Districtpublic domain
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. On February 24, 2015, Red Clay Consolidated School District (“Red Clay”) sought approval from voters to increase the school-related property taxes paid by owners of non-exempt real estate located within the school district. The referendum passed with 6,395 residents voting in favor and 5,515 against.
Case No. 04-14-00483-CV ROWLAND J. MARTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS Appellant v. FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT EDWARD BRAVENEC AND 1216 WEST AVE. INC. Appellees BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS u^ APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR REHEARIN
Patrick v. Miss New Mexico-USA Universe Pageantpublic domain
490 F.Supp. 833 (1980) Kathy PATRICK, Miss New Mexico, 1980, Plaintiff, v. MISS NEW MEXICO-USA UNIVERSE PAGEANT, and Miss Universe, Inc., Defendants. No. EP-80-CA-88. United States District Court, W. D. Texas. May 1, 1980. *834 *835 R. Don Thorne, El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff. Richard G
United States v. Defabian C. Shannonpublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part, concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part. I concur with the en banc majority’s decision that Shannon’s Wisconsin conviction for sexually assaulting a thirteen year old child1 constitutes a prior “crime of violence” for purposes of sentencing enhancement under the U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. However, I cannot
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. Statepublic domain
Madsen, J. — The respondents in these consolidated cases raised numerous issues regarding the constitutionality and applicability of Initiative 695 (1-695). The King County Superior Court held the initiative unconstitutional under article II, section 1(b); article II, section 19; and article II, section 37, of the Washington State Constitution. The State of Washington (State) and Intervenor $30 License Tab Initiative Campaign (th
Amalgamated Transit v. Statepublic domain
11 P.3d 762 (2000) AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 587, Respondent, v. STATE of Washington, Appellant. Vashon-Maury Island Community Council, Respondent, v. State of Washington, Appellant. City of Bainbridge Island, Respondent, v. State of Washington, Appellant. Tacoma Water, Respondent, v. State of Washington, Appellant. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Respondent, v. State of Was
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Hall v. Statepublic domain
539 So.2d 1338 (1989) Michael A. HALL v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 57940. Supreme Court of Mississippi. February 9, 1989. *1339 Minor F. Buchanan, Jackson, for appellant. Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by Pat Flynn, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee. EN BANC. ROBERTSON, Justice, for the Court: <
Ralls v. Mansonpublic domain
375 F.Supp. 1271 (1974) John Wesley RALLS v. John R. MANSON, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of Connecticut. Civ. No. H-205. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 7, 1974. *1272 *1273 *1274 Morton P. Cohen, David Golub (Martha Stone on
ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 4853036 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXA
Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospitalpublic domain
446 F.Supp. 1295 (1977) Terri Lee HALDERMAN, a retarded citizen, by her mother and guardian, Winifred Halderman, et al., Plaintiffs, Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. PENNHURST STATE SCHOOL & HOSPITAL et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 74-1345.
in Re George Green and Garlan Greenpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 4956355 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
United States v. Provoopublic domain
THOMSEN, District Judge. John David Provoo, indicted for treason, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and motions to dismiss the indictment under Rules 12 and 48(b), Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 18 U.S.C.A., claiming that he has been denied a speedy trial, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, and that further prosecution of the charge would deprive him of rights under the Fifth Amendment. He has also filed a motion quest
Tharp v. Massengillpublic domain
This is a civil action brought by W.C. Tharp, appellee, plaintiff below, against C.A. Massengill, the appellant, defendant below. The parties will be referred to herein as they were in the lower court, that is plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that on or about the 1st day of January, 1929, he entered into a joint adventure by verbal agreement with defendant to handle personal property and real estate for profit. That the terms and conditions of such advent