Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “Nemee v. Harrington”
Gavulic v. Boyerpublic domain
195 Mich. App. 20 (1992) 489 N.W.2d 124 GAVULIC v. BOYER Docket No. 134535. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided July 7, 1992, at 9:15 A.M. Daguanno, Nemes & Accettura (by Robert F. Harrington), for the plaintiff. Eric J. McCann, P.C. (by Eric J. McCann), for the defendants. Before: GRIBBS, P.J., an
Holland v. Liedelpublic domain
197 Mich. App. 60 (1992) 494 N.W.2d 772 HOLLAND v. LIEDEL Docket No. 132122. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided November 17, 1992, at 10:00 A.M. Sachs, Waldman, O'Hare, Helveston, Hodges & Barnes, P.C. (by Kathleen L. Bogas and Barbara M. Robinson), for the plaintiff. Daguanno, Nemes & Accettura (by
990 A.2d 118 (2010) MV TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (HARRINGTON), Respondent. No. 974 C.D. 2009. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted October 30, 2009. Decided February 25, 2010. David G. Greene, Philadelphia, for petitioner. *119 No appearance entered on behalf
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2022-Ohio-4344.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. Earle E. Wise, P.J. : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Pat
United States v. Gallopublic domain
WINTER, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises in stark form the question of under what circumstances a defendant is entitled to a dismissal of an indictment where his fifth amendment rights have been violated by the inadvertent inclusion of prior immunized testimony in an application for electronic surveillance that led to evidence of his criminality. Julie Miron testified under a grant of immunity before
United States v. Fred Romanopublic domain
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. The question raised in this appeal from a criminal conviction is whether the Government’s evidence was obtained in violation of the use immunity that had earlier been granted to the defendant, Ferdinand (Fred) Romano, under 18 U.S.C. §§ 6001-6005. Twice in the spring of 1976, Romano had testified unde
United States v. Gallopublic domain
859 F.2d 1078 57 USLW 2279 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Joseph N. GALLO, Joseph Armone, Joseph Corrao, RobertDiBernardo, James Failla, Joseph Zingaro, Thomas Agro,Robert Desimone, Jack Giardano, Angelo Ruggiero, AnthonyVitta, George Daly, Louis Giardina, Salvatore Migliorisi,Julie Miron, Mildred Russo, Defendants,Julie Miron, Defendant-Appellant. No. 560, Doc
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
United States v. Jerome G. Beerypublic domain
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Jerome G. Beery was charged with three counts of concealing assets from Dan E. Turner, the receiver and later the trustee in the bankruptcy proceeding in which Beery was adjudicated a bankrupt, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152 (1970). Beery was similarly charged with one count of withholding a document from the receiver/trustee in vi