Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Nazomi Communications Inc v. Samsung Telecommunications Inc”
Nazomi Communications, Inc. v. Microsoft Mobile Oypublic domain
LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Nazomi Communications, Inc. (“Nazo-mi”) appeals from the decisions of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California construing disputed claim limitations and granting summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patents 7,080,362 (“the '362 patent”) and 7,225,436 (“the '436 patent”) (collectively, “the hardware patents”) and U.S. Patent 6,338,160 (“the '160 patent” or “the s
Smartflash LLC v. Apple Inc.public domain
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“R &
Nextpoint, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge In this action, plaintiff asserts that defendants infringe U.S. Pat. No. 8,447,731 (the “ ’731 patent”), titled Method and System for Information Management. Defendants have moved to dismiss the action on the ground that the claimed invention is ineligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101. For the reasons th
(2008) JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE, INC., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. CIBA VISION CORPORATION, Defendant Counterclaim Plaintiff. Nos. 3:05-cv-135-J-32TEM, 3:06-cv-301-J-32TEM. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. March 14, 2008. CORRECTED MARKMAN ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge. <
Invt Spe LLC v. Itcpublic domain
Case: 20-1903 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 08/31/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INVT SPE LLC, Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee HTC AMERICA, INC., HTC CORPORATION, Intervenors ______________________ 2020-1903 __
Invt Spe LLC v. Itcpublic domain
Case: 20-1903 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 08/31/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INVT SPE LLC, Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee HTC AMERICA, INC., HTC CORPORATION, Intervenors ______________________ 2020-1903 __
BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY TEX. v. Benq Americapublic domain
533 F.3d 1362 (2008) BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BENQ AMERICA CORP., Motorola, Inc., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd., and Chi Mei Communication Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Kyocera Wireless Corp., Defendant-Appellee, and Innostream, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Wistron Corporation, Defendants, and HTC Corp., High Tech Computer Corporation, Sanyo North America Corp., LG
PROST, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System (“Board of Regents”) appeals a final judgment by the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Tex. Sys. v. BENQ Am. Corp., No. 1:05-CV-181 (W.D.Tex. May 2, 2007). The district court entered final judgment after the parties stipulated that Defendants-Appellees BENQ Ame