Cases

OPINION CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge: In May 2008, the Trustees of the IBEW Pacific Coast Pension Fund learned that the Fund would soon enter “critical status” under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. In response, the Trustees amended the Pacific Coast Fund Pension Plan twice — in Amendments 14 and 24 — and began withholding at least $1.00 per hour from all

People v Floyd (2023 NY Slip Op 03802) People v Floyd 2023 NY Slip Op 03802 Decided on July 12, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

753 F.2d 498 Floyd SPRUYTTE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Richard WALTERS and Ronald Schink, Defendants-Appellees. No. 82-1676. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 16, 1984.Decided Jan. 28, 1985. Meri Anne Stowe, Lansing, Mich. (court-appointed), for plaintiff-appellant.

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Richard Floyd McCoy, Jr., was convicted by a jury of aircraft piracy under 49 U.S.C. § 1472(i)(l) and he now appeals his sentence of forty-five years. The only point raised on appeal concerns the validity of a search warrant which purported to authorize a search of McCoy’s home. In view of the narrow issue

773 P.2d 401 (1989) Charles FLOYD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, INC., Martin C. Lindem, Jr., M.D., Lynn L. Wilcox, M.D., and St. Mark's Hospital, Defendants and Respondents. No. 880243-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. April 28, 1989. D. Clayton Fairbourn (argued), Fairbourn & Peshell, Midvale, for plaintiff and appellant.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1075 ___________________________ Floyd County Mutual Insurance Association, as subrogee on behalf of Clark R. McGregor, on behalf of Ronald R. McGregor Revocable Trust on behalf of McGregor Farms, Inc. Pla

764 F.Supp.2d 945 (2011) LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Michael R. FLOYD d/b/a Floyd & Floyd Contractors, Defendant. Case No. 1:09-0082. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division. February 7, 2011. *947 Brandon R. Rule, James J. Proszek, Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C

396 F.3d 697 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Floyd BRUCE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-3110. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: August 3, 2004. Decided and Filed: February 3, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: J.

2016 WI 46 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2316-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Richard J. Sulla, Defendant-Appellant. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS (Rep

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION 556 *554II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................557 III. APPLICABLE LAW.....................................................563 A. Monell Liability..........................

823 So.2d 1112 (2002) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Floyd NELSON, Appellant. No. 36,266-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 14, 2002. Louisiana Appellate Project by Carey J. Ellis, III, Abita Springs, Indigent Defender Board by Kammi R. Whatley, Shreveport, for Appellant. Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General, Paul J. Carmouche, District Att

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This case is the appeal of the denial of a motion to intervene and motion for relief from judgment filed by the mother in a prohibition case arising from a custody dispute. The motions were filed after the Eighth District Court of Appeals granted a writ of prohibition sought by relator-appellee, N.G., to prohibit respondents-appellees, the Juvenile Division of th

Matish, Acting Chief Justice: *259 The Petitioner, the Honorable Margaret L. Workman, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, brought this proceeding under the original jurisdiction of this Court as a petition for a writ of mandamus that seeks to halt impeachment proc

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONALD CONE, Defendant-Appellant,  No. 11-4888 and CHUN-HUI ZHAO; RICHARD J. NELSON, Cisco Systems, Inc., Parties-In-Interest.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff - Appellee,

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. JjThe defendants appeal the trial court’s judgment which taxed all costs against them as the unsuccessful litigants in a medical malpractice suit. Given the record lacks sufficient evidence for this Court to reverse the trial court’s award of taxable costs, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s judgment assessing all costs, totaling $154,470.37, agai

225 F.Supp.2d 1209 (2002) Gensiro KAWAMOTO, Plaintiff, v. CB RICHARD ELLIS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Civ. No. 02-00283 SOM/KSC. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. September 19, 2002. *1210 Shelby Anne Floyd (argued), Jerilynn Ono Hall (appeared, but did not argue), Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI,

72 F.Supp.2d 13 (1999) Pamela NILES and Tender Murphy, Plaintiffs, v. Peter NELSON; Anthony Peetz; and the Hancock Central School Board of Education; Richard Dillon, individually and as Superintendent of Schools of the Hancock Central School District; and Robert Wrighter, Sr., Terry Whitt, Harvey English, Frank Brown, Maureen Hunt, and Ruth Vitale, individually and as members of the Hancock Central School Board of Education; and their agents, emp

164 P.3d 384 (2007) 2007 UT 42 Enrique MARTINEZ, Respondent, v. MEDIA-PAYMASTER PLUS/CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, and Labor Commission of Utah, Petitioners. Nos. 20050745, 20050750. Supreme Court of Utah. May 18, 2007. *387 Richard R. Burke, Salt Lake City, for respondent. Merrill F.

688 So.2d 971 (1997) Michael Eugene NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 96-1506. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 26, 1997. *972 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Att

The issue controlling this appeal is whether or not the evidence establishes as a matter of law that appellant, Tom F. Nelson, and his minor son, Gene Nelson, were engaged in a joint enterprise at the time of the collision in issue as appellant was absolved from any acts of negligence by the jury findings in the cause. Appellant, Tom F. Nelson, plaintiff in the trial court, was injured while riding in an automobile with his minor son, Gene Nelson. The automobile driven by Gene