Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Augustus C. Agate, J. *532Plaintiffs move for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, arguing that there are no issues of fact in dispute. On May 26, 2005, plaintiffs and defendant entered into a contract of sale whereby plaintiffs would purchase defendant’s residential property for $739,500. Plaintiffs gave

Flaum, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants purchased land near a former General Electric Company manufacturing plant that had operated for sixty years; the plant leached toxic chemicals that seeped into the groundwater. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency filed suit under state law against General Electric in 2004 and has been working with the company since then to investigate and develop a plan to address the contaminatio

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

TYSON, Judge. *409 JOC Farms, LLC ("JOC") appeals from the trial court's order, which granted CNH Industrial America, LLC, d/b/a Case IH ("Case") summary judgment on JOC's claims for breach of warranty, fraud, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. We affirm the trial court's order.

OPINION PORTLEY, Judge. ¶ 1 Consumer Lending Associates, L.L.C. (“CLA”) challenges the summary judgment granted in favor of Next Gen Capital, L.L.C. (“Next Gen”) on a breach of lease claim. Finding no genuine dispute of material fact or legal error, we affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶ 2 CLA, a Nevada company, is engaged in the business of transferring money, whether by

Villnave Constr. Servs., Inc. v Crossgates Mall Gen. Co. Newco, LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 00235) Villnave Constr. Servs., Inc. v Crossgates Mall Gen. Co. Newco, LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 00235 Decided on January 13, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0076p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ KARL TOBIEN, │ Plaintiff-A

Hon. Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, four individuals and six business entities from Fukushima Prefecture in Japan, bring this proposed class action against Defendant General Electric Co. ("GE") seeking monetary damages for property damage and economic harm caused by the tragic 2011 tsunami and resulting nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi N

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA25-739 Filed 15 July 2026 Swain County, No. 24CV001236-860 GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS RAILROAD, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MACH 2 INVESTMENTS, LLC; CHRIS GREEN; ISABELLE GREEN; NELSON EDWARD JOHNSTON; AMBER N. VANLUE JOHNSTON; WAYNE ROBERTS; CYNTHIA HYDE; TAMMY R. THOMAS AS TRUSTEE OF THE TAMMY R. THOMAS LIVING TRUST DATED 06/01/2011; IMPACT CHURCH OF NORTH C

OPINION OF THE COURT Moskowitz, J. This case is one of many commenced in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. As in many of the other cases that have come before us — including one nearly identical to this case 1 — the action is based upon the sale of residential mortgage-backed securit

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NEW START HOLDINGS, LLC., ) including protected series 22 6th ) Series and 804 Marshall Series and ) CHENXI LI, ) ) Plaintiffs/Counterclaim ) Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0831-MTZ ) ZI JUN ZHOU, and MARVIN ) DANIELS, as Truste

*1141BERZON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Neither 11 U.S.C. § 1123(d) nor any. other provision of the Bankruptcy Code provides a definition of “cure” contrary to the one this Court announced in Great Western Bank & Trust v. Entz-White Lumber & Supply, Inc. (In re Entz-White Lumber & Supply, Inc.), 850 F.2d 1338, 1340 (9th Cir. 1988).

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County *1170 (Joseph W. Latham, A.J.), entered January 4, 2016. The order denied the application of petitioner for authority to enter certain real property. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00282-CV New Braunfels Stewardship Properties, LLC and Harold T. Ray, III, Appellants v. Circle F Investments, LP and Original DFI, LLC, Appellees FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2021-0208D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING ME

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Palmetto Construction Group, LLC, Respondent, v. Restoration Specialists, LLC, Reuben Mark Ward, and Lynnette Pennington Ward, Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2022-001224 Appeal From Charleston County Mikell R. Scarborough, Master-in-Equity Opinion No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MADAKET LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-2928 (JEB) SWEET GRACE DISTILLING COMPANY, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION For sixteen years, Plaintiff Madaket LLC has owned and operated Mexican restaurants named Surfside here in the District.

Case: 24-1243 Document: 132 Page: 1 Filed: 03/11/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEN DIGITAL INC., FKA SYMANTEC CORPORATION, FKA NORTONLIFELOCK, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2024-1243

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21-1622 Filed October 5, 2022 TITAN PRO SCI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ERIC MUFF, DAN FULTON and NEW AG BASICS, LLC, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Hancock County, DeDra Schroeder, Judge. The appellant-defendants challenge the district court’s de

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiffs Schwartzco Enterprises, LLC (“Schwartzco”), a New York limited liability company; the Meat House — Roslyn LLC (“TMH Roslyn”), a New York limited liability company; and Arnold M. Schwartz, an individual resident of New *338York (collectively the “Plaintiffs”

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On May 28, 2013, Plaintiffs commenced this action in New York State Supreme Court, in Schenectady County. See Dkt. No. 14-5. In the complaint, Plaintiffs asserts a claim of breach of contract based on Defendants’ failure to pay Plaintiffs a commission due on the Chobani Project. See id. In th