Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Michael D. Stallman, J. In this personal injury action arising out of an alleged rear-end motor vehicle collision, defendants Edward M. Castillo, Advance Transit Co., Inc., and the New York City Transit Authority move for summary judgment dismissing the action and all cross claims asserted as against them. Defendants City of New York, New York City Department of Buildings and Perry R. Da

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: When a three-judge court is forced into the unwanted position of fashioning interim redistricting plans, the focus should be on practicality, balance, and moderation, albeit with unbending adherence to the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”) and the Constitution. The judges in the majority, with the purest of intentions, have instead produced a runaway plan that imposes an extrem

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 50 Docket: Oxf-22-138 Submitted On Briefs: October 19, 2022 Decided: August 15, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ.* NICHOLAS J. CAPELETY v. KYLA R. ESTES JABAR, J.

CLASS ACTION MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge Before the Court are motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judg *214 ment, filed

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

Filed 11/17/11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTIN M. PERRY et al., ) Plaintiffs and Respondents, ) ) v. ) S189476 ) EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., as Governor, etc., et al., ) 9th Cir. No. 10-16696 Defendants; )

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Before the Court is the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Railroad *671Friction Products Corporation (“Defendant” or “RFPC”). Plaintiff Alice Perry, as administratrix and in her own right, (“Plaintiff’ or “Mrs. Perry”), asserts that her hu

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2021 WY 82 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2021 July 8, 2021 NICHOLAS J. JENDRESEN, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-19-0154, S-20-0244 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal

OPINION GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice. On June 7, 2010, Appellee, Myriam Bar-ragan Bonacci, filed a petition for divorce seeking to dissolve her marriage to Appellant, Nicholas J. Bonacci. On June 8, 2011, the parties signed and entered into a binding mediated settlement agreement regarding the dissolution of their marriage under Texas Family Co

QUINCE, J. We have for review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in D.J. v. State, 43 So.3d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). In its opinion, the Third District affirmed a juvenile’s conviction for trespassing upon the grounds of a school facility in violation of section 810.097(2), Florida Statutes (2009). We granted review to resolve a conflict between the Third District’s decision and the decision of this C

ORDER PER CURIAM: Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

ORDER PER CURIAM: Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 01-NOV-2024 01:47 PM SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 18 ODMR IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII _______________________

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 15-OCT-2024 11:07 AM SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 11 OCOR IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 04-NOV-2024 09:38 AM SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 20 OCOR IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ______________________________

The plaintiff, Perry S. Gradford, appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial. Gradford contends that he is entitled to a new trial because, he says, the trial court incorrectly charged the jury as to *Page 146 his burden of proof. Our supreme court transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975. We affirm. Gradford was injured on the job when the boom

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-251 Filed 19 March 2025 Wake County, No. 23 CVS 1154 VANESSA AGUILAR AYALA, MARWA SAAD EL METWALLY, KAREEMELDIN ELAZAB, SHARY MARGARITA LEDESMA, PATIENCE IMONI LYNCH, YAQUELIN ESTELA MEDINA, RUBEN MEDINA, ERIKA MARIVEL MEJIA, DESTINY SAMUEL, KRISTIN M. ZEDEK and CARLOS ALVAREZ, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.

** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER ** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 15-OCT-2024 07:54 AM Dkt. 9 OP

Matter of Perry v Perry (2018 NY Slip Op 02513) Matter of Perry v Perry 2018 NY Slip Op 02513 Decided on April 12, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

[Cite as State v. Perry, 2023-Ohio-3106.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2023-01-004 : OPINION - vs -