Cases

700 S.E.2d 357 (2010) SKALIY v. METTS et al. No. S10A0881. Supreme Court of Georgia. September 20, 2010. *358 Troy A. Lanier, Tucker, Everitt, Long, Brewton, & Lanier, Augusta, Gary J. Toman, Nations, Toman & McKnight, Atlanta, for appellant. Ziva P. Bruckner, Capers, Dunbar, Sanders, Bruckner & Bellotti, Augus

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maurice Dunbar appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. Because Dunbar may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismissal order is interl

ORDER PER CURIAM. The Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund (Fund) appeals from the “Temporary Award Modifying the Award and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge” (award) issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) finding Fantasy Bus Limousine Service (Employer) and Fund liable for additional medical bills stemming from James Metis’s back

885 F.2d 157 James Kenneth GOODWIN; Eddie Earl Hallman, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.James R. METTS, individually and in his official capacity asSheriff of Lexington County, South Carolina; Vernon O.Maxwell, individually and in his official capacity as aLexington County Deputy Sheriff, Defendants-Appellants,andRalph Bishop, individually and d/b/a Bishop Salvage Company,Defendant. No. 88-2135.

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge: After a jury trial, Vernon 0. Maxwell was held liable for wrongful prosecution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The jury found Maxwell and James R. Metts liable for common law malicious prosecution. It awarded compensatory damages to the plaintiffs, James Kenneth Goodwin and Eddie Earl Hallman, and assessed punitive damages against Maxwell. Metts and Maxwell appeal from the district court’s denial of th

Prevention of race amalgamation, safeguarding the racial integrity of white peoples and the racial integrity of negro peoples, is the fixed public policy of Alabama. It is written into our Constitution in these words: "The legislature shall never pass any law to authorize or legalize any marriage between any white person and a negro, or descendant of a negro." Article IV, § 102, Constitution of 1901. It finds legislative expression in our miscegenation statute, which reads:

Goolsby, Judge: The issue in this action for conversion of personal property is whether the lower court erred in permitting the respondent Zeagler Auto Service, Inc. (Zeagler), to file a late answer to the appellant Phillip Nelson’s complaint. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm. Zeagler, a wrecker service, áud Motor Credit Company, Inc. (Motor Credit), an automobile finance company, allegedly conve

215 F.3d 608 (6th Cir. 2000) Andrew Hedgepeth, Celia Burson, David McCleary, and Gaynell Metts, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.State of Tennessee, State of Tennessee Department of Safety, and Mike Green, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the State of Tennessee Department of Safety, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-5166 UNITED STATES

ON REHEARING Before BROWN, STEWART, DREW, MOORE and HARRISON (Ad Hoc), JJ. HARRISON, J. (Ad Hoc).1 We granted rehearing to reconsider our earlier opinion in this case. Finding that there was no coverage on the insured’s vehicle at the time of the accident because the insurer properly can-celled its insured’s entire policy for nonpayment of a premium,

TROTT, Circuit Judge: Epix, Inc. appeals á summary judgment for ' Interstellar Starship Services, Ltd. (“ISS”), and ISS cross-appeals the denial of its request for attorneys’ fees. In a published opinion, 983 F.Supp. 1331 (D.Or.1997), the district court held that ISS’s maintenance of an internet web page at “epix.com” did not infringe Epix’s registered trademark, “EPIX,” and granted declaratory judgment to ISS. The distric

JaSCHOTT, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs have appealed from a dismissal of their suit against defendant on an exception of res judicata. We affirm. In 1976 defendant expropriated two parcels of ground of which plaintiffs were co-owners. They contested the expropriation, including the defendant’s allegations that the property was being taken for the public purpose of a park. They eventually settled the

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DORA L. IRIZARRY, Chief Judge In the underlying first-party action, plaintiff DMJ Associates, L.L.C. (“DMJ”) brought an environmental cleanup cost recovery claim against various defendants, including Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon Mobil”) and Quanta Resources Corporation (“Quanta”), upder § 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”),

Stamp Rite Tool & Die Corp. v Branded Leather, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 01832) Stamp Rite Tool & Die Corp. v Branded Leather, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 01832 Decided on March 26, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New Y

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 30] and denies *1111Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [D

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED112122 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County v. ) Cause No. 20

ANSTEAD, Chief Judge, concurring specially: Although I disagree with the holding in the majority opinion and have expressed my reasons in my dissent in the Progressive American Insurance Co. v. McKinnie case, I agree that our decision herein is controlled by the decision in McKinnie.

MEMORANDUM * Felix Felipe appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a mistrial on two grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Because the facts are known to the parties, we do not recite them here. We need not decide whether to apply harmless or plain error analysis to the first issue.1 The Government satisfied the

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR LARRY D. BLANKENSHIP, ) No. ED108824 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) Franklin Count

653 F.3d 1043 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosa Miriam DELLA PORTA, AKA Rosa Miriam Galan-Lopez, AKA Rosa Miriam Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50168. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 2011. Filed August 8, 2011. *1044 Ethan Balogh (argued) a

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-1588 & 20-1666 KENNETH SMITH, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. DEANNA BROOKHART, Warden, Lawrence Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. ____________________ Appeals from United States Distr