Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

EDMONDSON, J. ¶ 1 Plaintiffs brought an action in the. District Court for Custer County and claimed a convenience store negligently and recklessly sold low-point beer, to a noticeably intoxicated person who injured plaintiffs in a vehicle collision several hours later. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted by the trial court.1 We reverse the judgment

(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ASHISH CHORDIA, LAMPROS ) KALAMPOUKAS, RAGHU KODIGE, ) RAVI SARMA, RICHARD ANDRADES, ) ASHISH BALDUA, JOHN GEE, KAJAL ) VIBHAKAR, THE SHAOIE CHAN ) CHORDIA GST TRUST, THE SAMAY ) KODIGE GST TRUST, and THE VEVAAN ) KODIGE GST TRUST, ) ) Plaintiffs, )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Kehinde Oguntoyinbo’s *1207Motion to Suppress, filed January 23, 2013 (Doc. 95) (“Motion to Suppress”); and (ii) Agreed Order to Join in Defendant Oguntoyindo’s [sic] Motion to Suppress, filed March 4, 2013 (Doc. 109).

OSCN Found Document:BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant ASI New Mexico, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 100] and Supporting Memorandum, filed March 3, 2014 (Doc. 182)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on April 22, 2014. The primary issue is whether Defendant

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge At the conclusion of a three-day bench trial held in July of 2015, this Court determined that Defendant Geoffrey Napper is liable for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and conversion in connection with Napper's appropriation and control of the food-service business in Capitol Heights, Maryland that is presently named "Everlasting Life Restaurant & Lounge." See

HALLER, J. *268The Orange County Water District (the District) brought this action to recover costs associated with the North Basin Groundwater Protection Project (NBGPP), a proposed $200 million effort intended to address groundwater contamination in northern Orange County, California caused by volatile organic compounds (VOC's) and other ch

331 F.Supp.2d 673 (2004) ENGATE, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES, L.L.C. and Atkinson-Baker, Inc. Defendants. No. 01 C 6204. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 20, 2004. *674 *675 *676 Joseph A. Grear, Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) YAH KAI WORLD WIDE ) ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-cv-2174 (KBJ)

Filed 6/22/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, D070771 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 04CC00715) ALCOA GLOBAL FASTENERS, INC. et al.,

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

Filed 6/1/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, D070771 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 04CC00715) ALCOA GLOBAL FASTENERS, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL fr

ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18

782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN GLEESON, District Judge: CONTENTS A. Preliminary Statement.......................................................214 1. Structure of a Credit Card Transaction; Interchange Fees....................214 2. The Default Interchange Rule; Honor-all-Cards Rules; Anti-Steering Rules ...................................

December 16, 2015 CHARLES N. DRAPER, Appellant, Pro Se § CAUSE NO. 03-15-00741-CV § V. § IN THE THIRD COURT § OF APPEALS GREG GUERNSEY, § IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF § at Austin, Texas PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT § WATERSHED P