Cases

OPINION AND ORDER PAPAK, United States Magistrate Judge. Former plaintiffs Evergreen International Airlines, Inc., and Evergreen International Aviation, Inc. (collectively, “Evergreen”), filed this action against defendants Anchorage Advisors, LLC, Anchorage Capital Group, LLC, and Nex-gen Aviation Capital, LLC, on November 22, 2011. Evergreen amended its complaint effective August 1, 2013. Effective A

OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. We are asked to decide in this appeal whether a financial brokerage agreement gave plaintiff broker the right to a *531commission when defendant owner transferred certain distressed assets to a fund created by the Swiss National Bank as part of a 2008 bailout. We hold that the contract gave plaintiff a standar

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RIVERSIDE RISK ADVISORS LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/ ) Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0789-KSJM ) GRACE I CHING CHAO, )

OPINION OF THE COURT Román, J. In 2008, during the financial crisis that left many financial services companies holding billions of dollars in “toxic assets” (undervalued and underperforming assets), plaintiff and defendant UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. (UBSRE) entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff was to act as UBSRE’s “financial advisor and investment banker in the proposed sale of certain of [U

OPINION OF THE COURT Román, J. In 2008, during the financial crisis that left many financial services companies holding billions of dollars in “toxic assets” (undervalued and underperforming assets), plaintiff and defendant UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. (UBSRE) entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff was to act as UBSRE’s “financial advisor and investment banker in the proposed sale of certain of [U

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RIVERSIDE RISK ADVISORS LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/ ) Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0789-KSJM ) GRACE I CHING CHAO, )

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") brings this action against Defendants Yorkville Advisors, LLC ("YA"), Mark Angelo, and Edward Schinik (collectively, "Defendants"), asserting eight causes of actions in its complaint for alleged violations of: (1) Sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2), and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act (against all Defendants); (2) Section 10(b) of the Exchange Ac

OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from the 112th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a),1 1441, and 1446, and *532seeking damages

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE SAM GLASSCOCK III STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted: May 8, 2023 Date Decided: August 29, 2023 David E. Ross, Esquire

Flaum, Circuit Judge. *526 Susan Nielen-Thomas, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, filed a complaint in Wisconsin state court alleging she and other class members were defrauded by their investment advisor. Defendants removed the case to federal court. They then argued the

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

NUMBER 13-24-00291-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG EDINBURG SRGV, LLC, Appellant, v. RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 476TH DISTRIC

MEMORANDUM OF LAW RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BAYLSON, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff Matthew Mooney is the former employee of an insurance company and has sued the parent and several of its subsidiaries,1 asserting antitrust claims under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (Count I), and New

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. The plaintiffs in this action (“the Named Plaintiffs”) have moved for class certification under Rule 23(b)(1) and (b)(2) for those claims not already certified under those sections and for certification of all claims but one under Rule 23(b)(3). The defendants and certain members of the class (“the Individual Plaintiffs”) do not oppose ce

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FORTIS ADVISORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as the Representative of the former shareholders of Unknown Worlds Entertainment, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 2025-0805-LWW KRAFTON, INC., Defendant. OPINION Date Submitted: January 9, 2026 Date Decided: March 16, 2026 Brian

440 B.R. 282 (2010) In re BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Debtor. Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Plaintiff, v. Stanley Chais, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-01789 (BRL). Adversary No. 09-1172 (BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. November 30, 2010.

*5 Opinion STREETER, J. —Plaintiffs Rincon EV Realty LLC, Rincon ET Realty LLC and Rincon Residential Towers LLC borrowed $110 million in 2007 from Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage, Inc. (Bear Stearns), to finance the purchase of Rincon Towers, a San Lrancisco apartment complex (the Prope

OPINION NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE German American Financial Advisors & Trust Company d/b/a German American Investment Services (“GAFA”), PrimeVest Financial Services, Inc. (“PrimeVest”), and Jeffrey W. Tooley (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their second motion to compel arbitration of Dennis M. Reed’s claims against them. Appellants present

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING BLES MOTION TO DISMISS THE TRUSTEE’S COMPLAINT BURTON R. LIFLAND, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the motion (the “Motion to Dismiss”) of the Taiwanese Bureau of Labor Insurance (“BLI”) seeking to dismiss the complaint (the “Complaint”) of Irving H. Picard, Esq. (the “Trustee”), trustee for the substantively consolidated Securities Investor Protection Ac

OPINION AND ORDER ON CREDIT SUISSE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE NOTEHOLDER ACTIONS JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse, New York Branch (together, “Credit Suisse”), for summary judgment on the claims brought by the Noteholder plaintiffs. The Noteholders are institutional investors who collect