Cases

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the petition for review is DENIED. Petitioner Yi Mei Ni, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of the September 11, 2007 order of the BIA denying her motion to reopen. In re Yi Mei Ni, No. A77 340 941 (B.I.A. Sept. 11, 20

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Ji Hang Ni, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an August 22, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. In re Ji Hang Ni, No. A 79 089 873 (B.I.A. Aug. 22, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. When the BIA denies a motion to reopen or reconsid

SUMMARY ORDER Nian Kung Ni, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a September 28, 2007 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. In re Nian Kung Ni, No. A28 779 071 (B.I.A. Sept. 28, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. In reviewing the BIA’s denial of a motion to re

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Fa Peng Ni, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a May 3, 2007 order of the BIA, affirming the September 2, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“LJ”) Steven R. Abrams, denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In *126re Fa Peng Ni,

06-4477-ag, 06-5239-ag, 06-5302 Ni v. Board of Immigration Appeals, Zhou v. BCIS, Wang v. Mukasey UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2007 Docket No. 06-4477-ag Docket No. 06-5239-ag Docket No. 06-5302-ag (Argued

520 F.3d 125 (2008) SHENG GAO NI, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, Respondent. Peng-Di Zhou, Petitioner, v. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Respondent. Pin Zhou Wang, Petitioner, v. Michael B. Mukasey,[*] Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. Docket Nos. 06-4477-ag, 06-5239-ag, 06-5302-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners Igede Jaya Wirawan and Ni Made Yenawati, citizens of Indonesia, seek review of a February 22, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the July 25, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Michael W. Straus, denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Igede Jaya Wirawan, Ni Made Yenawati, Nos. A99 583 317/318 (B.I.A.

MEMORANDUM ** Anayeliy Galvan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Rosales-Rosales v. Ashcroft, 347 F.3d 714, 717 (9th Cir.2003)

MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Jorge Rochel-Romero, a citizen and native of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition. Denial of a motion to reopen deportation proceedings is reviewed for abuse of discretion. See Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 10

LEIGHTON, District Judge, dissenting. This court is bound to review adverse credibility determinations for substantial evidence, and we should reverse only if our review of the record compels us to a conclusion contrary to that reached below. I.N.S. v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir.2006).

SUMMARY ORDER Shao Ling Lian, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an October 16, 2007 order of the BIA denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. In re Shao Ling Lian, No. A76 525 946 (B.I.A. Oct. 16, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. When the BIA denies a motion to reopen,

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yan Yun Li, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a June 6, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the December 2, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Yan Yun Li, No. A 97 952 480 (B.I.A. June 6, 2007), aff'g No

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yan Yun Li, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a June 6, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the December 2, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Yan Yun Li, No. A 97 952 480 (B.I.A. June 6, 2007), aff'g No

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. Petitioner Shao Yong Zhou-Wu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a November 5, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the March 29, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sandy

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Huang Ni, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 28, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the May 23, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Annette S. Elstein, which denied his motion to reopen. In re Huang Ni, No. A070 886,159 (B.I.A. July 28, 2008), aff'g No. A070 886 159 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City May 23, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity

Filed: September 2, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1584 YI NI, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. O R D E R The Court amends its opinion filed July 13, 2010, as follows: On page 24, second paragraph, l

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Huang Ni, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 28, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the May 23, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Annette S. Elstein, which denied his motion to reopen. In re Huang Ni, No. A070 886,159 (B.I.A. July 28, 2008), aff'g No. A070 886 159 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City May 23, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the petition for review is DENIED. Petitioner Lin Ni, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the February 4, 2005 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Lin Ni, No. A70 530 730 (B.I.A. Feb.

635 F.3d 1014 (2011) ZHOU JI NI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 10-1691. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued December 8, 2010. Decided March 25, 2011. *1015 Thomas V. Massucci (argued), Attorney, New York, NY, for Petitioner. O

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the petition for review is DENIED. Petitioner Lin Ni, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the February 4, 2005 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Lin Ni, No. A70 530 730 (B.I.A. Feb.