Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Newhouse v. Lord Corporation”
Newhouse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Boardpublic domain
109 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 96 (1987) 530 A.2d 545 Curtis Newhouse, Petitioner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Harris Cleaning Service, Inc.), Respondents. No. 351 C.D. 1986. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. September 2, 1987. Argued March 26, 1987. Before Judges BARRY and PALLADINO, and Senior Judge KALISH, sitting a
Bianca Ellis v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporationpublic domain
OPINION THACKER, Circuit Judge: Bianca Ellis, Mark Sroka, and Jaqueline Sroka (collectively, the “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing their putative class action complaint. They claim that Louisiana-Pacific Corp. (“LP” or the “Appellee”) negligently designed and manufactured Trimboard, a composite building product designed and marke
Gibson Ex Rel. Gibson v. Newhousepublic domain
402 S.W.2d 324 (1966) Paul GIBSON, Jr., By and Through His Next Friend, Alma Gibson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. Ben F. NEWHOUSE, Defendant-Respondent, and Bud Godsey, Defendant-Appellant. No. 51283. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. April 11, 1966. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer Denied May 9, 1966.
Messer v. Wei Chu (In re Xiang Yong Gao)public domain
DECISION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT NANCY HERSHEY LORD, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Plaintiff Gregory Messer (“Trustee”), Chapter 7 trustee of the estate of Xiang Yong Gao (“Gao” or “Debtor”), brought this adversary proceeding against Wei Chu (“Chu” or “Defendant”) to recover two transfers purportedly made by the Debtor to Chu, for no consideration, at a time when the Debtor was a defendant in a state court act
George v. National Water Main Cleaning Co.public domain
Gants, C.J. Several employees of National Water Main Cleaning Company filed a class action suit against the company and its parent company, Carylon Corporation, in the Superior Court, alleging, among other claims, nonpayment of wages in violation of the Massachusetts Wage Act, G. L. c. 149, §§ 148, 150 (Wage *372
Brown v. Secorpublic domain
Brown v. Secor, 2020 NCBC 82. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION CLEVELAND COUNTY 16 CVS 608 DOUGLAS BROWN, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ARTHUR D. SECOR; SECOR GROUP,
363 F.3d 299 Ferman SHALIEHSABOU, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 03-1314. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 21, 2004. Decided: April 2, 2004. ARGUED: Paul Frederick Newhouse, Towson, Maryland, for
Anderson v. Attorney Generalpublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12422 CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON & others1 vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL & others.2 Suffolk.
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. *835*522¶1 The circuit court ordered the arbitration of a private construction dispute stayed until it could decide an insurance coverage dispute between one of the contractors connected to the arbitration and the contractor's in
Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Joan B. Gottschall, United States District Judge Before the court are cross motions-for partial summary judgment and a motion:to dismiss two antitrust counterclaims pleaded in the defendants’ amended answer. The motions for summary judgment primarily involve a contract formation dispute with an antecedent choice-of-law question. Finding that the United Nations Convention on Co
Feeney v. Dell Inc.public domain
Marshall, C.J. We decide in this case whether a statutory right to participate in class action lawsuits can permissibly be foreclosed by a provision in a consumer contract compelling individual arbitration. The plaintiffs, John A. Feeney and Ded-ham Health and Athletic Complex (Dedham Health), appeal from an order of a judge in the Superior Court compelling arbitration of their claims — brought as a putative class action — alleg
Austin v. Regal Inv. Advisors, LLCpublic domain
Austin v. Regal Inv. Advisors, LLC, 2018 NCBC 3. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION ORANGE COUNTY 17 CVS 309 DIANE AUSTIN; WILLIAM AUSTIN; LISA GWYTHER; ROBERT GWYTHER; RONALD SHELTON; and VERONICA DALE SHELTON, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON
Abbington Spe, LLC v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'npublic domain
JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge On June 3, 2016, Abbington SPE, LLC ("Abbington" or "plaintiff") filed suit in *513Onslow County Superior Court against U.S. Bank, National Association ("U.S. Bank") and C-III Asset Management, LLC ("C-III") (collectively, "defendants") alleging various contract and tort claims under North
(2008) INDEPENDENT TRUST CORPORATION, an Illinois Corporation now in receivership, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a New York corporation, Defendant. No. 05 C 5749. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Ju
OPINION BY Judge COHN JUBELIRER. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. (Employer) petitions for review of an Order issued by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board). In its Order, the Board affirmed a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to grant the Claim Petition of Brenda Alston (Claimant) and ordered payment of disfigurement benefits. We affirm. The WCJ’s findings of fact prov
Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific LLCpublic domain
671 F.Supp.2d 785 (2009) Earl Clyde KELLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, and Georgia Pacific Wood Products LLC, Defendants. No. 7:08-CV-197-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. September 30, 2009. *787 Daniel K. Bryson, Scott C. Harri
Shaliehsabou v. Hebrew Homepublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT FERMAN SHALIEHSABOU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 03-1314 HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Green
United States v. Valdezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Nestor Valdez’ Sentencing Memorandum, filed September 24, 2013 (Doc. 72)(“Valdez Memo.”); and (ii) the United States’ Objection to the Pre-sentence Report and Response to Defendants [sic] Sentencing Memorandum, filed October 3, 2013 (Doc. 78)(“U.S. Memo.”). The Court held a se
Ajettix Inc. v. Raubpublic domain
*909OPINION OF THE COURT Kenneth R. Fisher, J. This is a dispute involving former 50% shareholders of a close corporation, Ajettix Incorporated. Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking legal and equitable relief for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud in connection with the agreement of Ajettix to redeem the stock owned by its vice-president and secre
235 F.Supp.2d 243 (2002) CSC HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER TERRACE AT CRISFIELD CONDOMINIUM; Westchester Terrace at Crisfield Condominium Association; Richard Neuman, as President of Westchester Terrace at Crisfield Condominium Association; and Digitech TV Corp., Inc., Defendants. No. 01CIV8134CMGAY. United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 21, 2002.