Cases

548 F.Supp. 1333 (1982) LIEM DUC NGUYEN, Minh Cong Ha, Kim Chi Thi Lam, Dzu Thuy Do, Tan Huy Nguyen, Vui Van Le, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE d/b/a the Southeast Asia Refugee Resettlement Office in Pittsburgh, and Frank Chinh Nguyen, individually and in his capacity as Supervisor and Director of the Southeast Asia Refugee Resettlement Office of Pittsburgh, and T

OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: Trump University, now defunct, was a for-profit entity that purported to teach Donald J. Trump’s “secrets of success” in the real estate industry. During the 2016 presidential election, Trump University and Trump were defendants in three lawsuits alleging fraud and violations of var

Dissent by Judge Nguyen OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves a nationwide class action settlement arising out of misstatements by defendants Hyundai Motor America, Inc. (Hyundai) and its affiliate, Kia Motors America, Inc. (Kia)1 regarding the fuel efficiency of their vehicles. The district court had

*1078 OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: In 2012, California enacted Senate Bill 863 (“SB 863”) to combat an acute “lien crisis” in its workers’ compensation system. These liens are filed by medical providers and other vendors to seek payment for services provided to an injured wor

MARC E, JOHNSON, Judge. | fiPlaintiffs/Appellants, Keela Hawkins, et al., appeal the sustaining of a declinato-ry exception of lack of jurisdiction, the granting of a motion .to strike and the denial of a motion for new trial-in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Willow Incorporated (hereinafter referred to .as “Willow, Inc.”) and National Home Insurance Company (A Risk Retention Group) (hereinafter referred to as “NHIC

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-2798 _____________ XIAOXING XI; JOYCE XI; QI LI, Appellants v. FBI SPECIAL AGENT ANDREW HAUGEN; JOHN DOES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEVIN MARILLEY; SALVATORE No. 13-17358 PAPETTI; SAVIOR PAPETTI, on behalf of themselves and D.C. No. similarly situated, 4:11-cv-02418-DMR Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION CHARLTON H. BONHAM, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Fish and Game, Defendant-Ap

*1152 HARTZ, Circuit Judge. For much of his life, Ernest John McKenzie’s Canadian birth certificate listed the wrong birth date. Because he used that birth certificate to become a naturalized United States citizen, his United States Certificate of Naturalization also listed the wrong birth date. After

State of Maryland v. Marconi Palmer, Jr., No. 50, September Term, 2025. Opinion by Eaves, J. ALCOHOL-RELATED DRIVING OFFENSES – SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – “NO REASONABLE TRIER OF FACT” STANDARD The Supreme Court of Maryland reaffirmed its holding in Smith v. State, 415 Md. 174 (2010), that the proper standard in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence in all criminal cases is the “no reasonable trier of fact” standard, announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Jackson v. Vir

658 F.3d 1060 (2011) Sylvester MAYA; Ofer Masachi, as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CENTEX CORPORATION; Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership; CTX Mortgage Company, Defendants-Appellees. Remedios Martinez, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.R. Horton, Inc.; DHI Mortgage Company GP, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Edilbe

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEVIN MARILLEY; SALVATORE No. 13-17358 PAPETTI; SAVIOR PAPETTI, on behalf of themselves and D.C. No. similarly situated, 4:11-cv-02418-DMR Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION CHARLTON H. BONHAM, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Fish and Game, Defendant-Ap

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-1900 et al In re: Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Product Liability Litigation ORDER AMENDING APPENDIX A TO OPINION Due to inadvertent clerical errors, Appendix A to the opinion was missing one appeal number (14-3220) and a lower court number (08-cv-00008). The Appendix has been revised and the corrected version will be filed as an attachment to this orde

ORDER RE: 1) MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; 2) MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT COLLECTIVE ACTION; AND 3) MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERT DECLARATION AND TESTIMONY JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiffs are minor league baseball players who assert *530

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY No. 18-15068 OF CALIFORNIA; JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official D.C. No. capacity as President of the 3:17-cv-05211-WHA University of California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RUN PETER CHHUON and SAMRETH SAM PAN, Defendants and Appellants. S105403 Los Angeles County Superior Court KA032767 June 1, 2026 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and J

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court are several motions related to the plaintiffs Amended Complaint, including separate motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by defendants Tommy Lynch (Docket No. 13), Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County (“Metro Nashville”) (Docket No. 16), the Board of Parks & Recreation (Docket No. 18), Kev

USCA11 Case: 18-13592 Document: 304-1 Date Filed: 12/30/2022 Page: 1 of 150 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13592 ____________________ DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and th

OPINION BOGGS, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Marc Bacon and Terry Harden, brought this employment discrimination action against defendant Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc., seeking to represent a class of all current and former African-American employees at Honda’s four manufacturing plants located in central Ohio. Plaintiffs appeal, asking for review of both

BRISCOE, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case arises from the Boeing Company’s (“Boeing”) 2005 sale, to Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. (“Spirit”), 1 of facilities in Wichita, Kansas, and Tulsa and McAIester, Oklahoma (the “Wichita Division” or “Division”). On June 16, 2005, Boeing terminated the Div

The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: John E. Robinson, Sr., was charged with multiple offenses related to the murders of six women—killings that constituted parts of a common scheme or course of conduct whereby Robinson would lure women to Johnson County with offers of employment, travel, and other benefits; exploit them sexually, financially, or otherwise; ldll them and dispose of their bodies