⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Navarro v. Arpaio”

District Court, D. Arizona · 2009-02-10 · Published · cited 3× · 598 F. Supp. 2d 1025; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13839; 2009 WL 322884
598 F.Supp.2d 1025 (2009) Manuel de Jesus ORTEGA MELENDRES, Plaintiff, v. Joseph M. ARPAIO, et al., Defendant. No. CV-07-2513-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. February 10, 2009. *1029 David Jeremy Bodney, Peter Shawn Kozinets, Karen J. Hartman, Isaac Pasaret Hernandez, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Daniel Joseph Po
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-09-04 · Published · cited 44× · 800 F.3d 1104; 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 786; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15786; 2015 WL 5166942
OPINION TASHIMA., Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we examine the scope of the United States Sentencing Commission’s (the “Commission”) authority to limit the retroactive effect of its amendments to its Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that a district court cannot apply a retroactive amendment to reduce an already imposed sentence prior to that amendment’
Arizona Supreme Court · 2025-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ET AL. Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-23-0283-PR Filed January 31, 2025 Appeal from the Arizona Tax Court The Honorable
Arizona Supreme Court · 2021-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, Defendant/Appellant. No. CV-20-0030-PR Filed August 25, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honora
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE VOLKSWAGEN “CLEAN DIESEL” No. 19-16361 MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:15-md-02672- CRB NICHOLAS BENIPAYO, Plaintiff, and FARCHIONE MOTORS, INC., Claimant-Appellant, v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERIC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-06-24 · Published · cited 22× · 39 F.4th 562
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM J. RICHARDS, No. 19-56205 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-00497- SJO-SP COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; MARK NOURSE; NORMAN PARENT; TOM BRADFORD; JOHN NAVARRO; OPINION DANIEL GREGONIS; NORMAN SPERBER; DOES, 1 throu
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-04-11 · Published · cited 13× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 460; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73132
*463ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. Nos. 71, 72 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge In this ERISA retirement plan case, former Fujitsu employees accuse Fujitsu and a plan administrator, Shepherd Kap-lan, of breaching their fiduciary duties by making imprudent investments. Defendants each move to dismiss th
District Court, N.D. California · 2019-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 389 F. Supp. 3d 728
(Meckley Decl., Ex. B, Ortiz Depo. at 134:1-13; Ortiz Depo. Ex. 2 ("Job Description" at 1).) The Job Description also outlines a shift manager's key job duties as: • Oversee the delivery of Amazon orders to customers • Build, optimize, and assign delivery routes on your shift • Communicate with and respond to Amazon Customer Service associates on
District Court, E.D. California · 2018-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 343 F. Supp. 3d 924
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant County of Sacramento, ("County") Defendant Scott Jones, in his official capacity as Sacramento County Sheriff, ("Sheriff") and Defendant Kamala Harris's, in her official capacity as the California Attorney General, ("AG") (collectively "Defendants") Motions to Dismiss. (ECF No. 35; ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff Gary Wayne Welchen, et al. ("Pl
Maniar v. Wolfpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASHRAF MANIAR and UMAIMA SHAIKH, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-3826 (EGS) ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
District Court, D. Arizona · 2017-03-29 · Published · cited 4× · 248 F. Supp. 3d 946; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89355
ORDER Honorable Rosemary Márquez, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife (“Plaintiffs”)1 (Doc. 52); Defendants Sally Jewell, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (“the Secretary”), and Daniel M. Ashe, Director of the United St
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GORDON COLLEGE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-614 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 186 F. Supp. 3d 1062; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64349; 2016 WL 2851861
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO STRIKE Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge - Qualified California drivers are entitled to purchase “Good Driver Discount” auto insurance policies. Plaintiffs Edd King, Diedre King, Elmo Sheen, and Sheila Lee allege that they are qualified “Good Drivers.” Plaintiffs allege that Defendants National General Insurance Comp
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 313 F. Supp. 3d 1237
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. *1240Dkt. # 122. The Court held oral argument on May 1, 2018, after which the Court directed the parties to submit additional briefing.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 8× · 365 F. Supp. 3d 28
TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge This decision resolves three motions currently pending before the court: (1) Defendants' *33Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 14 ; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 16 ; and (3) Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 22. Having reviewed the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-05-17 · Published · cited 63× · 924 F.3d 684
DIAZ, Circuit Judge: In 2012, the Secretary of Homeland Security established the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA") policy. Under this policy, certain noncitizens who came to the United States as children could receive deferred action-a decision forbearing their removal from the country. Hundreds of thousands of individuals, including
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) COUNCIL OF PARENT ATTORNEYS ) AND ADVOCATES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-1636 (TSC) ) ) ELIZABETH (BETSY) DEVOS, ) SECRETARY OF EDUCATIO
S.A. v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 363 F. Supp. 3d 1048
LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge *1053TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1053 STATEMENT...1056 1. The Immigration and Nationality Act and Parole Generally...1056 2. The Complaint...1056 2.1 September-December 2014: The Creation of the CAM Parole
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-03-28 · Published · cited 1× · 363 F. Supp. 3d 109
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Eleven states and the District of Columbia have sued the Department of Labor ("DOL"),1 alleging that its final rule interpreting *117the definition of "employer" in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"),
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-03-04 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NATIONAL WOMEN’S LAW CENTER, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-cv-2458 (TSC) ) ) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND ) BUDGET, et al.,