Cases

DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge *1089INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Partial Motion to Dismiss and Strike Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") brought by Defendant 3M Company ("3M" or "Defendant") (Doc. No. 87). For the reasons set forth below, the Court gran

ORDER The parties having so agreed, it is ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2025 Term FILED November 7, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 23-717 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Andover Healthcare, Inc., appeals an order of the district court 1 denying And-over’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for discovery to be used in a patent-infringement suit in Germany. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and we therefore affirm the order.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0424p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - NIC

ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on defendant Crane Co.’s (“Crane”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court denies Crane’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff James Wilson Chesher (“Chesher”), a former machinist mate and a commissioned officer in the U.S. Navy, together with his wife, plaintiff

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-1105 _____________________________ MIRELA HALILOVIC-SEVICK, Appellant, v. PATRICK J. EVERS and 3M COMPANY, a Florida profit corporation, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Brad Stetson, Judge. January 30, 2019

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge: This petition for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s assessment of civil penalties turns on the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2462, the direct descendant of a statute of limitations enacted more than a century and a half ago. There, are three questions. Does § 2462 apply to administrative proceedings? If so, is a proc

507 F.3d 442 (2007) NICSAND, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 05-3431. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 7, 2007. Decided and Filed: October 17, 2007. *443 *444 *445

17 F.3d 1453 38 ERC 1259, 305 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 62USLW 2549,24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,544 3M COMPANY (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING), Petitioner,v.Carol M. BROWNER, Administrator of Environmental ProtectionAgency and Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. No. 92-1126. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit.

225 Wis.2d 240 (1999) 592 N.W.2d 194 IN the MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Robin A. NELSON, Attorney at Law. BOARD OF ATTORNEYS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, Complainant, v. Robin A. NELSON, Respondent. No. 98-3368-D. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Filed April 27, 1999. *241 ¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Beverly Dale Jolly and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. General Electric Company, et al., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2017-002611 Appeal From Spartanburg County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5858 Heard November 2, 2020 – Filed September 1, 2021

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AEARO TECHNOLOGIES ) LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N23C-06-255-SKR CCLD ) ACE AMERICAN ) INSURANCE COMPANY, et ) al. )

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1391 DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and AMETEK, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Haveg

443 So.2d 111 (1983) 3M ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Acadia Development Corporation, Miami Gardens Development Corporation and Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellants, v. Mario VIGOA and Maria Vigoa, Appellee. Nos. 82-35, 82-111. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 21, 1983. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1983. Haddad, Jose

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 30, 2025. In The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00059-CV ROY ERIKSEN, Appellant V. JANE NELSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court