Cases

945 N.E.2d 634 (2011) Chris NELSON, Mike Luckenbach, and Toni S. Duncan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT, an Illinois Unit of Local Government; Timothy J. Mitchell, General Superintendent & Chief Executive Officer; Darlene Lesniak, Secretary; Chicago Park District Commissioners, President: Gery J. Chico; Vice-President: Bob Pickens; Commissioner: Margaret T. Burroughs; Commissioner Martin Laird Koldyke; Commissioner Daniel

*1069520 U. S. 937; ante, p. 826; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 842; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 863; a

[Cite as Johnson v. Port Clinton, 2025-Ohio-3100.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OTTAWA COUNTY Kent D. Johnson Court of Appeals No. OT-24-036 Appellant Trial Court No. 2024 CVH 051 v. City of Port Clinton, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellees

72 F.3d 1354 69 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 953, 64 USLW 2441 Paula Corbin JONES, Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.William Jefferson CLINTON, Appellant-Cross-Appellee.Danny Ferguson, Defendant.United States of America; Akhil Reed Amar, SouthmaydProfessor of Law Yale Law School; Susan Low Bloch,Professor of Law, Georgetown Law School; Harold H. Bruff,Donald Phillip Rothschild Research Professor, Ge

Supreme Court No. 2023-310-Appeal. (WC 17-376) Judith Clinton : v. : Chad Babcock et al. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 250 Benefit Street, Provide

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Jefferson County, No. 99-1-00086-8, William E. Howard, J., entered August 12, 1999. Affirmed in part and remanded by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Morgan and Houghton, JJ.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE, No. 21-15616 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 4:21-cv-00081- RCC-LAB CATRICIA HOWARD; PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, Acting Chairman of the U.S. Parole Commission, OPINI

DANA, Justice. [¶ 1] Kenneth Irving, Jr. appeals from the summaiy judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Kravchuk, C.J.) in favor of the Town of Clinton on Irving’s breach of contract claim. Because we conclude that an express condition precedent to the contract did not occur, we affirm the judgment. [¶ 2] The underlying facts in this ease are not in dispute. On June 19,1996, Ir

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge. We have before us the defendants’ motion for an extension of time within which to file an amended notice of appeal. For the reasons given below, the motion is denied. We filed our opinion and order awarding the plaintiffs their attorneys’ fees and expenses on October 24, 1991. 776 F.Supp. 465 (E.D.Ark.). The defendants incorrectly appealed from that order to the Supreme

70 So.3d 190 (2011) Billy NELSON and Gaynelle Nelson, Individually and as Parents and Next Friends of Justin Nelson, and as Representatives of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries and Heirs of Bobby Nelson, Deceased v. BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL—NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC.; William E. Henderson, Jr., M.D.; Oxford Clinic for Women, A Partnership; Ira Lamar Couey, M.D., General Partner; R. Blake Smith, M.D., General Partner; William E. Henderson, Jr., M.D.,

Nelson v Hamlet (2025 NY Slip Op 04012) Nelson v Hamlet 2025 NY Slip Op 04012 Decided on July 2, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

ORDER HENRY WOODS, District Judge. I. Introduction . This case was filed in November, 1983 and certified as a class action September 24, 1984. The class consisted of eight named plaintiffs and “all other institutionalized persons who now, or in the future, are in the custody of the Department of Human Services, including the Division of Mental Health and the Division of Developmental D

Case: 17-70012 Document: 00516806960 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 30, 20

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00311-CR Ex parte Philip Clinton Allen FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2010-110-001, THE HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Phillip Clinton Allen filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus seeking an out of time appeal from his pr

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Arntanaro Nelson, initiated this appeal, asserting that his criminal conviction from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas should be dismissed because his right to a speedy trial was violated. {¶ 2} Appellant avers in his single assignment of error that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss when more than 90 days had elapsed betwe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRETT ANDREW NELSON, Petitioner, v. Case No. 21-cv-1169 (CRC) DANIEL AUSTIN WALZL, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Brett Andrew Nelson, appearing pro se, has filed a motion under the Federal Arbitra

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) NELSON’S CABINETRY, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) Civil Action No. 24-1335 (PLF) ) ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ) Secretary of State, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) OPINION Plaintiff Nelson’s Cabinetry, Inc., a Virginia corporation, filed an employment-based visa petition on behalf of Carlos Eduardo Pimentel, an employee of Nelson’s Cabinetry and a Brazilian national. The consular officer ultimately denied Mr. Pimentel’s visa

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed October 31, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00772-CV CLINTON J. POHLER, Appellant V. CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court Llano County, Texas Trial Court C

12/19/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 13, 2019 Session BATTERY ALLIANCE, INC. v. CLINTON BEITER ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003843-17 Robert Samual Weiss, Judge _______________________

CLINTON, Judge, dissenting. In my view the evidence is insufficient to support the jury verdict that appellant committed murder in the course of robbery. The evidence shows without serious dispute that after the assault appellant went through Howard’s property, took some valuables, and then took his car. That appellant in fact ultimately took valuable property belonging to Howard is certainly evidence showing