⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “New London Tobacco Market, Inc. v. Kentucky Fuel Corporation”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-08-09 · Published · cited 53× · 44 F. 4th 393
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0178p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NEW LONDON TOBACCO MARKET, INC.; FIVEMILE │ ENERGY, LLC,
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2023-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
09/28/2023 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 9, 2022 Session COMMERCIAL PAINTING COMPANY INC. v. THE WEITZ COMPANY LLC ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-06-1573 JoeDae L.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010-11-23 · Published · cited 26× · 630 F.3d 263; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24053; 2010 WL 4723183
630 F.3d 263 (2010) IMS HEALTH INC., Verispan, LLC, Source Healthcare Analytics, Inc., a subsidiary of Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William H. SORRELL, as Attorney General of the State of Vermont, Jim Douglas, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Vermont, and Robert Hofmann, in his capacity as Secretary of the Agency of Human Services of the States
District Court, E.D. New York · 2006-09-25 · Published · cited 47× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 992; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73196; 2006 WL 2726102
449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012-03-20 · Published · cited 47× · 851 F. Supp. 2d 1040; 2012 WL 948365
*1047MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. This is a consumer class action certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) for settlement. The class is large — over one hundred million payment-card1 holders — and dispersed across the country. Despite a vigorous notice campaign, only eleven valid
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998-10-20 · Published · cited 10× · 26 F. Supp. 2d 815; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16677; 1998 WL 743934
26 F.Supp.2d 815 (1998) IDV NORTH AMERICA, INC. and R & A Bailey Co. Limited, Plaintiffs, v. S & M BRANDS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:97cv809. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. October 20, 1998. *816 *817 *818
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979-04-10 · Published · cited 74× · 177 Conn. 304; 417 A.2d 343; 10 A.L.R. 4th 230; 1979 Conn. LEXIS 743
177 Conn. 304 (1979) CALDOR'S, INC., ET AL. v. BEDDING BARN, INC., ET AL. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued February 13, 1979. Decision released April 10, 1979. LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO, PETERS and RUBINOW, JS. William R. Murphy, with whom was Robert W. Allen, for the appellants-appellees (plaintiffs). Maurice T. FitzMaurice, Bern
District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977-07-29 · Published · cited 40× · 444 F. Supp. 648; 197 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 342; 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14734
444 F.Supp. 648 (1977) The DUPLAN CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEERING MILLIKEN, INC., Deering Milliken Research Corporation, Moulinage et Retorderie de Chavanoz, Ateliers Roannais de Constructions Textiles, and ARCT, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 71-306. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division. July 29, 1977.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-09-06 · Published · cited 52× · 114 F.4th 605
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0213p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ROBERT GREER, JEFFREY RIEMER, JANE BARKER, │ TUCKER GOODMAN, DOLORES
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-09-21 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0216p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BLISS COLLECTION, LLC dba bella bliss, │ Plaint
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003-07-31 · Published · cited 18× · 839 A.2d 942; 365 N.J. Super. 520
839 A.2d 942 (2003) 365 N.J. Super. 520 DEBRA F. FINK, D.M.D., MS, PC and Joel Fink, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. RICOH CORPORATION, Defendant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County. Decided July 31, 2003. *948 Michael E. Gogal, Passaic, (Epstein, Fitzsimmons, B
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999-10-27 · Published · cited 9× · 80 F. Supp. 2d 352; 53 Fed. R. Serv. 766; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20571; 1999 WL 1390368
80 F.Supp.2d 352 (1999) Renato P. MARIANI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Federal Election Commission, Intervenor-Defendant. No. 3:CV-98-1701. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. October 27, 1999. *353 *354 Eli C. Schulman, Floyd Abrams, Susan Buckley, Jame
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2026-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Record No. 0882-25-3 REBECCA SUE ORANGE v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Causey, Raphael and Duffan Argued at Lexington, Virginia Opinion Issued July 28, 2026 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BEDFORD
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS