⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “National Rifle Association v. Commissioner, Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-03-14 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 21-12314 Document: 131-1 Date Filed: 03/14/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12314 ____________________ NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIAT
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 21-12314 Document: 86-1 Date Filed: 07/14/2023 Page: 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12314 ____________________ NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION, RADFORD FANT, Plaintiffs-App
District Court, N.D. New York · 2018-11-06 · Published · cited 3× · 350 F. Supp. 3d 94
THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge *104I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff the National Rifle Association of America ("Plaintiff" or "the NRA") commenced this action against defendants New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, both individually and in his official capacity ("Gov. Cuomo"); Superintendent of the New York State Dep
Supreme Court of the United States · 2022-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
7/29/2022 10:37:59 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 20-843.pdf 20-843_new.pdf versus 135 pages (609 KB) 135 pages
Supreme Court of the United States · 2022-06-23 · Published · cited 2346× · 597 U.S. 1; 142 S. Ct. 2111; 213 L. Ed. 2d 387
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-11-02 · Published · cited 50× · 840 F.3d 1268; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19752; 2016 WL 6500595
Case: 16-15549 Date Filed: 11/02/2016 Page: 1 of 140 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-15549 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cv-00438-WKW-TFM
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00005-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/25/2025 2:57 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE No. 15-25-00005-CV CLERK FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS
District Court, D. Maryland · 1986-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 648 F. Supp. 195; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19414
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs are the Frederick County Chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP); the Chapter President, Lord D. Nickens; and JoAnne Evans-Anderson, a black woman, who is Director of Community Relations for the Maryland Human Relations Commission.1 Defendant is the Zoning Administrator (Administrator) of Frederick Count
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-09-09 · Published · cited 14× · 296 F.3d 832
296 F.3d 832 GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP. OF AMERICA; Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. — U.S. Branch; Gerling Global Life Reinsurance Company; Gerling Global Life Insurance Company; Gerling America Insurance Company; and Constitution Insurance Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants-Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Harry W. LOW, in his capacity as the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of California, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appe
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-06-28 · Published · cited 2045× · 177 L. Ed. 2d 894; 130 S. Ct. 3020; 561 U.S. 742; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5523; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 619; 78 U.S.L.W. 4844
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989-09-26 · Published · cited 24× · 886 F.2d 419; 281 U.S. App. D.C. 1; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14662; 1989 WL 109789
886 F.2d 419 281 U.S.App.D.C. 1 PUBLIC CITIZEN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MICROBIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FORFOODS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-5352. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 11, 1989.Decided Sept. 26, 1989.
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2015-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
2nd Court of Appeals Docket Sheet Case Number: 02-14-00143-CV Date Filed: 05/07/2014 9:14AM Style: Appellant Harry Bizios v.Appellee Town of Lakewood Village, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER
District Court, E.D. California · 2001-09-18 · Published · cited 17× · 170 F. Supp. 2d 982; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22287; 2001 WL 1355361
170 F.Supp.2d 982 (2001) In the Matter of the Extradition of Kulbir SINGH, aka Kulbira aka Kulvir Singh Barapind, aka Mahim Mehra, No. CV. 98-5489 OWW. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 27, 2001. Certification and Order of Extraditability September 18, 2001. *983 *984
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-07-15 · Published · cited 2× · 296 F.3d 832
GRABER, Circuit Judge. This case comes before us for the second time. Plaintiffs, which are various insurance companies and a trade association of insurance companies, brought the present action to enjoin Defendant Harry W. Low, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of California (Commissioner), from enforcing a California statute requiring disclosure of information about Holocaust-era insurance policies. The district cour
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-11-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00207-CV Cause No. _________ FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 4:30 PM I
Winchester County Circuit Court · 1994-09-21 · Published · cited 0× · 34 Va. Cir. 421; 1994 Va. Cir. LEXIS 76
By Judge John E. Wetsel, Jr. This case came before the Court for trial on September 16,1994, on the Petition for refund of personal property taxes imposed by the City. The parties appeared with their counsel: French Slaughter and Leon Szeptycki for the Petitioner and Mark Flynn and Collins Denny, III, for the Defendants. The Stipulation of Facts was accepted by the Court, and all prefiled exhibits were admitted into evidence
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1994-04-29 · Published · cited 9× · 852 F. Supp. 471; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5953; 1994 WL 172275
852 F.Supp. 471 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-0126-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. April 29, 1994. *472 Earl Montgomery Tucker, Robert P. Crouch, Jr., Richard A. Lloret, U.S. Atty's Office, Roanoke, VA, Nathaniel Dougla
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000-01-04 · Published · cited 6× · 79 F. Supp. 2d 919; 53 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1623; 28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1289; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23; 2000 WL 11909
79 F.Supp.2d 919 (2000) CHICAGO SCHOOL REFORM BOARD OF TRUSTEES, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff, v. SUBSTANCE, INC., an Illinois Corporation; George N. Schmidt, individually; Jane or John Does (One through Twenty), individually, and Volumes XXIV, Nos. 5 and 6 of Substance (January-February, 1999), in rem, Defendants. Substance, Inc., an Illinois Corporation; and George N. Schmidt, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Paul Vallas,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985-01-08 · Published · cited 54× · 747 F.2d 338
747 F.2d 338 40 Fed.R.Serv.2d 363 Khushro GHANDI, Andrew Rotstein, Richard Magraw, JacquelineCotton, Matthew Moriarty, Elizabeth Moriarty,Stuart Bernsen, Randolph Wedler andBarbara Gettel, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.POLICE DEPARTMENT OF the CITY OF DETROIT, Philip Tannian,Dale Tiderington, Garries Terrell, Melvin Gamblin, RobertPersyn, Donald McKinnon, Leland Blaim, Vernon Higgins,Philip Mer